﴿إِذْ نَادَىٰ رَبَّهُ﴾ ..﴿فَاسْتَجَبْنَا لَهُ﴾ .

Channel
مَعلِش .
@DlI_lD
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
55,657subscribers
+2,272 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001437686723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DlI_lD |
| Description | لو معرفتش توصف شعورك هنا هنوصف هو لك✨. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DlI_lD |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 11:21 | 55,657 | +9 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 00:11 | 55,648 | +96 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 06:38 | 55,552 | +42 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:51 | 55,510 | +114 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:37 | 55,396 | +117 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:47 | 55,279 | -31 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:50 | 55,310 | +96 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:40 | 55,214 | +179 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:35 | 55,035 | -69 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:50 | 55,104 | +95 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:07 | 55,009 | +70 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 54,939 | +109 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 54,830 | +77 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 54,753 | +140 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:01 | 54,613 | +78 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:47 | 54,535 | -75 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 54,610 | +77 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:01 | 54,533 | +94 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:16 | 54,439 | +31 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:01 | 54,408 | first reading |
Engagement
954 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 202 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.10%
- avg views ÷ 55,657 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,840
- 252 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 252
- of 954 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 252 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 954 (23 July 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 715,691 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 510
- Videos
- 16
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 8,593
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 42
- of 954 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1,100
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DlI_lD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 954 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 252 posts held from the last 30 days (3.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
- أدعيـة للتَوفيّق في الدَراسـة وسِرعـة الحُفظ والفِهـم :
أمَّا أنا فقدْ أَرحَلُ عن أكثرِ الأماكِنِ حُبًّا لِقَلبي لمُجرَّدِ أنَّ .. قراءة المزيد
سقَط العزم يا شَقيق الروح حَسِبنا أننا لا نهون و .. انضم للتكملة
لا تهملني ثم تعود صدقني لن ...اضغط لتكملة
لما اغار عليك مو قصدي اني امنعك من الي حولك انا بس ما ...متابعة القراءة
يَخون الإنسَان نفسَه ، حِين .. انضم للمتابعة
سَـتوريات للتلي دينية 🌷🦋
ليش تبچين 💔💔!!
العلاقات المُـحرمة 🦋🦋
واخيراً صار بنترست بلتليييي 😔⁉️.
بينترست التيليجرام 🦋
Showing the 12 most recent of 954 posts we hold for @DlI_lD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,0836 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,8265 postsFACT :
@FCB_V · 89,6872 postsهالفترة بعنوان :
@NO_6C · 31,7182 postsTrend
@ci4rrr · 18,1412 postsمَشاعر ألك
@tl1ll · 56,3972 postsبوست :
@AUUQ1 · 43,2121 postقصة نزوح 🇵🇸
@Gaza00R · 2321 postشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 71,1151 postمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,0551 postثروناو :
@cf67c · 45,0761 postبرودكاست :
@ffccbb_m · 6,8601 post" 𝐒𝐈𝐑𝐈𝐔𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐑 ✨"
@ha9_u · 3341 postمَلاك .
@llivrz · 21,2401 post⁰⁶٠⁹⁹
@ph_6wrd6 · 1,9651 postRAY
@ray7ix · 31 post- حِچايات عراقيّة .
@rsr2z · 44,3551 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@DI_IlD · 3,21125 postsلـ أصحابي .
@Dl_IlD · 3,35720 postsالسلام عليكم :
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,0835 postsTrend
@ci4rrr · 18,1415 postsرسائل 11.11
@zsszp1 · 29,9935 postsمُذكرات .
@iq2201 · 6,5364 posts- ظنــون .
@MoO_xo20 · 2,0563 posts•شتات|ˢʰᵃᵗᵃᵗ.
@ee_ii7 · 2,6953 postsشعر عربي فصيح
@fluent_poetry1 · 60,2143 postsعُمق
@rn32r · 2,5683 postsـ عَذّب .
@ull_x7 · 4,8033 postsليتنا نلتقي
@zzssz10 · 39,1493 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,9092 postsعتاب
@bggcp · 42,2122 postsرُبما نَلتقي .
@DII_lID · 35,0471 postMooD :
@DicciD · 16,2361 postشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 71,1151 postهالفترة بعنوان :
@NO_6C · 31,7181 postقناة الاعلانات( البيشنت)🦷
@apexdental1 · 1,5781 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,08324 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 45,07616 postsهالفترة بعنوان :
@NO_6C · 31,71816 postsمَلاك .
@llivrz · 21,24015 posts- حِچايات عراقيّة .
@rsr2z · 44,35511 postsFACT :
@FCB_V · 89,6877 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 71,1157 postsحقيقة :
@literallyme8 · 30,5147 postsمَيخالف .
@OOIIIEEE · 56,0557 postsأنوار القرآن .
@ssdfgtry · 38,2407 postsمَشاعر ألك
@tl1ll · 56,3977 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 85,8266 postsتوهِين .
@eoivnr · 81,7446 posts᷂فراشَه ღ.
@HH_lEl · 44,4766 postsTrend
@ci4rrr · 18,1415 postsالسلام عليكم :
@fccbma · 38,3355 postsحَزن اهلنا .
@esecs · 65,7794 postsاحساس وشعر .
@Hl_HII · 117,3604 posts. ࿔ نجمة رَوانِ
@lRlTI · 76,5204 postsبوست :
@AUUQ1 · 43,2122 postsحرفياً :
@literally_0 · 28,7212 postsحُبَّ الله :
@ll8lI4 · 21,2732 postsريبوست
@iibost · 65,0301 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@zzssz10 · 39,149119 postsمحمد الجيلاني .
