Channel
@estero24hnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,152subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001268316239 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @estero24hnews |
| Created | 12 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/estero24hnews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 25,152 | +5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 25,147 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 25,138 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 25,136 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 25,141 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 25,142 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 25,149 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 25,151 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 25,153 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 25,158 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 25,158 | first reading |
222 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 222 (5 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 504,524 |
| Reactions total | 11,733 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,027 reactions across 205 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 1,985 | 18.0% | |
| ❤ | 1,601 | 14.5% | |
| 💩 | 1,367 | 12.4% | |
| 🤣 | 1,215 | 11.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1,097 | 9.95% | |
| 👍 | 770 | 6.98% | |
| 👏 | 519 | 4.71% | |
| 🎉 | 304 | 2.76% | |
| 😢 | 276 | 2.50% | |
| 🤬 | 242 | 2.19% | |
| 👀 | 193 | 1.75% | |
| 😁 | 175 | 1.59% | |
| 😱 | 164 | 1.49% | |
| 👎 | 162 | 1.47% | |
| 🤔 | 138 | 1.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 122 | 1.11% | |
| 🖕 | 111 | 1.01% | |
| 😍 | 98 | 0.889% | |
| 😨 | 82 | 0.744% | |
| 🤩 | 72 | 0.653% | |
| 10 further kinds | 334 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 222 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,733reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇦 #NEW Attacchi missilistici russi contro un'azienda di stoccaggio di cereali di Ukrlandfarming nella regione di Sumy. L'azienda ha interrotto completamente le sue attività. Si segnala che sono state distrutte notevoli quantità di grano, e che sono state danneggiate le aree di produzione e le attrezzature. 👉 Unisciti a @estero24hnews
🤬15🎉4❤1😈1
🇺🇦 #NEW In Crimea, le forze armate ucraine hanno colpito le postazioni del complesso missilistico costiero Bastion, che lancia i missili Oniks e Tsirkon. 👉 Unisciti a @estero24hnews
❤42👎3💩3👍1🔥1🤨1
🇺🇸 #NEW Sky News ha rilevato che oltre 1.300 utenti Strava hanno condiviso dati di allenamento da basi militari statunitensi in tutto il Medio Oriente, rivelando percorsi, routine, movimenti di truppe e persino attività in basi non indicate sulle mappe pubbliche. Molti utenti hanno postato con i loro veri nomi, rendendo potenzialmente identificabili i singoli membri del personale. Gli esperti di sicurezza affermano …
🤣44🗿5🤡4❤2
📰 #NEW La maggior parte degli elettori statunitensi afferma che la propria situazione è peggiorata sotto Donald Trump, secondo un sondaggio del Financial Times, che rivela un crescente malcontento per la gestione dell'economia e del costo della vita da parte del presidente. Con meno di tre mesi dalle elezioni di midterm di novembre, il sondaggio nazionale condotto da Focaldata ha rilevato che oltre il 53 per cento d…
🔥27🤣6❤5👍4🎉2🤡1
🇧🇪 #NEW Ordine di evacuazione per centinaia di persone nel parco degli High Fens, Belgio orientale, a seguito dello scoppio di numerosi incendi boschivi. Descritto dalle autorità come il più grande nella storia moderna del Belgio, l'incendio è scoppiato in un'area di fragili torbiere e foreste di pini devastata da enormi incendi nel 1911. Entro la tarda fine di sabato, aveva bruciato più di 2.700 ettari, rispetto a …
😢22❤2👍2💩1😱1
🇷🇴 #NEW Un pilota spagnolo di caccia F-18 in missione di polizia aerea della NATO ha abbattuto un drone che violava illegalmente lo spazio aereo nazionale rumeno, il quarto aereo senza pilota abbattuto dal paese quest'anno, ha dichiarato il ministero della difesa rumeno. Il ministero non ha specificato l'origine del drone, affermando che i suoi radar lo hanno rilevato entrare nel paese dalla vicina Moldavia, circa 2…
👍16🤡4😁2
🇭🇷 #NEW Il Ministero della Difesa della Croazia ha rilasciato le immagini aeree degli incendi boschivi che negli ultimi giorni stanno colpendo la Dalmazia. L'area più critica quella di Omiš – Lokva Rogoznica, con il dispiegamento di 4 canadair e 3 Air Tractor AT-802. Sulle colline di Omiš, costa Sud di Spalato, gli incendi hanno causato la morte di una 34enne e il ferimento di altre 40 persone, oltre a danni ad edif…
😢28🔥1🤡1🤩1
🇾🇪 #NEW Nuovi attacchi missilistici degli Houthi dalla serata di ieri contro la città yemenita di Marib e contro la città portuale yemenita di Al-Mukha, nel Mar Rosso. Gli Houthi riferiscono di aver colpito truppe e infrastrutture gestite dalle Forze armate saudite e yemenite. 👉 Unisciti a @estero24hnews
❤8👎7🔥4🤡3👍1
🇮🇱 #NEW Nuovi attacchi israeliani nella notte contro l'area di Jabal al-Tahr, Libano meridionale. 👉 Unisciti a @estero24hnews
💩34👍6👏4❤2
🇮🇱 #NEW Israele ha lanciato una nuova iniziativa per influenzare l'opinione pubblica negli Stati Uniti, agendo su come i modelli linguistici di grandi dimensioni lo descrivono in risposta alle query dei chatbot. A riportarlo è POLITICO, secondo cui la campagna di influenza straniera include un finto think tank creato per fornire contenuti a strumenti come ChatGPT. All'inizio di questa settimana, la società di PR fra…
🤡45💩26👍6🐳1🤬1
🇱🇾 #NEW Nella notte segnalati nuovi attacchi con droni contro la città libica di Al-Zawiya. Gli autori sono ancora ignoti. Colpita una sottostazione elettrica a Ben Yusuf. A seguito dell'attacco si è verificato un blackout in numerose zone di Al-Zawiya. 👉 Unisciti a @estero24hnews
🤨13🔥3🤔2🤬1
🇺🇦 #NEW Nella giornata di ieri i canali russi hanno riportato nuovi attacchi con droni Geran e Gerbera contro navi ucraine nell'area del delta del fiume Dnepr. 👉 Unisciti a @estero24hnews
🤬28🎉14🖕4🤡3❤2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @estero24hnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@estero24hnews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 41,754 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Estero 24H 🌍 – Notizie dal Mondo 🗞” (@estero24hnews), 25,152 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/estero24hnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.