Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مَعلِش .

@DlI_lD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

53,516subscribers

+131 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437686723
TypeChannel
Username@DlI_lD
Descriptionلو معرفتش توصف شعورك هنا هنوصف هو لك✨.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DlI_lD

Growth

53,38553,53153,4586 August 2026 — 53,385 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,481 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,526 subscribers9 August 2026 — 53,531 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,487 subscribers11 August 2026 — 53,477 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,487 subscribers13 August 2026 — 53,427 subscribers14 August 2026 — 53,516 subscribers53,5166 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +131. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,363–53,553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:4453,516+89
13 Aug 2026, 13:1653,427-60
12 Aug 2026, 09:5253,487+10
11 Aug 2026, 11:5353,477-10
10 Aug 2026, 13:0253,487-44
9 Aug 2026, 14:1253,531+5
8 Aug 2026, 14:3053,526+45
7 Aug 2026, 13:4753,481+96
6 Aug 2026, 20:0153,385first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.47%
avg views ÷ 53,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,000
107 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
107
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 107 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held107 (23 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total427,899
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
494
Videos
16
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,138
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 107 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
356
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DlI_lD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 23:35 UTC8 viewsread 14 August 2026

أنا أيضًا ‏في قلبي " ريتا " ‏يا " درويش " ‏لكنها .. اضغط للتكمله

14 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC66 viewsread 14 August 2026

مُبهِرةٌ أنتِ و مُذهلةْ ‏لا محلَّ لكِ من ..انضم للمزيد

14 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC132 viewsread 14 August 2026

إين يذهب المرء ؟! إذا تراكمت ..انضم للتكمله

14 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC183 viewsread 14 August 2026

"حاشا لِحُسنكَ أن يُصاغَ بأسطرٍ ‏أنتَ الفَصاحةُ و ..اضغط للتكمله

14 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC228 viewsread 14 August 2026

يا بليغة الملامح ‏يا فصيحة العينين ‏يا امرأةً لا ..انضم للتكمله

14 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC255 viewsread 14 August 2026

‏لستِ امُرأةٌ عَادِيه أنتِ .. للمزيد

14 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC307 viewsread 14 August 2026

يقفن أمام المرآة ليتجمَّلْنَّ ‏وحدُها تقفُ ..قراءة المزيد

14 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC356 viewsread 14 August 2026

الاربعون شبيها خرافة الحياة ليست ..انضم للمزيد

14 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC401 viewsread 14 August 2026

الاربعون شبيها خرافة الحياة ليست ..انضم للمزيد

14 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC443 viewsread 14 August 2026

لا مثيل لكِ لم ينافسكِ في الجمال أحد لم يتفوق عليكِ إلا ..قراءة المزيد

14 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC473 viewsread 14 August 2026

دائما تتباهين بعيناكِ ما المميز فيهما لا أعرف هل لمجرد أن ..اضغط للتكملة

14 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC551 viewsread 14 August 2026

ركضت في البداية لأني أردت ‏ثم لأني ..اضغط للتكملة

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @DlI_lD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 137,845 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝚅𝙴𝚁𝙾𝙽𝙸𝙲𝙰 .
@SACHERTI · 165,956
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
- ❝ الحيوانيميا ❞
@alhyunemia · 147,972
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
اهو ده إللي صار | كوميديا سوداء
@zahre2000 · 289,820
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
مَبتهمنيِش .
@Diilen · 114,672
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مَعلِش .” (@DlI_lD), 53,516 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DlI_lD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.