админы оказались умнее меня 🫡
🤔24🥴6

Channel
@insuline_eth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,140subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001383330067 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @insuline_eth |
| Created | 5 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/insuline_eth |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 8,140 | +48 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 8,092 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 8,101 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 8,102 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (23 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,640 |
| Reactions total | 418 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
740 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 295 | 39.9% | |
| 👍 | 210 | 28.4% | |
| 🥴 | 132 | 17.8% | |
| 🤔 | 52 | 7.03% | |
| 😱 | 51 | 6.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 740reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @insuline_eth. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
админы оказались умнее меня 🫡
🤔24🥴6
К примеру, для live сканера делать REST поллинг с 5-секундным интервалом вместо WS 😀
🐳29🥴18👍8🤔1😱1
Чуваки, кто сидит на клоде или кодексе или kimi code, просто попробуйте grok build с кастомными моделями через CLIProxyAPI это не то что небо и земля это космос и земля это нахуй млечный путь и земля это нахуй созвездие водолея и земля
🥴36👍14🤔4🐳1
GM! Я больше не вайбкодер, я теперь сантехник епта 😏 В твиттере увидел, что оказывается можно не страдать 10 дней лета и поставить себе домой проточный водонагреватель во время отключения горячей воды (не спрашивайте, почему у меня такая лента). Купил. Внутри коробки — классическая инструкция китайской техники с фразами "他 долбоеб мой 们 друг" и инструкция вообще от водоочистителя. Скинул в ChatGPT фотки всего, что…
🐳47👍22😱6
При IRL общении несколько раз ловил себя на мысли, что не могу обьяснить, что такое аква простым языком, explain me like i'm 5. Наконец-то понял. LP всегда работал как изолированная маржа, а теперь добавился вариант кросс-маржи. Думаю с perp dex механизмами уже знакомы многие, так что становится проще. Думаю стало понятнее, 1инч задумайтесь
🥴18👍4🤔1
гм! Про хак Coldcard на $70M вы уже наверняка читали: плохой RNG в прошивке, всё пространство сидов — максимум 2³² вариантов, хакеры перебрали ключи и вывели биткоин за 14 минут (разбор block, если пропустили). Интереснее то, что случилось после. Твиттерянин Medusa натравил Claude Code на исходники прошивки — один промпт, 8 минут размышлений и уязвимость найдена. В реплаях сразу пришли скептики: модель просто видела…
🐳16😱7
GM! Вот это стрик у меня, 2 подряд поста сразу после написания становятся не актуальными. 1inch Aqua открылась для LP. Про Aqua я писал ещё в ноябре, когда это был shared liquidity layer для солверов и маркетмейкеров, и уже тогда это выглядело как тот кусок паззла, которого DeFi не хватало. Теперь слой открыли для обычных кошельков, и идея докатилась до конечного LP в полном виде: токены не покидают твой кошелёк. Пр…
👍8🐳4🤔4🥴1
gm! Поговорим о том, как Codex становится хуже, и этого никто не замечает В моем сетапе долгое время не было кодекса и начиная с января я подключил его «мидлом». Claude — главный мозг, планирует и декомпозирует, общаюсь с ним, а он уже запрягает Codex за $100 в месяц, который пишет код по готовому спеку и ревьюит то, что Клод написал сам. Комбинация неплохая, все больше и больше приходит к консенсусу в зарубежном A…
👍38🐳4
GM! Свежий раунд humans vs machines, на этот раз в DeFi. Dune и 1inch полгода снимали еженедельные снапшоты концентрированной ликвидности на Uniswap, Pancake и Aerodrome в семи сетях и выкатили ресерч: в среднем 29.5% капитала в CL-пулах не работает. Механика такая: в концентрированной ликвидности ты сам выбираешь ценовой диапазон, в котором работают твои деньги. Как только цена уходит из диапазона, позиция выключа…
👍15🤔4🐳2🥴2😱1
GM! СДВГ пост, так как давно не выходил на связь. Я вернулся в предикшн маркеты. В конце июня случайно услышал у ребят в cp0x подкасте, что на Outcome идёт компетишн: ликва нормальная, а некоторые арбитражи висят достаточно долго. Значит, маркетмейкеров там пока не хватает. Тут надо сделать отступление. Недавно меня зацепил видос Антонова про ретардмаксинг (у кисы тоже классное ревью). TLDR: AI сегодня собирает ид…
🐳48👍17🤔7
Fun fact, с учетом новых комиссий на рынках Polymarket становится менее выгодным, чем букмекерские платформы.
🐳34🥴15
GM! Polymarket за неделю дважды показал, как он относится к людям, которые на нём билдят. 2 июля они одним днём выкатили новый tick size 0.0025 на все маркеты ЧМ и подали это как заботу о трейдерах. На практике всё, что округляло цены до 0.01 — старые версии SDK, любой живой код поверх CLOB — с этого дня слал невалидные ордера, потому что никакого deprecation-периода и миграционного гайда не было, узнавать приходило…
😱32🐳8👍6🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @insuline_eth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 20,891 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dev.insuline.eth” (@insuline_eth), 8,140 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insuline_eth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.