Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

kremlin in the boys room

@whitekremlin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,010subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001192836533
TypeChannel
Username@whitekremlin
Created29 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/whitekremlin

Growth

3,0103,0203,0156 August 2026 — 3,020 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,020 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,019 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,012 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,010 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,009–3,022 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:473,010-2
10 Aug 2026, 02:413,012-7
6 Aug 2026, 19:303,019-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:023,020no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:513,020first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,165 reactions across 18 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍53124.5%
41119.0%
😁32014.8%
🔥1416.51%
😎1215.59%
🕊914.20%
👻813.74%
🤔723.33%
💯683.14%
💊542.49%
🥱472.17%
💔361.66%
😈331.52%
👎271.25%
❤‍🔥241.11%
👏210.97%
😢210.97%
🎉180.831%
🤮120.554%
🥴90.416%
11 further kinds271.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2025 to 26 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 18 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @whitekremlin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2025 to 26 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2025, 17:40 UTC≈18,600 views127 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Тут, правда, следует оговориться: бесплодность или беспомощность — это необязательно что-то плохое само по себе. Внимательный читатель мог заметить, что консерватизму я скорее симпатизирую, а антиглобализм скорее не люблю. Но это мои личные предпочтения: люди могут быть тру-консерваторами, а могут быть деглобалистами. Под бесплодностью следует понимать то, что из приверженности идее не следует ничего практического —

👍84❤‍🔥209😁5💊3🐳2🤔2🕊1

26 Aug 2025, 17:06 UTC≈14,500 views145 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Второй беспомощной идеей следовало бы признать проповедь «конца глобализма». Нет никаких сомнений, что престарелые кретины, ответственные за то, что планета проходит 2020е в режиме «хардкор», конечно же, могут положить конец глобализации. Проблема в том, что пока что абсолютно любое, каждое первое общество, изолированное себя от глобального мира волею своих владык, тщится-стремится в этот глобальный мир вернуться. Р

🔥86👍395💊5❤‍🔥3👎2🤷‍♂2😁2

24 Aug 2025, 16:15 UTC≈10,100 views138 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Современный консерватизм скорее умер; это очевидно всем, кроме слоников-базовичков, полюбивших в последние 5-7 лет называть всех подряд «соевыми», троллить цветноволосых людей, феминизм, психотерапию, людей на пару оттенков кожи темнее (в то и, наоборот, радикально светлее), иногда — обращаться к религии, но исключительно в противовес «всем этим «ниграм и пидорам», а не к Богу. И считать, что это-де и есть современны

👍8525💊11👎6🔥5🤔2😢2🎉1

18 Aug 2025, 14:58 UTC≈7,610 views152 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот чем хороши демократии даже в нынешнем, довольно незавидном, состоянии 1. Включаешь полноценную интернет-цензуру благодаря консенсусу двух ведущих партий 2. Ожидание: интернет-компании из Америки падают ниц 3. Реальность: тебя изысканно шлют к чёртовой матери на бланке юридической организации. Отдельно доставляет формулировка "American businesses do not surrender their First Amendment rights because a foreign bu

😎115🎉14👍8👏54🤔3👎1👻1

18 Aug 2025, 10:52 UTC≈7,230 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Во-первых, всё так. Во-вторых, относительно русской тоски по селу всё не так. Традиция тосковать по традиционному селу вполне себе объяснима и для выходцев из масковской интеллигенции, и для селюков. В России любителей воздыхать об империи принято называть «булкохрустами» и высмеивать, мол-де, они себя все представляют графьями да князьями, а самих бы выпорол барин на конюшне. (И пофиг, что к 1916 году 96% земли при

🤔32👍26💊75👎2😁2🐳1🥴1

17 Aug 2025, 16:15 UTC≈5,600 views104 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Идея попаданческого романа в духе «Квантового скачка»: герой попадает в разные версии российского прошлого из коридора, где он может выбрать события, время, инвентарь, но каждый раз в игре рано или поздно происходит очередная Чудовищная Ошибка, его перемалывают системой (убивают или сажают), и он снова попадает в коридор. В какой-то из моментов ему удается попасть в его настоящее, и он наконец-то понимает, что менять

47💔36😢14😁5❤‍🔥1🔥1

15 Aug 2025, 23:10 UTC≈5,350 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

21👏15😁15😐2🥱1

12 Aug 2025, 14:17 UTC≈6,930 views162 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А вот что лично меня зацепило в интервью Невзорова: оказалось ещё раз удивительно и забавно видеть что воинствующий атеизм, в отличие от atheismus vulgaris, ВИДИМО, — тупиковая, очень глупая, и по всей видимости, провинциальная ветвь. Собственно, на фронтире современной философии, насколько я могу судить своим неэкспертным взглядом, вопрос существования абсолюта с повестки дня не сходит. Невзоров, впрочем, с происход

👍65🔥36🥱288😎6🗿5👎4💯4

1 Aug 2025, 18:26 UTC≈6,330 views115 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kirillrodionov

Сегодняшний вечер доказывает, что каждый автор, рано или поздно, находит своего благодарного читателя.

😁9610😢5🤔4

26 Jul 2025, 14:15 UTC≈9,080 views184 reactions25 Starsread 8 August 2026

В Штатах MAGA-движение трещит в самом своём фундаменте из-за скандала вокруг файлов Эпштейна. Рейтинг Демократической партии опускается до минимумов 1990х гг., когда, казалось, республиканцы владели страной безраздельно (и были не чета той аморфно-послушной массе, которая называется ими сейчас). Woke-тренды в рекламе умерли окончательно; элегантный гвоздь в крышку гроба заколотила шикарная Сидни Суини. Умерло BLM-дви

106👍43🤔17💊6🕊4👎3🎉2🤮2

22 Jul 2025, 11:59 UTC≈6,220 views130 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Верховный суд перенес заседание о запрете сатанизма в России на фоне смерти главы ВС Ирины Подносовой» Ну почему сразу перенос заседания, просто сразу поехала на выездное. Ну, как в колонию или СИЗО к осужденным суд переносят.

👻80😈28😁12🤮4🔥32💯1

18 Jul 2025, 12:39 UTC≈7,390 views76 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я ДЖВА ГОДА УЖЕ ЭТО ПИШУ, индейцы блин Зоркий глаз https://t.me/NoodleRemoverPlus/8873

👍508🤮6😈5😁4🥱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @whitekremlin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 678,413 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kremlin in the boys room” (@whitekremlin), 3,010 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whitekremlin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.