9 Oct 2023, 09:56 UTC≈12,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
Econ. Growth Channel
@growthecon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,848subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001125764495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @growthecon |
| Created | 24 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/growthecon |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 3,848 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 3,849 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 3,850 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 3,850 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 April 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
9 Oct 2023, 09:50 UTC≈13,400 viewsread 8 August 2026
⚡️Премию по экономике памяти Нобеля 2023 года получает Клаудия Голдин «за лучшее понимание положения женщин на рынке труда»
10 Oct 2022, 19:46 UTC≈17,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Econsonline
Нобелевские лауреаты по экономике 2022 г. создали научные основы для понимания функционирования банковской системы и ее ключевой роли в экономике, и для формирования современного банковского регулирования. Их открытия помогли справиться с крупнейшими глобальными кризисами 2008 и 2020 гг. Премию разделили трое американских экономистов. Бен Бернанке – более известный как бывший глава ФРС, но в действительности еще и в…
10 Oct 2022, 15:11 UTC≈27,800 viewsread 8 August 2026
И сегодня самое время переслушать эту нестареющую классику: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipJTqCbETog
10 Oct 2022, 14:48 UTC≈9,980 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
10 Oct 2022, 14:48 UTC≈15,500 viewsread 8 August 2026
Нобелевскую премию 2022 года по экономике получают Бен Бернанке, Дуглас Даймонд и Филип Дыбвиг "за исследования банков и финансовых кризисов". Думал посмотреть церемонию объявления онлайн, а в итоге проспал, и в шесть утра меня встретило на телефоне уведомление от NYT: "Нобелевскую премию по экономике получил бывший глава ФРС Бернанке и ещё двое ученых". Авторам таких уведомлений, конечно, хочется пожелать отправитьс…
8 Oct 2022, 18:52 UTC≈6,780 viewsread 8 August 2026
Сергей Егиев предлагает "перестать предъявлять претензии к крупным фармацевтическим компаниям, устанавливающим высокие цены на только что изобретенные лекарства". Его аргумент состоит в том, что до того, как лекарство (да и вообще любой новый товар) был изобретено, его цена была бесконечной, и компания, которая его изобрела, снизила цену с бесконечной до конечной. Думаю, что я продолжу предъявлять претензии к фармац…
1 Jul 2022, 08:17 UTC≈7,710 viewsread 8 August 2026
Когда будут новые посты в этом канале? Возможно, к осени мне удастся как-то наладить дела и написать обо всем, о чем хотелось: о понятии равновесия в современных макроэкономических моделях, о фискальной теории уровня цен, о различиях между экономической историей и исторической экономикой (и почему последняя - совершенно бесполезна), о том, почему война всегда неэффективна по Парето, о том, что общего у спора двух Кем…
30 Dec 2021, 14:47 UTC≈9,570 viewsread 8 August 2026
Для «ЭКОНС» рассказал о новых исследованиях коммуникации денежно-кредитной политики - когда направленность ДКП рынки определяют по выражению лица и тону голоса председателя, а также про новый учебник по экономике суверенных дефолтов. Боюсь, что тема суверенных дефолтов в 2022 году станет актуальной для многих стран, особенно если в США ускорится нормализация ДКП. После Нового года попробую написать ещё чуть более ра…
30 Dec 2021, 14:38 UTC≈7,340 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Econsonline
«Эконс» попросил известных экономистов рассказать о самых важных и впечатливших их исследованиях, опубликованных в 2021 году. Сохраняйте список рекомендаций! https://econs.online/articles/ekonomika/samye-vazhnye-ekonomicheskie-issledovaniya-i-otkrytiya-2021-goda/
12 Oct 2021, 18:26 UTC≈8,650 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
#ЧтоПочитать у новых нобелевских лауреатов по экономике
12 Oct 2021, 18:23 UTC≈8,040 viewsread 8 August 2026
Что ещё почитать о нобелевских лауреатах Небольшая подборка материалов, которые мне понравились: 📝 Заметка Сергея Измалкова о нобелевских лауреатах на ЭКОНС 🔍 Пост Григория Баженова на его канале об основных достижениях лауреатов 📄 The Bell и РБК с комментариями Рубена Ениколопова 🤬 Как другой нобелевский лауреат и большой противник государственного вмешательства в экономику Джеймс Бьюкенен отреагировал…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @growthecon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 762,905 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@growthecon named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@econkadat
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Econ. Growth Channel” (@growthecon), 3,848 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/growthecon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.