Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Klang des Schweigenden

Channel

Klang des Schweigenden

@klangdesschweigenden

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,444subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002328510614
TypeChannel
Username@klangdesschweigenden
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/klangdesschweigenden

Growth

1,4231,4441,433.57 August 2026 — 1,423 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,426 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,438 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,439 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,444 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,420–1,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 22:131,444+5
13 Aug 2026, 05:471,439+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:101,438+12
7 Aug 2026, 08:371,426+3
7 Aug 2026, 06:471,423first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
105.0%
avg views ÷ 1,444 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,520
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,616
Reactions total346
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,035 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
69467.1%
🔥32030.9%
custom 5210956306952758910212.03%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,035reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC556 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Liebe ist nicht nur ein Gefühl. Gefühle kommen und gehen wie Wellen. Liebe ist die Entscheidung, zu bleiben, wenn die erste Euphorie vergangen ist. Sich zuzuhören, wenn Schweigen einfacher wäre. Sich die Hand zu reichen, wenn das Ego Abstand fordert. Wahre Liebe wird nicht ein einziges Mal entschieden. Sie wird jeden Morgen neu gewählt. Tag für Tag. Nicht weil man muss. Sondern weil zwei Menschen immer wiede

48🔥11

30 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC≈1,130 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Dominanz beginnt nicht dort, wo der Mensch andere beherrscht. Sondern dort, wo er sich selbst beherrscht. Das nennt man Disziplin.

26🔥14

28 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC≈1,080 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Perfekt wird der Mensch nicht dadurch, dass er Vollkommenheit erreicht. Sondern dadurch, dass er erkennt, dass das Leben gerade in seiner Unvollkommenheit vollkommen ist.

31🔥18

28 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,610 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Jeder von uns ist Kunst. Nicht erschaffen durch Perfektion. Sondern gezeichnet durch das Leben. Jede Wunde erzählt eine Geschichte. Jede Narbe beweist, dass die Seele weitergemalt hat, obwohl das Leben längst dunklere Farben gewählt hatte.

43🔥11

23 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,450 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Wer seinen Körper nur baut, erschafft eine Statue. Wer seinen Körper beherrscht, erschafft ein Werkzeug. Zwischen beiden liegen Welten!

22🔥16

21 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC≈3,270 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Der Mensch gibt oft auf, weil er heute keine Ergebnisse sieht. Dabei vergisst er: Ein Baum wächst jahrelang unsichtbar, bevor er Schatten spendet.

57🔥11custom 52109563069527589102

19 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,520 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ICH muss nicht glauben, besser zu sein als du. Es genügt, dass DU glaubst, ich könnte es sein. Denn der Vergleich entsteht NIE im Leben des anderen. Sondern im EIGENEN Kopf.

🔥2511

17 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC≈2,170 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Interessant ist nicht, was Menschen hinter deinem Rücken sagen. Interessant ist, dass sie schweigen, wenn du den Raum betrittst. Denn Worte verraten Meinungen. Schweigen verrät Respekt.

🔥279custom 52109563069527589106

14 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,870 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Wenn der Schwächste sagt: "Ich werde der Stärkste." lachen viele. Nur die Stärksten lachen nicht. Sie wissen, dass jeder Gipfelgang einmal ein erster Schritt war. Disziplin ist unsichtbar, bis ihre Ergebnisse sichtbar werden. Meditation wirkt bedeutungslos, bis der Mensch der Ruhigste im Raum ist. Geduld erscheint wie Zeitverlust, bis sie Früchte trägt. Der Mensch beurteilt Prozesse nach ihrem Anfang. Das Leb

34🔥27

13 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,390 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Die größte Rache ist nicht Vergeltung. Sondern Vergebung. Denn Vergebung ist kein Geschenk an den anderen. Sie ist die Freiheit, die der Mensch sich selbst schenkt.

47🔥17

12 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,700 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Der Mensch wartet auf den "richtigen Zeitpunkt". Das Leben wartet nicht. Es geschieht. Mit jedem Tag, an dem Du zögerst, entscheidest Du dich bereits. Denn auch Nichtstun ist eine Entscheidung.

30🔥18custom 52109563069527589102

9 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,760 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Freiheit verschwindet nicht mit einem Knall. Sie verschwindet mit der Gewöhnung. Denn jede Freiheit, die der Mensch freiwillig aufgibt, kehrt niemals als Sicherheit zurück.

25🔥18custom 52109563069527589103

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @klangdesschweigenden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 347,648 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Klang des Schweigenden” (@klangdesschweigenden), 1,444 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klangdesschweigenden.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.