Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for l o v e

Channel

l o v e

@etoam

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,483subscribers

+1,019 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001551694274
TypeChannel
Username@etoam
Created12 September 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/etoam

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@etoam/14160 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC@storiiz/1775086 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC1.003.6 hours
@etoam/14179 · this entry16 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC@storiiz/17836117 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC1.004.9 hours
@etoam/14185 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC@storiiz/17869421 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC1.008.2 hours
@etoam/14189 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC@storiiz/17891424 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC1.004.8 hours
@etoam/14191 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC@storiiz/17905526 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC1.0027 hours
@etoam/14191 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC@ritaebzeevablog/406531 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC1.006 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@storiiz5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.9 hoursthis entry (5–0)
@ritaebzeevablog5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0048 hoursthis entry (5–0)
@Aekaposhchat5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0018 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 86 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

22,46423,48322,973.57 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net +1,019. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,311–23,636 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:5823,483+15
9 Nov 2026, 18:2023,468+39
8 Nov 2026, 08:5923,429+22
7 Nov 2026, 02:2123,407+9
6 Nov 2026, 00:5623,398-1
5 Nov 2026, 01:3823,399+15
4 Nov 2026, 01:4023,384-7
3 Nov 2026, 01:2823,391+13
2 Nov 2026, 02:4623,378+2
31 Oct 2026, 00:3523,376-18
30 Oct 2026, 02:5523,394+8
29 Oct 2026, 04:4923,386-3
28 Oct 2026, 04:0523,389+7
27 Oct 2026, 00:5523,382+11
25 Oct 2026, 23:1523,371+11
25 Oct 2026, 00:0523,360+20
24 Oct 2026, 00:1023,340+20
23 Oct 2026, 03:0523,320+4
22 Oct 2026, 02:0923,316+10
20 Oct 2026, 23:2023,306first reading

Engagement

131 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.1%
avg views ÷ 23,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,760
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 131 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held131 (19 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total263,950
Reactions total5,348
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 05:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

23,097 reactions across 130 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤18,30779.3%
💔4,79020.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,097 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 23:17 UTC≈1,070 views76 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Не пытайтесь снова приблизить тех, кого Всевышний отдалил от вас

❤69💔7

9 Nov 2026, 23:30 UTC≈2,700 views109 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Наверное, самое странное в жизни — это наблюдать, как люди, которые когда-то были частью каждого твоего дня, постепенно превращаются в незнакомцев. Когда-то вы знали друг о друге каждую мелочь, делились самыми сокровенными мыслями, строили планы, смеялись до слёз и были уверены, что так будет всегда. Вы даже не задумывались, что однажды можете перестать общаться. А потом жизнь просто расставила всё по своим местам. И…

❤98💔11

9 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC≈3,720 views106 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Мой папа, моя первая любовь, моя первая опора и то плечо, которое никогда не подведет. Он навсегда останется моим бесценным благословением, вечной тенью, укрывающей меня от невзгод, и тем сердцем, которое чувствует меня раньше, чем я сама осознаю свою усталость. Будто он был создан для того, чтобы нести на себе все мои тяготы, даже не замечая этого. Папа, ты - та благодарность, которую невозможно выразить словами, и …

❤70💔36

8 Nov 2026, 22:37 UTC≈4,310 views139 reactionsread 11 November 2026

С возрастом начинаешь понимать, что не всякая близость означает искренность, не каждая улыбка говорит о добром отношении и не каждый человек, называющий тебя другом, действительно способен порадоваться твоему счастью. Самое болезненное — не когда человек уходит, а когда ты начинаешь вспоминать некоторые моменты и понимаешь, что многое видел не так, как было на самом деле. Но, наверное, и это необходимо пережить, чтоб…

❤97💔42

7 Nov 2026, 23:05 UTC≈4,560 views199 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Не объявляйте о своих проблемах миру в поисках сочувствия. Большинству все равно, многие не хотят их слышать, а некоторые рады, что они у вас есть. Обращайтесь со своими проблемами к Аллаху, Он всегда рядом, и только Он может помочь.

❤157💔42

7 Nov 2026, 00:19 UTC≈5,560 views182 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

«Тот, Кто создал трудный путь, наделил тебя силами преодолеть его.»

❤141💔41

5 Nov 2026, 22:03 UTC≈6,160 views177 reactionsread 11 November 2026

— Как бы люди ни нуждались в солнце, оно скрывается каждый день. При этом никто не плачет по поводу расставания с ним, потому что знает, что оно вернётся. Это и есть убеждённость. Но неужели вы убеждены в возвращении солнца и не убеждены в словах Всевышнего Аллаха: «Воистину, за каждой тягостью наступает облегчение»? Аллах непременно избавит от тягостей, покуда мы будем убеждены в Его обещании.

