я не испытывал страха смерти. быть может, думал я, она уже произошла.

Channel
9O2
@killme9O2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,187subscribers
-198 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001346407039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @killme9O2 |
| Description | ✉️ реклама: @evaaveev ✉️ писать сюда: @mortaparis ✨реклама (цена/ отзывы/ свободные даты): @reklama9O2 🩸глубокий порез на теле своей семьи: @mrtaprs 🫂 чат подписчиков: t.me/+3thKwP_p2OFiMGYy (если ссылка не функционирует, писать @evaaveev) |
| Created | 23 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/killme9O2 |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 38,187 | -37 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:02 | 38,224 | -7 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 38,231 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 38,241 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 38,256 | +17 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 38,239 | -15 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 38,254 | +2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 38,252 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:03 | 38,258 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:14 | 38,268 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 38,262 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 38,261 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 38,263 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 38,273 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 38,263 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 38,267 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 38,270 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 38,280 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:59 | 38,300 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 38,307 | first reading |
Engagement
234 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.3%
- avg views ÷ 38,187 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,100
- 124 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 124
- of 234 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 73 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 234 (3 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 631,894 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,090
- Videos
- ≈15
- Links
- ≈32
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 770
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 135
- of 234 we hold a reading for · 58%
- Most on one post
- 27
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @killme9O2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 234 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
люблю ли я тебя ? я люблю, люблю, несмотря ни на что и благодаря всему, любил, люблю и буду любить, будешь ли ты груба со мной или ласкова, моя или чужая. всё равно люблю.
пожалуйста, не уезжай.
Говорят, жизнь покажет, как карта ляжет. Однако это не совсем так. В начале игры, то бишь, жизни, вам раздают карты, но то, как вы ими сыграете – это уже полностью ваша воля. Поэтому не стоит полагаться на судьбу, ведь именно вы её вершите. Некоторые жульничают, кто-то идет во-банк, а кто-то просчитывает каждый шаг. Любая тактика имеет место быть, – выбирайте свою.
на горизонте темно, я лежу в листве, темный-темный сентябрь, на земле темно и в небе тоже темно, и темно внутри.
какое сердце надо иметь, я не знаю, чтобы такого, как я, суметь полюбить.
где-то через полчаса мне захотелось кого-нибудь увидеть. когда долго смотришь на море, начинаешь скучать по людям, а когда долго смотришь на людей — по морю.
.
- раним67%
- жажду ранить43%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
«некоторым мечтам лучше бы не сбываться». запись в дневнике, 1913
и течет твоя душа в мою.
возможно, причина, по которой эта ночь выглядит такой красивой, не в этих звездах или огнях, а в нас самих.
«К» Мы путали правду с осколками мнений Искали друг друга среди отражений Не ставлю вопросов не жду объяснений У каждой причины свой привкус сомнений
Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @killme9O2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
.
- раним67%
- жажду ранить43%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
быть
- беспредельно близко65%
- неистово далеко41%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
быть
- мечом68%
- раной32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
.
- поменять человека59%
- поменять человека41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 60 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@sejkxxx · 34 postsсвалка дурных воспоминаний.
@spendthewinter · 124 postsℎ𝑡𝑡𝑝𝑠://𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠.𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑖.🐙//
@doriancerise · 23 postsHobihorser
@jung_hoswag · 183 postsКофейный следователь🐺
@kofeyinyisledovatel · 113 posts𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚌
@seraphic06 · 1283 postsThe labyrinth of dreams
@Dreams_of_despair · 162 postsмёртвая псина!
@bffhjldy · 592 postsgreen land
@grnla · 462 postsklyu4enkovskii
@klyu4enkovskii · 1312 postsCliché
@lescliches · 22 postsлитрома́нтия.
@litromancie · 2,3882 postsКриминальный авторитет.
@scjkxw · 92 postsᅠ
@sortoss · 162 postsА Л Ь Б А | стихи
@stalbas_2 · 4602 postsкитобойня
@thewhalingyard · 762 postsшов (closed)
@weathernur · 552 postsЮля Вишня (DEVILSS)
@CherryYuli · 931 postdear hurt why him? ПЕРЕЕЗД.
