. (⚠️نکته: عبارت In your family یک عبارت دلخواه است که آخر جمله اومده و شما میتونید کلا حذفش کنید و آسیبی به گرامر سوال وارد نخواهد کرد) . 🔹 آیدی پشتیبانی👇 @PuzzleHubBot .

Channel
انگلیسی در 24 ساعت با دکتر منوچهرزاده
@drmanoochehrzadeh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
81,434subscribers
-2,872 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001016895278 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drmanoochehrzadeh |
| Description | 🔅تنها کلاس زبان تضمینی در ایران هستیم😍 🔹️من مهدی منوچهرزاده هستم و زبان انگليسی رو ضمن فقط 24 ساعت بهتون آموزش میدم🥰 اگه میخوای نمونه ویدیو دوره های پازلینگ رو ببینی، همین حالا نام و شماره تماست رو به آیدی زیر ارسال کن☺️✨ @Drmanoochehrzadehbot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drmanoochehrzadeh |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 81,434 | -149 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 81,583 | -111 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 81,694 | -67 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 81,761 | -102 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 81,863 | -142 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 82,005 | -206 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 82,211 | -127 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 82,338 | -79 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 82,417 | -40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 82,457 | -57 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 82,514 | -56 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 82,570 | -61 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 82,631 | -45 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 82,676 | -72 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 82,748 | -66 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 82,814 | -89 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 82,903 | -70 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 82,973 | -107 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 83,080 | -158 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 83,238 | first reading |
Engagement
848 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.925%
- avg views ÷ 81,434 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 754
- 476 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.509%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 476
- of 848 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 325 of 476 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 848 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 358,734 |
| Reactions total | 1,293 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,010
- Videos
- ≈2,960
- Links
- ≈935
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 23m 19s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 188 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,424 reactions across 558 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,571 | 64.8% | |
| 👍 | 764 | 31.5% | |
| 🤩 | 30 | 1.24% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 0.701% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 0.413% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 0.371% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 0.248% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 0.248% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 0.248% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.124% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.083% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 584 of the 848 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,424 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 848 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
. 🧩 چیدمان نهایی پازل: 🔸Who is . (چه کسی هست…) 👤 🔸An excellent swimmer (یک شناگر عالی…) 🏊♀️ . 🔸In your family (در خانواده شما…) 🏠❤️ . دمت گرم، این پازل هم با موفقیت حل شد💥 . 🔹 آیدی پشتیبانی👇 @PuzzleHubBot .
. حالا باید اسم موردنظر را بگوییم؛ یعنی Swimmer 🏊♂️ اگر صفت هم داشته باشد، صفت را قبل از اسم میآوریم ✅ . 🗣️ مثل این: Who is an excellent swimmer …? = چه کسی یک شناگر عالی است …؟ 🌟 . 📌 ترتیب درست: صفت + اسم Excellent swimmer 💙 . 🔹 آیدی پشتیبانی👇 @PuzzleHubBot .
. بعد از کلمه پرسشی، جمله باید حالت سوالی داشته باشد؛ پس از فعل To be استفاده میکنیم: Is ✅ . 🗣️ یعنی: Who is ...? = چه کسی هست ...؟ 👤❓ . 📌 چون معنی جمله «چه کسی هست؟» را میرساند، از To be استفاده میکنیم. 🌟 . 🔹 آیدی پشتیبانی👇 @PuzzleHubBot .
❤4
. 🏊♂️ سوال: چه کسی در خانواده شما، شناگر ماهری است؟ ✅ جواب: Who is a skilled swimmer in your family? . 📌 چرا Who؟ چون سوال با «چه کسی» شروع شده، پس باید از Who استفاده کنیم.❓ . 📌 نکته: اینجا Who خودش فاعل جمله است، برای همین Do / Does نمیآوریم. 👌 . 🔹 آیدی پشتیبانی👇 @PuzzleHubBot .
❤4
. 🔹سلام به زبانآموزان عزیز 🌸 امیدواریم حالتون عالی باشه 🧡 🔔 امروز هم قراره یک سوال مهم دیگه رو بررسی کنیم. . 🔸در مکالمات، ممکنه با سوالهایی مثل: 🎸 «چه کسی در خانوادهاتون گیتار بلد است؟» مواجه شده باشید. . 🔹حالا میخوایم یاد بگیریم چطور با افعال To be و کلمات پرسشی بپرسیم: . 🏊♂️ «چه کسی شناگر است؟» یا «چه کسی شناگر ماهر است؟» 🔸بیایید قدم به قدم پیش بریم 👇 . 🔹 آیدی پشتیبانی👇 @PuzzleHubBot .
