Channel
@geo_scope
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Declared links · Cite this entry
2,090subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001822263809 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geo_scope |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geo_scope |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 2,090 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 2,091 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 2,094 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 2,094 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,437 |
| Reactions total | 203 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
203 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💊 | 39 | 19.2% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 15.3% | |
| 🤬 | 23 | 11.3% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 10.8% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 9.85% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 8.87% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 8.87% | |
| 😡 | 10 | 4.93% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 2.46% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.97% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 1.97% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 1.97% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.985% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.493% | |
| 🎅 | 1 | 0.493% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.493% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇹🇷🇸🇦🇵🇰 Un accordo sulla difesa tra #Turchia, #Arabia #Saudita e #Pakistan è stato firmato a #Gedda dal presidente turco, #Recep #Tayyip #Erdogan, il principe ereditario saudita, #Mohammed #bin #Salman, e il premier pachistano, #Shabbaz #Sharif. Lo riporta la tv di Stato turca Trt. L'intesa mira a rafforzare la cooperazione militare e strategica tra le tre nazioni, nel contesto delle tensioni e delle turbolenze regio…
❤2👎1
🇺🇸🇮🇷 #Donald #Trump ha dichiarato che i negoziati sulla riapertura dello Stretto di #Hormuz con l’#Iran sono in corso e che un annuncio potrebbe arrivare presto. Parlando dallo Studio Ovale, il presidente ha aggiunto: «Noi controlliamo lo stretto», riferendosi al ruolo degli Stati Uniti nella sicurezza dell’area. GeoScope | Chat
💊9❤1
🇺🇸🇺🇦 #Donald #Trump ha affermato che gli #Stati #Uniti hanno bisogno dei propri missili #Patriot, ma ha anche espresso preoccupazione per il crescente costo umano della guerra in #Ucraina. Il presidente ha ribadito che Washington vuole porre fine al conflitto, nonostante l’intensificarsi degli attacchi russi. Rispondendo alle dichiarazioni di Zelensky sul «disperato bisogno» di sistemi Patriot, Trump ha detto che a…
👍2💊1
🇷🇺🇪🇺🇺🇸 Nuovi rapporti d’intelligence #USA ipotizzano che #Vladimir #Putin potrebbe testare la determinazione della #NATO nei prossimi anni con un attacco limitato contro un Paese alleato, variando da un’operazione informatica a una piccola incursione terrestre. Secondo il Wall Street Journal, in passato questo scenario era considerato improbabile, ma le valutazioni sono cambiate mentre gli Stati Uniti affrontano car…
👍5🥱1
🇷🇺🇺🇦 Le autorità ucraine hanno ordinato l’evacuazione forzata di centinaia di famiglie con bambini da #Kramatorsk, nell’est del Paese, a causa dell’intensificarsi degli attacchi russi e dell’avanzata delle truppe di Mosca nelle vicinanze. Il governatore della regione di Donetsk, Vadym Filashkin, ha definito la decisione «difficile ma necessaria», spiegando che la situazione della sicurezza sta peggiorando e che è «i…
😢7🤬2
🇺🇸🇺🇦 Secondo il Financial Times, citando fonti informate sui colloqui, nell’incontro alla Casa Bianca della settimana scorsa #Donald #Trump avrebbe respinto la richiesta di #Zelensky di fornire centinaia di nuovi missili intercettori #Patriot. Le fonti spiegano che il presidente americano ha motivato il rifiuto sostenendo che i Patriot sono necessari agli Stati Uniti per difendere i propri interessi in Medio Oriente…
🤬14
🇰🇵🇷🇺🇺🇦 Un’unità missilistica nordcoreana è stata dispiegata nella #Russia occidentale e potrebbe essere equipaggiata con circa 120 missili balistici e 6 lanciatori, destinati a colpire obiettivi in #Ucraina. Lo riferisce un funzionario dell’intelligence militare ucraina, citato da Reuters. L’Ucraina soffre una grave carenza di sistemi avanzati di difesa aerea, e la Russia sta cercando di sfruttare questa vulnerabili…
😡10🤬4
🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦 #Volodymyr #Zelensky ha dichiarato che l’#Ucraina è pronta a qualsiasi formato di negoziato e che la collaborazione con i partner internazionali è attiva. Secondo quanto riportato da Ukrainska Pravda, il presidente ha spiegato che Kiev è in contatto quotidiano con i rappresentanti del presidente Trump e che l’incontro a Washington è servito a discutere come creare condizioni favorevoli a una vera diplomazia. …
❤7👍4🤬1
🇮🇹🇺🇦 #Giuseppe #Conte ha ribadito che il #M5s non voterà il sostegno militare all’#Ucraina, mentre resta favorevole ad aiuti e sanzioni economiche. Conte ha sostenuto che Kiev dispone già di un arsenale molto avanzato e ha espresso dubbi sulla destinazione finale delle armi fornite. Ha aggiunto che il nodo della politica estera sarà deciso con le primarie. Se dovesse vincerle, si impegnerebbe in Europa per una soluz…
👎18💊14🌚1
🇺🇸🇮🇷 #Donald #Trump ha dichiarato di aver accettato di ritirare l’attacco contro l’#Iran su richiesta di #Teheran e di altri Paesi mediorientali, a condizione che si raggiunga rapidamente un accordo sulla totale apertura dello Stretto di #Hormuz e sulla fine della minaccia nucleare iraniana. ~ ANSA GeoScope | Chat
😁5🥱2
🇵🇪 7 italiani risultano tra le vittime dello schianto di un piccolo aereo turistico precipitato nel sud del #Perù. Lo riferisce La Vanguardia, citando media locali. Il velivolo, decollato da Pisco e diretto a Nazca, ha perso i contatti pochi minuti dopo il decollo, come riportato da TV Perú. Le vittime sarebbero tredici: 11 turisti e 2 piloti. Oltre agli italiani, sono morti anche 2 spagnoli e 2 tedeschi. L’ambascia…
😢11
🇮🇷🇺🇸 L’#Iran ha accusato gli #Stati #Uniti di prepararsi a scatenare un conflitto regionale totale, avvertendo che i Paesi che «faranno da scudo» a Washington «bruceranno nelle fiamme della guerra». Ali Abdollahi, capo del Comando centrale delle Forze armate iraniane, ha dichiarato che gli USA «si stanno rapidamente muovendo verso una guerra regionale totale», definendola una strategia pericolosa mirata ad espandere…
👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @geo_scope. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 960,120 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GeoScope” (@geo_scope), 2,090 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geo_scope.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.