@HWAWCK2 · 241 postрадостные события из моей жизни
@Hf8lyXkBVAJhZDg6 · 151 postХedd. XD
@Lashistorias · 8861 postаокигахара
@akghr22 · 1961 postВетхий собор // alexxsirrr
@alexxsirrr · 111 postalvwvm
@alvwvn · 51 postдиссоциация
@an8_j · 241 postasullm
@asullm · 1841 post𝕭𝖊𝖙𝖊𝖑
@bettttell · 1211 postравновесие безудержной мелодии | архив
@cautivadorra · 71 postchse
@chsee1 · 391 posty’dxee
@chucaii · 61 postДарья Типчук / Большие девочки 2
@dashka_v_rashke · 5,0341 post!ELI88X.
@el188X · 81 postmptyspace
@elissgedd · 1,0611 postɜᴀᴋᴩыᴛиᴇ. 𝘿𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙎𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙨.
@fawuoqn · 71 post𝐕𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐀𝐆𝐄
@gabri14_0 · 241 postНе Илья Муромец
@hamili_rus1 · 201 postпсихохикка.
@hkkssis · 1181 postKINO MURATOVA
@kinomuratova · 1721 post𝐤𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐭
@kkrost1 · 1431 postсен сұлу
@meagainnme · 801 postмонолог в 3:15.
@monologat · 171 post՞߹ _ ߹՞
@muimtu · 401 postშთაგონების
@mysavedmessage · 311 postkiss
@perraspera3 · 6551 postErofoXxx
@photohdarm · 51 postпо касательной
@pokasatelnoi · 4841 postqqq. . .(!)h4nter
@qmwmmq · 231 post/закрыто/пристанище самаэ́ля.
@samaeltoki · 111 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@reklama9O2 · 14315 postsПривычка чувствовать
@Kkk_kkK_Kkk_kkK_kk · 2054 postsmort à paris
@mrtaprs · 4,2674 postsс. ти́шина
@cryinemo · 7191 postmort
@daryoooon · 2151 postзасвечена моя летняя плёнка
@letnayaplenka · 1,6591 posttout est poésie
@mavieestpoesie · 2,9081 postИз пепла чувств
@ockolkichyvstv · 121 postПричал понимания
@prichalponimaniya · 4541 postsay my name
@reichwur · 4681 post𝚂𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚢
@singuval · 5041 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mrtaprs · 4,267#1
@etoznakmag · 636,947#2
@parisianorgy · 2,440#3
@meta_morphosis · 1,181#4
@L9stNight · 7,387#5
@spokoiinolove · 6,025#6
@demonsinmybrain · 695#7
@psy_storeez · 1,729#8
@lediables · 416#9
@poigrayemm · 44#10
@asttrsay · 7,224#11
@bezyteshnimi · 11,825#12
@maybeyou14 · 362#13
@chaikafm · 5,144#14
@znaewmary · 664#15
@pmml_pozdn · 7,442#16
@sunglareofmysoul · 470#17
@mmuae · 1,290#18
@ruh_parcassi · 85,879#19
@etoam · 23,207#20
@cianneli · 4,707#21
@tatasifasi · 7,880#22
@badnotebook · 2,894#23
@twiistt · 858#24
@hranimoe · 7,221#25
@silentkisses · 965#26
@introspection_vnutri · 360#27
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339#28
@yourstion · 2,320#29
@vslv_txt · 2,321#30
@evodays · 385,450#31
@petrovtel · 525,264#32
@kosti · 560,192#33
@kamikazewx · 1,153#34
@hiraamur · 2,832#35
@all500a · 3,880#36
@astro_juliaa · 212,063#37
@aweomees · 776#38
@astoldbylina · 7,226#39
@femalememes · 407,543#40
@Dobranebudett · 5,876#41
@niotkuda_ss · 3,222#42
@rutkismary · 333,341#43
@evkasup13 · 103,801#44
@moscowtinderr · 740,982#45
@white_lake_channel · 1,254#46
@pulsmoego · 7,516#47
@hushhuh · 19,577#48
@sanctasel · 3,469#49
@nalunetelegram · 77,749#50
@etelmo · 363#51
@naiznankumari · 20,908#52
@klyu4enkovskii · 131#53
@plastic_poets · 1,931#54
@astrogiks · 307,464#55
@goro_kirill · 171,579#56
@sadikroz · 1,049#57
@poytac · 615#58
@everydayrain · 237,557#59
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@poogood · 22,553
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
@nopity · 24,434
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 September 2026
@AphorismTG · 107,912
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@memoryofpoets · 94,189
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
@remark_tsitaty_aforizmy · 20,925
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“9O2” (@killme9O2), 38,187 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/killme9O2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.