. 💌رضایت خانم پانیذ رضایی از پازلینگ پلاس 💌 . 🧕خانم پانیذ رضایی با رضایت کامل از دورههای پازلینگ پلاس میگن که این مسیر، براشون فقط یک کلاس زبان نبوده؛ 🧩بلکه یه شروع دوباره برای یادگیری انگلیسی بوده 💙 👨🏻🏫چیزی که بیش از همه براشون جذاب و اثرگذار بوده، اینه که در پایان هر جلسه، اشکالاتشون دقیق برطرف میشه و مشاورها و پشتیبانها هم همیشه کنارشون هستن 🤝 💽همین باعث شده آموختههای هر جلسه، همونجا توی ذهنشون …
🧩اگر دوست داری بدونی چطور میتونی بورسیه بشی و چه شرایطی داره نام و شماره تماست رو به آیدی پشتیبانی ارسال کن آیدی پشتیبانی 👇 @PuzzleHubBot .
👌3❤1👍1😍1
👇👇👇
❤2
Which one is correct?
- She is angry at her husband, because he can't cook.27%
- She is angry with her husband, because he is not an excellent cook.42%
- She is angry with his husband, because he can't cook.31%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2
Which one is correct?
- Is she angry at her sister?23%
- Is she angry with her sister?69%
- Is she angry with his sister?8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👇👇👇
Showing the 12 most recent of 848 posts we hold for @drmanoochehrzadeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@drmanoochehrzadeh edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 180 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which one is correct?
- She is angry at her husband, because he can't cook.27%
- She is angry with her husband, because he is not an excellent cook.42%
- She is angry with his husband, because he can't cook.31%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one is correct?
- Is she angry at her sister?23%
- Is she angry with her sister?69%
- Is she angry with his sister?8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one is correct?
- He is angry with his laptop23%
- He isn't angry at his laptop13%
- He is angry at his laptop65%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one is correct?
- I'm angry at my brother10%
- I'm angry at my cousin15%
- I'm angry at this car74%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one is correct?
- A:My sister is worried about her husband.21%
- B:My sister is worried about his husband.16%
- C:My sister is angry with her husband.10%
- A & C53%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is your father worried about your sister?
- Yes, he's.54%
- Yes, she is.12%
- No, he is not33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 848 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@farshbuf · 214,933#1
@mohammd_karimi_com · 186,809#2
@englishmedia_ir · 315,832#3
@englishier · 320,275#4
@mohsenmodhejaip · 46,868#5
@shabanimahdii · 21,049#6
@zaban_jazireh · 4,302#7
@hamidrezasotoudeh98 · 72,689#8
@Amozeshgah_Gooyesh · 8,697#9
@Nemone_Tadriss · 3,924#10
@Akhavass · 31,230#11
@lect_negotio · 23,226#12
@didebanEnglish · 3,028#13
@PetrosProxy · 302,083#14
@Drmanoochehrzadehcomments · 1,281#15
@Moeindesignchannel · 1,344#16
@danix404 · 1,749#17
@Shabookii · 280#18
@classcity · 1,142#19
@seo_zone · 188#20
@ArioM1 · 1,039#21
@drkavyanii22 · 201,436#22
@zist_tarkibi · 561 (as read 18 August 2026)#23
@baham_yad_begirim · 1,105#24
@Puzzle_Your_Dream · 1,004#25
@gozzatti · 97,210#26
@ICHuora · 2,473#27
@biologygy · 100 (as read 18 August 2026)#28
@mehransharifianofficial · 4,899#29
@boletzhornal · 2,709#30
@eshghastriazi1 · 8,007#31
@classino_com · 224,595#32
@nerotea · 97#33
@arabiquran1 · 8,768#34
@all_englishstories · 22,783#35
@arshadaplusacademy · 679#36
@Duolingo_Englishtest · 15,770#37
@biologyzistase · 279 (as read 18 August 2026)#38
@tarahihelen · 9,452#39
@soulixstudio · 987#40
@kaafe_talkh · 25,505#41
@Myporoxy · 4,491,818#42
@rayganzabann · 3,160#43
@angellnumbers · 1,138#44
@viilabama · 37,198#45
@Sharif_Geotechnical · 4,707#46
@LoveUnlockedir · 1,437#47
@kahkeshanehnisti · 2,255#48
@mathkurd · 3,644#49
@dogs · 7,065,215#50
@turkibox4 · 726 (as read 18 August 2026)#51
@kurdpayam_bana · 676#52
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#53
@ROMANCE_Classical · 590 (as read 18 August 2026)#54
@parsa6400 · 541#55
@tunnellingbooks · 680 (as read 18 August 2026)#56
@podcast_rokh · 13,122#57
@notcoin · 8,643,687#58
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#59
@fehrestaudio · 4,347#60
@iust_physics · 583#61
@erfanvametafizik · 34,344#62
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@englishmedia_ir · 315,832
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انگلیسی در 24 ساعت با دکتر منوچهرزاده” (@drmanoochehrzadeh), 81,434 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drmanoochehrzadeh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.