Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Facta.news

Channel

Facta.news

@factanewsofficial

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,591subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653844102
TypeChannel
Username@factanewsofficial
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/factanewsofficial

Growth

1,5831,5971,5907 August 2026 — 1,587 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,587 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,585 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,583 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,587 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,590 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,594 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,597 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,591 subscribers1,5917 August 20268 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 32 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,581–1,599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:011,591-6
2 Sept 2026, 22:061,597+4
30 Aug 2026, 15:471,593-1
27 Aug 2026, 10:281,594+4
24 Aug 2026, 03:471,590+3
20 Aug 2026, 22:111,587+4
15 Aug 2026, 04:131,583-2
11 Aug 2026, 12:221,585-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:171,587no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:581,587first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣3333.0%
🤬2929.0%
👍2626.0%
👎44.00%
🔥44.00%
🤷22.00%
😱11.00%
🤯11.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC222 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Da ennesimo fenomeno social, si è presto trasformato nel riflesso di insicurezze che riguardano identità, aspettative e ruolo degli uomini nella società https://www.facta.news/articoli/looksmaxxing-pseudoscienza-manosfera

🤬2🔥1🤣1

7 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC254 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Questo video del presidente Trump che sviene prima di salire in auto è falso. È stato generato con l'intelligenza artificiale https://www.facta.news/antibufale/video-donald-trump-sviene

🤷2👍1👎1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC278 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Su TikTok video di content creator con milioni di visualizzazioni mostrano come utilizzare l'applicazione per individuare l'identità di sconosciuti https://www.facta.news/articoli/sherlock-riconoscimento-facciale-sorveglianza-di-massa

🤬2🤯1😱1

6 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC314 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

No, questi non sono migranti a Ceuta. È un video registrato in realtà in Turchia e mostra una commemorazione religiosa https://www.facta.news/antibufale/migranti-a-ceuta

🤬4

6 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC314 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Questo discorso di Putin in cui spiega perché non attaccherà la Germania è falso. È una notizia inventata, che circola online in diverse lingue almeno dal 2025 https://www.facta.news/antibufale/discorso-putin-perche-non-attacca-germania

🤣4

6 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC336 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Per meno di 24 ore Google ha lanciato la funzione IA sulle sue mappe satellitari di Earth, tra le critiche di esperti e giornalisti per i rischi legati alla disinformazione https://www.facta.news/articoli/ia-google-earth-vita-breve

🤣4

5 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC354 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Questo video non mostra operatori ecologici che puliscono le strade di Ceuta dopo l’arrivo di migranti. La scena è stata filmata invece a Pamplona dopo la festa di San Firmino https://www.facta.news/antibufale/operatori-ecologici-puliscono-ceuta-migranti

🤣4

5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC359 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Questa foto di Zelensky protetto da un vetro antiproiettile durante una conferenza stampa a Kiev è falsa. È stata generata con l’intelligenza artificiale e diffusa dalla propaganda russa https://www.facta.news/antibufale/foto-zelensky-protetto-da-un-vetro-antiproiettile

🤣4

5 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC358 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Alcuni utenti hanno persino paragonato la vicenda a quanto raccontato in alcuni romanzi distopici. Ma quanto c’è di vero e da dove arriva questa notizia? https://www.facta.news/articoli/libri-distrutti-dalle-aziende-chatbot-ia

👎3👍1

4 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC373 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Il video di un agente di frontiera marocchino che lascia passare persone migranti a Ceuta non è del 2026. È una scena successa a maggio 2021 https://www.facta.news/antibufale/agente-frontiera-marocchino-lascia-passare-migranti-ceuta

🤬4

4 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC394 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Questi non sono migranti che a Ceuta compiono atti vandalici. L’episodio mostrato nella clip è accaduto in realtà a Tolosa a maggio 2026, quando i tifosi del PSG hanno festeggiato la vittoria della Champions League https://www.facta.news/antibufale/migranti-ceuta-atti-vandalici

🤬2🤣1

4 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC393 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Le atlete generate con l’intelligenza artificiale sono diventate virali, tra ritorno economico e sessualizzazione dei corpi https://www.facta.news/articoli/atlete-sessualizzate-ia

🤬3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @factanewsofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Will Media
@will_media · 41,430
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
il Post
@ilpost_official · 47,424
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
Suggerimenti di Telegram
@TelegramTipsIT · 183,992
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Facta.news” (@factanewsofficial), 1,591 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factanewsofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.