Resta aggiornato sulle ultime analisi e discussioni sulla politica internazionale, le crisi globali e le dinamiche geopolitiche direttamente dalla voce autorevole dell'Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale.
www.ispionline.it
Created
18 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
9 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,762–27,770 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 16:46
27,766
-2
14 Aug 2026, 23:35
27,768
+3
13 Aug 2026, 16:08
27,765
-2
12 Aug 2026, 12:38
27,767
-1
11 Aug 2026, 15:55
27,768
-1
8 Aug 2026, 21:05
27,769
+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:41
27,767
+4
7 Aug 2026, 03:00
27,763
-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:32
27,765
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 27,766 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,350
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.411%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
27 (24 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
117,410
Reactions total
482
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,000
Links
≈2,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
482 reactions across 27 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤔
154
32.0%
❤
100
20.7%
👍
87
18.0%
😡
76
15.8%
🔥
15
3.11%
👎
13
2.70%
😢
13
2.70%
😁
11
2.28%
🤩
5
1.04%
😱
4
0.83%
🎉
1
0.207%
👏
1
0.207%
🤨
1
0.207%
🤯
1
0.207%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 482reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇦🇫 Cinque anni di solitudine: l’Afghanistan dopo il ritorno dei talebani
A cinque anni dal ritorno dei talebani al potere, l’Afghanistan resta in uno stallo diplomatico: il regime non è pienamente riconosciuto dalla comunità internazionale, ma ha progressivamente riaperto alcuni canali con diversi Paesi. Intanto, la crisi umanitaria si aggrava, spinta dall’insicurezza alimentare e dai rimpatri forzati di milioni di …
🇮🇱 Israele: fronti aperti, urne in vista
Israele resta impegnato su quattro fronti — Cisgiordania, Libano, Siria e Gaza — mentre il caso di Qusra accende nuove tensioni e provoca la dura reazione di Washington e Bruxelles contro la violenza dei coloni. L’esercito israeliano è intervenuto nell’area per smantellare alcuni avamposti illegali, mentre l’Ue chiede a Israele azioni concrete. Il tutto avviene mentre si avvi…
🇺🇸 Primarie Usa: stress test per Trump
Le primarie in sei Stati americani mostrano un Partito democratico ancora diviso tra moderati e progressisti, mentre l’endorsement di Trump resta decisivo per gran parte dei candidati repubblicani. Ma alcune sconfitte mostrano i limiti del suo sostegno, a meno di tre mesi dalle elezioni di Midterm.
👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi:
https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/prim…
🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran-Usa: l’ora dei falchi
Trump ribalta la richiesta di risarcimenti avanzata da Teheran, chiedendo all’Iran di pagare per decenni di danni causati agli Stati Uniti. La mossa arriva mentre i negoziati sullo Stretto di Hormuz restano in stallo e i falchi guadagnano sempre più peso ai vertici iraniani. Sullo sfondo, il patto di mutua difesa tra Arabia Saudita, Pakistan e Turchia rafforza il fronte regionale volt…
🇮🇱 Bibi e Gaza: il gran rifiuto
Il rifiuto di Benjamin Netanyahu del piano di pace per Gaza promosso dal Board of Peace di Donald Trump arriva mentre il Medio Oriente affronta una nuova fase di tensione. Tra gli attacchi degli Houthi, lo stallo nei negoziati tra Washington e Teheran e la nascita di nuove alleanze regionali, gli equilibri di sicurezza della regione continuano a cambiare.
👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di og…
Trump torna all’attacco dello ius soli
👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/trump-torna-allattacco-dello-ius-soli-243232
🎙️ America First: la fine dell'ordine mondiale? Guarda la nuova puntata di Globally: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvOZpw2EX64
📖 Dopo Ceuta: quale futuro per le relazioni tra Maghreb ed Europa? Leggi l’ultima newsletter Med This Week: https://www.ispionlin…
🔴 Houthi: la minaccia che unisce?
Con l’intensificazione delle tensioni al confine tra Arabia Saudita e Yemen, ieri teatro di attacchi lanciati dal gruppo degli Houthi, oggi Riad prende precauzioni firmando un patto di difesa con Ankara e Islamabad. L’intesa, arrivata dopo settimane di pericolose escalation per mano dei ribelli yemeniti alleati iraniani nella regione, ambisce a fornire ai firmatari garanzie di inter…
🇺🇸 USA, progressisti in corsa per il Congresso
La campagna per le elezioni di metà mandato negli USA è entrata nel vivo. Ieri El-Sayed, figlio di immigrati egiziani, ha vinto le primarie democratiche in Michigan, e sfiderà il repubblicano Rogers per un seggio al Senato. Così, in uno degli “swing states” più importanti del paese, come dimostrato anche nelle candidature alla Camera, si fa strada l’ala progressista che…
La Spagna ritrova la solidarietà europea
👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/la-spagna-ritrova-la-solidarieta-europea-243148
⛴ USA-Iran: luce in fondo a Hormuz?
Si riaccende la speranza di un accordo per riaprire Hormuz al traffico. È quanto emerge dalle dichiarazioni di vertici sia iraniani che statunitensi: lo stesso presidente USA ieri ha affermato che le negoziazioni con l’Iran stanno procedendo, e che un’intesa sulla riapertura della Stretto, seppure temporanea, potrebbe essere vicina. Gli sforzi diplomatici dei paesi del Golfo sembr…
Droni: la Russia si scopre vulnerabile?
👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/droni-la-russia-si-scopre-vulnerabile-243086
🎙️ L'Ucraina ha un nuovo problema. Guarda l'ultima puntata di Globally: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eBjBoLPxJs
❤12👍8🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ispionline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,394,936 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ISPI - Geopolitica” (@ispionline), 27,766 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ispionline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
