Channel
@nadotextit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
569subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001837540905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nadotextit |
| Description | Я писатель Владимир Шевелёв. Здесь я публикую свои нон-фикшен тексты. Мои книги легко гуглятся: "Разведенный эксперт по семейным отношениям", роман "Иллюзия контроля", нон-фикшен "Камень", повесть |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nadotextit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 569 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 569 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,170 |
| Reactions total | 105 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
138 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 33 | 23.9% | |
| ❤ | 32 | 23.2% | |
| 😱 | 19 | 13.8% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 11.6% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 10.9% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 7.25% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 4.35% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.62% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
10 лет встречались, теперь долгожданная для Джорджины свадьба. Через 2 года развод, Джорджина не будет вылезать с ток-шоу, где обвинит Роналду в абьюзе и еще 100 грехах. Выяснится, что все 12 лет она жутко страдала. Скриньте.
💯4😁3🔥1
А вот по этой афише я бы подумал, что фильм про измену жены😁
😁13
Посмотрел я энтот Disclosure Day Стивена Спилберга. Не знаю, можно ли вообще говорить о спойлерах, когда на афише серый инопланетянин и фильм называется «День разоблачения»😁😁 Ну ладно, спойлер: инопланетяне существуют! А еще нужно ставить сетки на окна, чтобы не залетали птицы. Фильм прям слабенький, фантастики мало, а фэнтези-моментов много. Ориентирован, видимо, на американскую аудиторию. Но любопытно другое. В…
🔥3❤2🤨1
Photo, posted without a caption
Как слова формируют реальность («базовый минимум и роскошный максимум») Идем дальше. Вы наверняка видели эти рилсы, где девушки озвучивают список хотелок по отношению к мужчинам и заносят их в категорию базового минимума и роскошного максимума. Но начать нужно не с этого. В инфополе, ориентированном на девушек и женщин, есть основные слова, формирующие реальность: «мужчина должен» и «я ценна сама по себе». «Мужч…
👏5🔥2
Как слова формируют реальность (на примере "личных границ") Продолжение этого поста. По аналогии с примером из Андреева про мышление (океан или дыхание), рассмотрим слова "личные границы". О том, что у нас есть личные границы, поп-психология сообщила нам относительно недавно: в начале 90-х вышла книга "Барьеры". Насмотревшись рилсов из поп-психологии, человек попадает в мир, где реальность "личных границ" неоспор…
💯5❤4
Зашёл в книжный.
😁7🔥4😱2
Как слова формируют реальность Одна из моих любимых тем. Мне это постоянно бросается в глаза, не знаю, как вам. Пример. Читаем у Даниила Андреева: «Забив, как пробка, дыхательные пути мысли множества людей». Дыхательные пути мысли! Хорошая метафора. И действительно, мысль же можно удушить, лишить кислорода? Уподобление мышления дыханию. Прекрасно. Незаметно сформировалась картинка мира, в которой оперирует абстр…
❤5👍2💯1
За Уругвай я стал болеть в 2002 году. Понравились техничные игроки, страсть и упорство. Квинтэссенцией уругвайского стиля стал знаменитый момент на ЧМ 2010 года, когда в матче с Ганой великий Луис Суарес на последней минуте матча руками выбил мяч из своих ворот. Получил, естественно, красную карточку и уже вне пределов поля наблюдал за тем, как ганец запустил мяч с пенальти в перекладину. Уругвай в итоге выиграл. Эт…
❤6👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3
За большие деньги могу пожелать вам удачи! Работает!
😁5❤2
Чего??? "В следующей жизни" же было!
😱12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nadotextit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 838,887 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Манускрипт времен постправды” (@nadotextit), 569 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadotextit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.