Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BTC Price

Channel

BTC Price

@BTCprices

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,832subscribers

-330 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001313788595
TypeChannel
Username@BTCprices
DescriptionMust-have channel for everybody in our big cryptocurrency family! Actual Bitcoin price is always on top of your chat list. Easily forward price to your friends and clients! For Ethereum prices, use @ethprices For USDT prices, use @usdtrubprices
Created1 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BTCprices

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,83226,16325,997.56 August 2026 — 26,162 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,162 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,163 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,152 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,142 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,137 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,119 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,104 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,090 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,087 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,066 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,053 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,035 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,023 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,996 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,016 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,046 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,052 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,072 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,073 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,074 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,084 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,078 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,065 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,053 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,032 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,020 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,003 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,989 subscribers7 September 2026 — 25,953 subscribers10 September 2026 — 25,908 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,883 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,866 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,852 subscribers18 September 2026 — 25,832 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -330. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,782–26,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:1825,832-20
15 Sept 2026, 22:4125,852-14
14 Sept 2026, 09:4025,866-17
12 Sept 2026, 20:1625,883-25
10 Sept 2026, 20:1825,908-45
7 Sept 2026, 20:2225,953-36
4 Sept 2026, 22:3625,989-14
3 Sept 2026, 07:0326,003-17
2 Sept 2026, 04:1226,020-12
1 Sept 2026, 07:0726,032-21
31 Aug 2026, 04:1426,053-12
30 Aug 2026, 04:4826,065-13
29 Aug 2026, 05:3426,078-6
28 Aug 2026, 09:0626,084+10
27 Aug 2026, 05:3226,074+1
26 Aug 2026, 08:3226,073+1
25 Aug 2026, 09:1726,072+20
24 Aug 2026, 11:2926,052+6
22 Aug 2026, 18:3826,046+30
20 Aug 2026, 09:0226,016first reading

Engagement

1,220 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.035%
avg views ÷ 25,832 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.2
300 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
300
of 1,220 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 300 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held1,220 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total2,750
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,280
Links
≈25,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤555.6%
🤡222.2%
👎111.1%
💩111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,220 posts we hold for @BTCprices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

GRAM Price
@tonusdprices · 24,335
19 posts
ETH Price
@ethprices · 13,838
16 posts
SOL Price
@solusdprices · 13,099
12 posts
BNB Price
@bnbusdprices · 6,378
4 posts
Tekken Gems Calls
@tekkengemscalls · 243
4 posts
KOREA alpha DEGEN
@KOREAalphaDEGEN · 8,237
3 posts
Marco Calls
@MarcocallsVII · 34
3 posts
MadGecko | DEX CEX ETH BTC and More
@madgeckocrypto · 3
3 posts
Школотос на крипте
@schcolotanacrypte · 2
2 posts
AKKYRGYZ
@AKKYRGYZ · 10
1 post
Альфредо TON
@Alfredoton · 745
1 post
Daydreamer's Crypto Hub
@DaydreamersCryptoHub · 2,283
1 post
Dobby's Gem Calls
@DobbysGems · 757
1 post
ELLGems
@ELLGems · 142
1 post
Gift Intelligence
@GiftIntell · 224
1 post
K.A.M
@KAMJournal · 247
1 post
LUNAR GEMS CALL 📢
@LUNARgemsCALL · 13,354
1 post
Legacy Calls
@Legacy_calls009 · 70
1 post
Plz fade mustacho’s cooks 😈
@LittleMustachoCalls · 9,808
1 post
MIDAS GEMS
@Midas_Gems · 2
1 post
𝕆𝕟 𝙲𝕙𝕒𝕚𝕟 𝙷𝕚𝕕𝕕𝕖𝕟 𝔾𝕖𝕞𝕤💎✨
@OnChainGains · 76
1 post
Samira Trading
@SamiraTrading · 1,330
1 post
SixGems
@SixGems666 · 9
1 post
TRAILBLAZER 📊 CALLS
@TOKENTrailblazers1 · 30
1 post
광고 다 없애고 중요한 뉴스만 들고오는 채널이양
@agicansam · 11
1 post
Akocoin
@akocoincom · 85
1 post
AXI | crypto
@axi_moneys · 2,011
1 post
Boss.ETH MAIN CHANNEL
@bossethcommunity · 1,753
1 post
Contraceptive Apes
@contraceptiveapes · 1,074
1 post
آموزش توکن Hamster همستر
@crypto_gambles · 1
1 post
Essential's Gambles
@essentialgamble · 68
1 post
1 fundamental
@fundametal1 · 801
1 post
Kabak
@kabak666 · 99
1 post
Marlboro Gifts
@marlborogifts · 782
1 post
Robinhood
@moneykay30 · 3
1 post
내 부인 아르카나
@mywifeArcana · 1,594
1 post
Paltys gift
@ooopaltyshaslooo · 8
1 post
Pablo’s Calls
@pablocalls · 179
1 post
Database
@psnlogprfect · 288
1 post
0219
@r0219 · 393
1 post
Rarbin’s Alpha 💸
@rarbinsalpha · 233
1 post
Redd's Store
@reddstore · 94
1 post
SCAM FORBES - музей ♻️
@scamforbes · 122
1 post
Winter Arc with Rarbin
@winterarcwrarbin · 17
1 post
Gensler Gems
@wizardshitposting · 8
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TON Price
@tonprices · 56,240
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 23 August 2026
نرخ لحظه ای دلار تهران
@NerkhDollarIRT · 87,763
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
GOLD ONLINE
@goldonline2016 · 65,741
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 August 2026
نقدی(پله)
@NaghdP · 68,914
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
آن تايم انس
@ontimeounce · 53,226
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
آبشده نقدی پایتخت
@abshdanaghdy · 171,305
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
توئیتر داغ خبری (اخبار جنگ ایران و‌آمریکا )
@twiier_news · 51,303
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
️️کینگ پاور ترید️️
@king_powr · 48,848
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
🔺پله آهنی آنلاین 🔻
@tehranpelle · 56,337
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
JUST IN TIME
@abshdh · 196,465
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
تترلند | Tether Land
@TetherLand · 72,143
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
ON TIME
@mazene · 56,684
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
کانال رسمی MISHOV MARKETS
@MISHOV_FOREX · 50,801
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
دکتر فرهاد شایگان👑
@farhad1356 · 79,336
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
اخبار جنگ و اعتراضات
@ucn_ir · 159,759
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BTC Price” (@BTCprices), 25,832 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTCprices.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.