Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for "Ciao, Internet!" » Matteo Flora

Channel

"Ciao, Internet!" » Matteo Flora

@matteoflora

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,665subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001070495851
TypeChannel
Username@matteoflora
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/matteoflora

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,6645,6805,6726 August 2026 — 5,667 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,666 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,667 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,664 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,668 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,672 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,670 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,677 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,680 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,671 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,664 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,665 subscribers5,6656 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,662–5,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 06:185,665+1
11 Sept 2026, 20:225,664-7
7 Sept 2026, 07:585,671-9
2 Sept 2026, 16:395,680+3
30 Aug 2026, 14:055,677+7
24 Aug 2026, 13:115,670-2
20 Aug 2026, 22:445,672+4
17 Aug 2026, 17:155,668+4
14 Aug 2026, 10:365,664-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:515,667+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:595,666-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:025,667first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 44s
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9259.4%
👍2717.4%
😱117.10%
🔥85.16%
🤮53.23%
⚡42.58%
👾31.94%
😍31.94%
👏21.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈1,260 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Una turista americana ha rischiato la vita seguendo un sentiero "facile" indicato da una guida di viaggio. Peccato che a scriverla non fosse mai stato su quel sentiero. Anzi, non fosse proprio mai esistito. 🤖 Su Amazon ci sono migliaia di guide di viaggio scritte dall'IA e firmate da autori che non esistono: biografie inventate, foto generate, testi plausibili ma pieni di errori con orari sbagliati, ristoranti chius…

🔥5❤4👍2

9 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC898 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Reward hacking: perché gli agenti IA barano sempre di più (e i migliori sono i peggiori) Falsa identità, malware, ricatti, database svuotati: sono i casi reali emersi nei test di sicurezza di Anthropic e OpenAI negli ultimi mesi. Ne ho parlato con Paolo Dimalio sul Fatto Quotidiano, spiegando perché il "barare" degli agenti non è un bug di un vendor, ma la legge di Goodhart applicata all'AI. Più un modello è capace…

👍1

8 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,060 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Sedici virus che non esistevano.🦠 Non ritocchi, non varianti, non copie: sedici genomi interi scritti dall'inizio alla fine da un'intelligenza artificiale che di virus veri non ne aveva mai visto uno, perché i virus umani erano stati tenuti fuori dai suoi dati di addestramento, apposta.Il modello si chiama Evo, sviluppato dal team di Brian Hie fra Stanford e l'Arc Institute: da oltre 300 genomi proposti, 16 hanno co…

😱10❤5👾3

7 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,160 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🦤 Una foto di un uccello rarissimo finisce in un gruppo di birdwatching, raccoglie un sacco di stelline, e da lì rischia di scivolare dentro archivi come iNaturalist o la Macaulay Library del Cornell Lab of Ornithology, i database che i ricercatori usano in tutto il mondo per capire dove vivono davvero le specie. 🤖 Peccato che quell'uccello non esista: è generato con l'intelligenza artificiale. Tra queste immagini …

👍7❤2

5 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,310 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🖥 Collegate un monitor LG UltraGear di fascia alta al PC, e Windows, senza chiedervi nulla, scarica da solo un programma chiamato LG Monitor App Installer, la pipeline pensata per riconoscere l'hardware e distribuire driver e utility in automatico. Il problema arriva un attimo dopo, quando quell'app si piazza tra i programmi che partono all'avvio e vi spara in faccia una promozione di McAfee, prova gratuita di 30 gi…

👍4❤3

3 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC≈1,390 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤖 Il vostro robot aspirapolvere è appena diventato, tecnicamente, una questione di sicurezza nazionale. Dal 28 luglio 2026 negli USA basta poco, circa 2 kg, un sensore, connettività e machine learning, per finire nella "covered list" della FCC, con stop a importazione, marketing e vendita di nuovi modelli. Dentro rientrano umanoidi e quadrupedi già visti nei video virali, ma anche il vostro Roomba, perché quello ch…

❤5⚡4

1 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,550 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Era la notte tra il 15 e il 16 luglio 1942. A Parigi 4.500 agenti bussano a 13.152 porte e sanno già a quale piano, chi trovare e dove. Non fu una caccia: fu una ricerca su uno schedario compilato due anni prima da un burocrate meticoloso e senza nessuna cattiva intenzione. Lo ricordiamo con il nome poetico di “Vent printanier”, poetico come solo un rastrellamento… Ottant'anni dopo, un decreto attuativo in agosto ce…

👍7😍3🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,560 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Instagram crea dipendenza. Lo dice Bruxelles: secondo le conclusioni preliminari della Commissione Europea, Facebook e Instagram sono progettati per questo. Scorrimento infinito, autoplay, notifiche, algoritmi su misura, tutti meccanismi pensati per tenervi in "pilota automatico", con effetti più forti su minori e persone vulnerabili. La multa (fino al 6% del fatturato globale) è solo un dettaglio, ma il punto vero …

❤2

29 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC≈1,520 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

A Codice, su Rai1, ho raccontato a Barbara Carfagna come vivo il rapporto tra la mia neurodivergenza e l'intelligenza artificiale. Per chi ragiona in modo lineare come me, parlare con una macchina è più semplice che parlare con una persona. Non ci sono sottotesti da cercare, doppi sensi, cose non dette. Resta solo il contenuto. Per questo non la considero un vezzo, ma una vera e propria "protesi cognitiva". Ho parl…

❤8👍1

27 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC≈1,650 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Un sedicenne apre TikTok e si ritrova con un profilo visibile a chiunque nel mondo, non solo agli utenti della piattaforma ma anche da browser. E i suoi video possono finire automaticamente raccomandati a perfetti sconosciuti nei "Per Te". Per questo il 24 luglio la Commissione Europea ha inviato a TikTok le conclusioni preliminari di un'istruttoria DSA sui minori, l'ultimo passo prima di una sanzione fino al 6% de…

👍3😱1

25 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,580 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Oggi mi trovate su la Repubblica nell'articolo di Giuditta Mosca dedicato all'accusa formale che la Commissione europea ha mosso a TikTok per violazione del Digital Services Act sulla protezione dei minori. Il nodo vero sta nella fascia 16-17 anni. L'account nasce privato, ma il ragazzo può disattivare quella protezione e renderlo pubblico. Da quel momento i suoi contenuti finiscono nel Feed globale, visibili a chiu…

🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,390 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

La storia dell'AI che complotta la raccontano quelli che vendono AI: fa paura, fa policy, alza le barriere all'ingresso. Funziona. La storia vera è più noiosa e DEVE spaventarvi molto di più. Deve terrorizzarvi proprio. Perché i modelli non si ribellano, ma prendono scorciatoie. E gli stiamo dando le credenziali di casa nostra e delle nostre aziende. Oggi è Sabato, ed è tempo di Editoriale. 👉 https://mgpf.it/2026…

❤5👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @matteoflora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

andreagaleazzi.com
@andreagaleazzi · 22,280
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 September 2026
DeepWeb
@DeepWebITA · 56,555
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 23 August 2026
Suggerimenti di Telegram
@TelegramTipsIT · 183,609
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
il Post
@ilpost_official · 47,452
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
Will Media
@will_media · 41,254
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
ISPI - Geopolitica
@ispionline · 27,723
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Ugolize
@Ugolize · 21,450
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“"Ciao, Internet!" » Matteo Flora” (@matteoflora), 5,665 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matteoflora.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.