@M_Q_X · 34,48074 posts•شتات|ˢʰᵃᵗᵃᵗ.
@ee_ii7 · 2,69552 postsمُذكرات .
@iq2201 · 6,53634 postsهالفترة بعنوان :
@NO_6C · 31,71829 postsعُمق
@rn32r · 2,56829 postsرسائل 11.11
@zsszp1 · 29,99326 posts-V60
@khvip10 · 93021 postsعتاب
@bggcp · 42,21219 posts- ظنــون .
@MoO_xo20 · 2,05618 postsعذرناك
@eadhrnak · 2,51116 postsحقيقة :
@literallyme8 · 30,51416 postsلـ لؤي١.
@llll8iil · 2,03914 postsخالد أحمد | Khaled Ahmed
@KhaledF_404 · 28112 postsشَمسك .
@IIU4F · 71,11510 posts-حَبيبتِي السَّمراء.
@Narla2 · 71,19710 posts-﮼أُنثى رَقيقة .
@DRT86 · 41,9098 posts🦢
@laivl · 37,9278 postsمَلاك .
@llivrz · 21,2408 postsالسلام عليكم :
@SUDEn_MOMEnt · 48,0838 postsميمز متكئكئين
@warlann · 12,1888 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 45,0767 postsMooD :
@DicciD · 16,2367 postsمُصاب بها.
@zzrrcr · 22,2766 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@DlI_lD named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026 · confirmed gone 2 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 22 October 2026 – 22 October 2026 · confirmed gone 23 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@DII_lID · 35,047#1
@tv_wlil · 11,755#2
@elfno · 17,327#3
@Fi_dii · 17,442#4
@RIlAKSI3 · 12,325#5
@I_5_d · 6,813#6
@noona_88 · 8,944#7
@a_espresso1 · 8,682#8
@ma_L7ii · 20,117#9
@t_messy · 6,994#10
@Mi50s · 3,089#11
@Eee_9_1 · 10,397#12
@siin_24 · 7,930#13
@m5dreen · 9,222#14
@DI_Il2 · 5,964#15
@N_nCv0 · 16,315#16
@lll_mi13 · 10,216#17
@maqay11 · 10,331#18
@tv_wil · 10,917#19
@e10_l · 5,863#20
@cole_q · 2,466#21
@ahmdssh · 1,689#22
@flflili · 4,150#23
@Kranj9 · 4,593#24
@vwwuv · 9,678#25
@no0on_20 · 3,324#26
@MMi0M · 9,419#27
@lave_7 · 10,527#28
@doc_CrII7 · 6,367#29
@Y_memz · 3,260#30
@II_C7II · 2,331#31
@YZVIP1 · 936#32
@k1kvv · 3,803#33
@CllOC · 17,898#34
@CCPBB0 · 11,419#35
@ee_ii7 · 2,695#36
@ml_doa · 5,348#37
@AMJJDI · 2,655#38
@II8II5 · 8,188#39
@DEPTH02 · 32,963#40
@VPC_R · 5,169#41
@IMI_I3 · 1,424#42
@EX6_0 · 3,729#43
@ieeyr · 1,373#44
@P2TTP · 12,480#45
@like_llooosh · 4,058#46
@xYomiat · 23#47
@swangirl6 · 10,912#48
@Mu_kc · 4,177#49
@yaqin41 · 3#50
@tarakumat2 · 1,354#51
@LZDT5 · 4,785#52
@Niescafeh · 6,036#53
@cu_te11 · 4,574#54
@StudentsDM · 3,665#55
@vip_8m10 · 659#56
@fatom_mkh · 4,047#57
@MH2lR · 15,865#58
@Diilen · 116,841#59
@bVVKV8 · 893#60
@zxxzax · 2,585#61
@io_uvl · 2,206#62
@MoOo2000 · 1,617#63
@yemenn0 · 2,177#64
@tittn · 3,674#65
@hom1_e · 2,249#66
@vouoa · 6,898#67
@EX2_0 · 6,230#68
@VIP_I9_2 · 2,288#69
@ex24i · 802#70
@OP1ll · 859#71
@wee_eew · 899#72
@DCL_7 · 1,789#73
@Majaraat · 58,096#74
@hayaa_0 · 74,597#75
@rzAAhAtsh · 2,968#76
@lIIM6 · 29,234#77
@TZYMWDB · 1,737#78
@Gazal_G_1 · 1,636#79
@lI9ll9lll · 4,920#80
@EEZ81 · 11,682#81
@siin_25 · 146#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DII_lID · 35,047
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@Ssll_77 · 46,841
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026
@AnaoantmA · 30,587
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@FlIII · 78,322
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 August 2026
@allahomajantk · 81,450
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
@SACHERTI · 156,091
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@APR8IL · 41,579
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@H1HOD · 37,690
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
@DEPTH02 · 32,963
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
@Majaraat · 58,096
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@bomba_tymon · 35,882
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
@alhyunemia · 138,513
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@sawadRI1 · 32,281
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
@s54ou · 42,777
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@v_news_iq · 62,357
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@Gibran_Khalill · 50,747
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
@T3_ll · 45,777
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@zahre2000 · 272,393
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@hayaa_0 · 74,597
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@llA0lI · 54,260
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@Diilen · 116,841
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@Ghassan_kanfani · 20,106
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
@Jalal_Aldiyn · 29,767
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَعلِش .” (@DlI_lD), 55,657 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DlI_lD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.