Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 234 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net +409. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,169–32,982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 13:19
32,888
+28
10 Nov 2026, 12:08
32,860
+7
9 Nov 2026, 02:49
32,853
+26
7 Nov 2026, 19:41
32,827
+47
6 Nov 2026, 16:19
32,780
+62
5 Nov 2026, 19:51
32,718
+11
4 Nov 2026, 22:49
32,707
+6
3 Nov 2026, 20:17
32,701
-7
2 Nov 2026, 16:58
32,708
-5
1 Nov 2026, 18:19
32,713
-13
31 Oct 2026, 21:09
32,726
-7
30 Oct 2026, 20:01
32,733
+1
29 Oct 2026, 17:16
32,732
+1
28 Oct 2026, 20:09
32,731
+12
27 Oct 2026, 19:41
32,719
-9
26 Oct 2026, 18:21
32,728
-4
25 Oct 2026, 16:26
32,732
-9
24 Oct 2026, 18:00
32,741
+61
23 Oct 2026, 16:06
32,680
+3
22 Oct 2026, 19:16
32,677
first reading
Engagement
671 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.12%
avg views ÷ 32,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,000
217 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
217
of 671 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 204 of 217 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
671 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
650,723
Reactions total
6,767
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 23m
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 126 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,572 reactions across 635 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,485
40.3%
custom 5424776099823363879
3,552
19.1%
🔥
2,528
13.6%
❤🔥
1,665
8.97%
👍
1,052
5.66%
💔
283
1.52%
🏆
261
1.41%
💘
200
1.08%
🤩
157
0.845%
🎉
150
0.808%
😢
132
0.711%
😍
106
0.571%
👏
101
0.544%
💯
90
0.485%
🙏
88
0.474%
👎
73
0.393%
😭
73
0.393%
custom 5258439665786056948
63
0.339%
🤬
61
0.328%
custom 5260242821905933985
52
0.28%
31 further kinds
400
2.15%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 647 of the 671 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,604 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 671 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
279
across the posts below
Posts paid on
48
of 671 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
76
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russian_sambo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 671 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 217 posts held from the last 30 days (7.83%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Что такое спорт для ребенка?
В новой коллекции GULLIVER × САМБО, созданной в партнерстве с Всероссийской федерацией самбо, национальный вид спорта встречается с эстетикой уличной моды.
Белый, синий и красный — основа палитры. Узнаваемая символика самбо, фактурные принты, объемная вышивка и текстильные шевроны задают характер коллекции.
Худи, свитшоты, футболки, джоггеры и аксессуары легко комбинируются между собой…
⚡️ Москва готовится отметить Всероссийский день самбо
15 и 16 ноября Международный центр самбо в Москве станет площадкой праздничных мероприятий, посвящённых Всероссийскому дню самбо. Программа объединит командные встречи, личные соревнования и торжественное празднование дня рождения отечественного единоборства.
15 ноября состоятся командные встречи. На ковёр выйдут представители команд, которые поборются за победу…
⚡️ Чемпионы мира вернулись домой!⚡️
🥇 Смотрите, как екатеринбургском аэропорту Кольцово встречали самбистов, вернувшихся с чемпионата мира!
Поздравляем наших спортсменов с заслуженными наградами!
🔴 ПРАВИЛА САМБО 🔴
🫳 Удержанием считается фиксация соперника на лопатках к ковру с контролем туловища. Максимальная оценка за удержание в спортивном самбо - 4 балла.
Подари свой голос САМБО ⭐️ ВФС
MAX | ВК
Дорогие друзья, уважаемые спортсмены, тренеры и ветераны самбо!
От имени Комитета национальных и неолимпийских видов спорта России и от себя лично сердечно поздравляю вас с яркой победой в общекомандном зачете на Чемпионате мира в Ташкенте. Самбо — это не просто вид спорта, это наш национальный бренд, интеллектуальная система самообороны, которая впитала в себя мудрость и силу народных единоборств.
Каждая медаль, з…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣ Пришло время подвести итоги спортивных выходных в рубрике «Уик-энд в цифрах». О многих ярких победах российских спортсменов мы уже рассказывали отдельно, но есть и другие события, заслуживающие внимания.
2️⃣5️⃣ медалей завоевала сборная России на чемпионате мира по самбо, что принесло ей 1️⃣-е место в командном зачёте! На счету наших спортсменов 1️⃣8️⃣ золотых, 3️⃣ серебряных и 4️⃣ бронзовых награды. Вперв…
🎥 Сборную России по самбо, выигравшую медальный зачет чемпионата мира в Ташкенте, встретили в Шереметьево.
Как рассказал РЕН ТВ самбист Александр Сучков, друзья, коллектив и особенно родители верили в него. Во время борьбы он получал удовольствие и в итоге выиграл.
"Сам себе сказал — надо все или ничего, отдать всего себя на ковре и выиграть этот мир, а потом уже думать о дальнейших планах", — поделился он.
🗣 Спор…
ВСТРЕЧА НАШИХ ЧЕМПИОНОВ!
🔥Сегодня вечером в аэропорту Пулково встретили Питерских самбистов! Домой вернулись три наших чемпиона мира - Демид Волков, Михаил Мохнаткин и Асланбек Кодзаев!
💥Скорее смотрим кадры этой теплой встречи!
🇷🇺Мы в МАХ/ 😄Мы в VK
🥇@spb_sambo
сборная России по самбо успешно приземлилась на родине!!!
спасибо вам всем за поддержку наших ребят❤️❤️❤️
Подари свой голос САМБО ⭐️ ВФС
MAX | ВК
❤77❤🔥23👍20🔥12custom 542477609982336387910💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 671 posts we hold for @russian_sambo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@russian_sambo edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
19 October 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 28 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⭐️ Первый день Кубка Мира нам принёс 26 медалей (13 золотых, 5 серебряных и 8 бронзовых)
Ваши ставки, сколько возьмём завтра? Пишите ваши предположения в комментариях👇
1466%
1023%
52%
88%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⭐️ Сколько спортсменов может представить одна страна в одной весовой категории на Кубке мира?
Одного30%
Двух47%
Трех8%
Четырёх15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 671 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Федерация САМБО Свердловской области @sambo_so · 3,779#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Федерация Дзюдо России @rus_judo · 41,271 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 30 August 2026
PRO | Дзюдо @judo_pro · 23,579 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 18 September 2026
Дзюдо Арт @judoart · 27,797 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 11 September 2026
International Judo Federation @ijudo · 22,947 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Всероссийская федерация самбо(ru.wikipedia.org) “…[https://vk.com/sambo_federation Официальное сообщество ВКонтакте]
* [https://t.me/russian_sambo Официальный канал в Телеграме]
{{rq|
{{значимость|дата=2013-01-23}}…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Всероссийская Федерация Самбо” (@russian_sambo), 32,888 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russian_sambo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.