Channel
@fxamarket
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,187subscribers
+17,184 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001784152701 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fxamarket |
| Description | 🪙راهی که ۶ ساله ازش درآمد کسب میکنم را میخوام بهتون بگم، این راه واسه من چند صد میلیون تومن درآمد داشته. یک هفته همراهم باش به درآمد دلاری میرسی🌱💸 برای ارتباط نزدیکتر،آیدی پشتیبانی👇🏻 @Forexwithsina |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fxamarket |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @fxamarket/24045 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC | @strategyclose/196448 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC | 1.00 | 26 days |
| @strategyclose/196508 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC | @fxamarket/24481 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC | 1.00 | 15 days |
| @strategyclose/196569 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC | @fxamarket/24101 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC | 1.00 | 6 days |
| @fxamarket/24055 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC | @strategyclose/1972612 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC | 1.00 | 30 days |
| @fxamarket/24567 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC | @strategyclose/200465 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC | 1.00 | 13 days |
| @fxamarket/24851 · this entry30 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC | @strategyclose/2053113 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTC | 1.00 | 14 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @strategyclose | 197 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 6 days | this entry (118–79) |
| @sinatrade1 | 56 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 6 days | @sinatrade1 (46–10) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 125 of the 125 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 951 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @fxamarket — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 20:39 | 52,187 | +170 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 23:57 | 52,017 | +363 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 12:50 | 51,654 | +158 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 51,496 | -19 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 51,515 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 51,516 | +14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 51,502 | -26 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:57 | 51,528 | +345 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 51,183 | +354 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:29 | 50,829 | +257 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:04 | 50,572 | +292 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:49 | 50,280 | +465 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:30 | 49,815 | +591 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 49,224 | +579 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 48,645 | +921 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:56 | 47,724 | +1,400 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:35 | 46,324 | +779 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 45,545 | +1,302 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 44,243 | +418 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:06 | 43,825 | first reading |
1,013 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 233 of 324 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,013 (12 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 363,679 |
| Reactions total | 2,306 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,222 reactions across 751 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,176 | 85.5% | |
| 👍 | 428 | 5.93% | |
| ❤🔥 | 197 | 2.73% | |
| 🙏 | 178 | 2.46% | |
| 👏 | 160 | 2.22% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 0.623% | |
