в день своей свадьбы я с тихим трепетом вспоминаю прошлое лето, когда впервые сформулировала для себя четко и ясно, что готова к любви. тогда я никуда не спешила, не хваталась за первое попавшееся и никому не доказывала, что меня стоит выбрать, а просто дала себе время выбирать медленно и с удовольствием, как выбирают за долгим столом самое вкусное. и любовь пришла. она вообще приходит ко всем, только не все могут е…

Channel
Мари в большом городе
@naiznankumari
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,908subscribers
+1,879 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001440403601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @naiznankumari |
| Created | 11 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/naiznankumari |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:55 | 20,908 | +87 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 20,821 | +77 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 20,744 | +81 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 20,663 | +67 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 20,596 | +136 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 20,460 | +100 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 20,360 | +41 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:27 | 20,319 | -72 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:54 | 20,391 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 20,379 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 20,370 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 20,372 | +12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 20,360 | +25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 20,335 | +70 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 20,265 | +140 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 20,125 | +39 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 20,086 | +13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 20,073 | +53 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:59 | 20,020 | -23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 20,043 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.1%
- avg views ÷ 20,908 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,960
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (2 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 8,870 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
about last (crazy) days
если вы хотите узнать, как именно вы строите отношения с людьми, посмотрите, как вы строите их со своим психологом. если вы всё время думаете, что он о вас подумал, и стараетесь понравиться, значит, вы так и живёте, в поиске одобрения. если просите особых условий, переносов, исключений из правил, значит, вы не выдерживаете границы другого из своей грандиозности и имеете трудности с установлением своих собственных. е…
никак, потому что он изменится. и вы изменитесь тоже. невозможно забетонировать ни себя, ни его, ни то, что происходит между вами. отношения живые, они дышат, растут, болеют, выздоравливают, и спустя десять лет они точно не будут выглядеть так же, как выглядят сейчас, в самом их начале. гарантий нет. и чем раньше вы это примете, тем легче вам будет встречаться с разочарованием, которое тоже неизбежно, потому что он…
Voice message, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
в свадебных хлопотах совсем не было времени общаться с Вами здесь, как в старые добрые 🍸♥️ исправляюсь, сегодня буду отвечать на вопросы из анонимного опросника!
дописываю сейчас презентацию по вебинару про отношения через призму нарциссической травмы (в нашей группе сегодня встреча) и случайным образом натыкаюсь на заметку с советами Муми-троллей, о которых, как мне кажется, всем важно помнить: 1. одинаково важно знать две вещи: как быть одному и как быть с другими. 2. иногда кто-то нуждается в тишине и уединении, и в этом нет ничего плохого. нельзя же быть постоянно привет…
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @naiznankumari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fatima_abdulkarim · 26,678
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 12 September 2026
@yasamineTM · 56,946
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 September 2026
@makktinaaa · 45,813
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 August 2026
@gutvaleriy · 29,181
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
@zinashamoyan · 71,035
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@killme9O2 · 38,224
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
@dmitrykompaniets · 40,871
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@ainspiracja · 37,546
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
@maxtreysi · 44,518
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мари в большом городе” (@naiznankumari), 20,908 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naiznankumari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.