❤152💔25

4 Nov 2026, 22:50 UTC≈7,350 views175 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Себе и тебе. Наверное, нет такого человека, с которым не случалось что-то плохое, будь то предательство, потери, трудности и прочие сложности жизни. Проблемы есть у всех, они временные, но бывают. И если сердце искренно желает довольства Господа, не отвечает злом на зло, терпеливо, ради Него, проносит всю боль - такое не будет в убытке никогда. Ничто из потерянного не будет потерей для него - потому что Господь непр…

❤137💔38

3 Nov 2026, 23:03 UTC≈6,850 views178 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Завидовать на этой земле некому, и осуждать некого, потому что за каждой рассказанной историей, всегда прячется десяток не рассказанных.

❤137💔41

2 Nov 2026, 23:18 UTC≈7,050 views162 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Ради Бога, отучитесь, добрый друг мой, от этой манеры судить о делах людей, не зная их в подробности. Федор Михайлович Достоевский

❤129💔33

1 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC≈11,400 views173 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Каждый видит тебя в меру своего характера и в меру своей любви к тебе в его сердце. В своей жизни ты встретишь тех, кто видит в тебе самого доброго человека, и тех, кто видит в тебе самого худшего. Ты встретишь людей, которые забудут десятки прекрасных поступков, совершенных тобой для них, только потому, что однажды ты чего-то не смог сделать. И встретишь тех, кто будет искать тебе оправдания просто потому, что ты до…

❤135💔38

31 Oct 2026, 22:43 UTC≈8,290 views240 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Невидимой красной нитью соединены те, кому суждено встретиться, несмотря на время, место и обстоятельства. Нить может растянуться или спутаться, но никогда не порвется.

❤182💔58

Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @etoam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 11 posts on @etoam as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
1 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

imosya
@imosyaa · 7,789
#1
don’t kill my vibe
@dontkillmyviiibe · 7,524
#2
Grls pwr
@grlspwr1 · 10,608
#3
as told by lina
@astoldbylina · 7,589
#4
maktub
@takprednachertano · 14,356
#5
Bt Mn
@mbeytuga · 10,314
#6
eto moy vibe
@ettomoyvibe · 4,721
#7
m🌙
@markhoniii · 3,816
#8
𝐶𝐻𝑇𝑂𝑇𝑂𝐷𝑈𝑆𝐻𝐸𝑉𝑁𝑂𝐸💌
@chtotodushevnoe · 6,828
#9
вайщиъ
@vayshi1 · 26,284
#10
yasminspire
@yyasminspire · 4,180
#11
dáya diary
@dayaaash · 3,566
#12
365 new days
@evodays · 377,546
#13
чайка фм
@chaikafm · 5,192
#14
sHe
@sheisraree · 2,368
#15
un artiste
@unartistte · 12,141
#16
gentleSoul
@spishet · 4,139
#17
justthetwoofus
@just1he2ofus · 3,497
#18
Mon ami
@mon1amii · 75,809
#19
seli’s soul ☾
@sselissoul · 2,572
#20
fairy tale’s diary
@aaaaIIIIsh · 701
#21
luchiya
@luchiyazz · 3,542
#22
yatutpishu
@chkld7 · 7,580
#23
𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐗𝐄𝐄𝐗💘
@younxeex · 16,992
#24
takoy vot mood
@justdskmood · 4,039
#25
gadzhiieva.k
@gadzhiiiiievak · 6,275
#26
evkasup
@evkasup13 · 101,893
#27
Rada
@qqqradaa · 2,291
#28
amours mi
@amoursmi · 31,847
#29
Dobranebudet
@Dobranebudett · 6,009
#30
muse
@youronlymuse · 1,288
#31

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

365 new days
@evodays · 377,546
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
вайщиъ
@vayshi1 · 26,284
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 September 2026
Сегодня
@GoTodayGo · 121,739
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
MERZA_BEZAMM♥️
@merzabezamm1 · 54,124
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 26 August 2026
by lowwwasw 🩰
@lowwwasw · 28,940
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 7 September 2026
арабские цитаты
@arabskiyetsitatyyyyyyy · 24,359
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 September 2026
SABR
@SABR_ISLAMI · 28,898
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
𝐌𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐁☾︎
@mactub_off · 25,897
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 September 2026
9O2
@killme9O2 · 38,191
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
Makktina
@makktinaaa · 45,258
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 August 2026
Напоминай
@tuzakkir · 23,368
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 16 September 2026
with love
@withllove13 · 30,995
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
Стикерач
@stikery_emodzi_memy · 1,153,276
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
Чеченские песни / Чеченская Музыка
@chechen_musics · 74,855
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
Мари в большом городе
@naiznankumari · 20,325
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 25 September 2026
elisoullove
@elisoullove · 29,072
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 7 September 2026
vinchérie
@cvoenravka · 25,723
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 September 2026
amours mi
@amoursmi · 31,847
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
mutawwa
@mutawwa · 45,571
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“l o v e” (@etoam), 23,483 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etoam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.