| 😎 | 14 | 0.194% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 0.138% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 0.069% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.055% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.028% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.028% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.014% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 771 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 324 posts held from the last 30 days (5.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
کمتر از یک ساعت دیگه جلسه ی آموزش درآمد دلاری شروع میشه‼️👆 مهم ترین نکته ای که باید بدونید اینه که برخلاف جاهای دیگه، اینجا شما قراره مسیردرآمد دلاری بدون آزمون و خطا رو یاد بگیرید✅ مسیری که سالهاست داره توسط خود من و هزاران دانشجوم تست میشه و کلی سود به همراه داشته💸💸👆
تو این جلسه وبینار آموزش درآمد دلاری از ترید چه اتفاقی میوفته⁉️ یه بخشی از مطالب وبینارو داخل ویس گفتم با دقت گوش بدید ⚠️👆 ویس دو 📍
۱۲۰ دلار معادل ۱۶ میلیون تومن تو یک روز از ترید بدست آورده این دانشجوم👆💸 هفته ای ۵۰ میلیون سود هم در نظر بگیرید، ماهی ۲۰۰ میلیون درآمدتون میشه از این مسیر🔥👆 تو وبینار امروز ساعت ۱۲:۰۰ قراره راه و روش بدست آوردن این سود هارو بهتون آموزش بدم غافل نشید جلسات به هیچ عنوان تکرار نمیشن❌
تو جلسه ی آموزش امروز قراره چی یاد بگیریم⁉️ قراره بهتون مسیری رو نشون بدم که طی یک هفته از صفر بتونید درآمد دلاری داشته باشید💲✅ و علاوه بر اون راهی رو یاد میگیرید که این درآمد دلاری براتون به صورت مستمر تکرار بشه هر ماه🔥💸 راهی که ریسک و ضرر نداره❌ دقت کنید جلسات اصلا ذخیره نمیشن❌اگر راس ساعت شرکت نکنید آموزش رو از دست میدید📌
داخل این جلسه وبینار چه اتفاقی میوفته ⁉️⁉️ یک هفته زمان گذاشتم تا وبیناری طراحی کنم که یه فرد ۱۶ تا ۶۰ ساله رو بتونه توی یک هفته به درآمد دلاری برسونه ✅ یه بخشی از مطالب وبینار را داخل ویس گفتم با دقت گوش بدید ⚠️👆 ویس یک 📍
روزتون بخیر 🌞☀️ امروز راس ساعت ۱۲:۰۰ جلسه ی وبینار” آموزش درآمددلاری از ترید” هستش 🔥🔥 بریم بهتون بگم قراره چه چیزهایی از جلسه ی امروز یاد بگیرید💎
2️⃣🔴 نه تنها من بلکه صدها نفر از من ترید و استراتژی رو یاد گرفتن و دارن روزانه چند صد دلار سود به دست میارند👆کلی عکس از سود دانشجو در تاریخ های مختلف ، قدیم و جدید دارم که اثبات میکنه این استراتژی من جواب میده همیشه✅ ۳ تا فرصت ویژه برای مشاوره قرار دادم همین الان کلمه "مشاوره" ارسال کن تا برای شروع راهنماییت کنیم 👇 @Forexwithsina
1️⃣🔴 من به شما استراتژی شخصی خودم که سالها روش کار کردم و خودم تا همین الان هم دارم باهاش معامله میکنم و این سود هارو بدست میارم رو از صفر تا ۱۰۰ آموزش میدم ✅ پس خودم سالهاست دارم از این استراتژی سود بدست میارم تو عکس ببینین👆
❤3
چه تضمینی وجود داره که بتونم به درآمد دلاری برسم⁉️ چنتا دلیل برای تضمین درآمدزاییتون دارم که تو پست های پایین بهتون میگم👇🏼
شاید تو بگی تحلیل بلد نیستم ❌ من میگم از سیگنال استفاده کن ✅ تو میگی وقت نداری نمیرسی نمیتونی میترسی اشتباه کنی ‼️ من کمکت میکنم وصلت میکنم به حساب شرکتم میتونی از معاملات من استفاده کنی ✅ تو میگی سرمایه برای شروع ندارم ❌ من برات کمک سرمایه فعال میکنم آموزشت میدم و بعد خودم توی شرکتم استخدامت میکنم ✅😅 دیگه دلیلت برای شروع نکردن چیه ⁉️
این جلسه وبینار از تموم شد رفقا 🙌 فردا راس ساعت ۱۲ توی جلسه بعد میبینمتون✅ امروز افتخار همراهی بیشتر از ۲۰۰۰ نفرتون رو داشتم خسته نباشید همگی دمتون گرم، منم همه جوره کنارتونم 🌱 روی کمک من حساب باز کنید ❤️ نظرتون رو در رابطه با جلسه حتما بهم بگید و هر سوال و مطلبی هست حتما بپرسید تا توسط پشتیبان های مجموعه راهنمایی بشید 👇 @forexwithsina
❤6
زرنگ اونیه که راس ساعت تو جلسه امروز شرکت میکنه چون پایان جلسه یک شرایط خیلی خوب برای استخدام یه تعدادی از شما هم در نظر گرفتم با شرایط عالی💎🤫 بیشتر نمیگم چون مخصوص اوناییه که تا انتهای جلسه حضور دارن✅ راس ساعت ۱۲:۰۰ تو جلسه میبینمتون♥️
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,013 posts we hold for @fxamarket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 7 posts on @fxamarket as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
رفقا بنظر شما جنگ میشه یا خیر ⁉️
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
رفقا بنظر شما جنگ میشه یا خیر ⁉️
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
همه نظرسنجی شرکت کنید رفقا ⁉️
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 11 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش درآمددلاری از ایران📍 💸” (@fxamarket), 52,187 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fxamarket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.