Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Криптологическая экспедиция

@crypticexpedition

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

381subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001353402368
TypeChannel
Username@crypticexpedition
DescriptionЧат @crex_chat Контакт @dmitryq
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/crypticexpedition

Growth

3817 Aug 2026, 11:58 — 381 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:15 — 381 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:588 Aug 2026, 06:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 380–382 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:15381no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:58381first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
249
Videos
14
Links
104

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3736.6%
🔥3029.7%
1413.9%
😁1312.9%
👏54.95%
💯10.99%
🫡10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC195 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bonzo Lend (@bonzo_finance) hacked for $9M. The attacker deposited 3$ of collateral and walked out with $9M, without forging a single signature RootCuase: Wallet A submitted a price update where the BLS signature field was [0,0]. A zeroed signature. No real committee ever signs a zero. To verify a BLS signature you run a pairing check, roughly e(signature, G) == e(H(message), pubkey). Supra's verifier built that che

👍5

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

23 Jun 2026, 16:39 UTC299 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @web3securityresearchPhoto

Мы возвращаемся в темный лес? MEV-бота заскамили на 15 миллионов долларов Что случилось Вчера, 20го июня, один из самых известных игроков mev поля, Jared пострадал от атаки на его mev-бота, потери составили 15кк$. Джаред объявил 1кк$ баунти за возврат полной суммы + отказ от преследования. Атакован был JaredFromSubway.eth - это один из MEV-ботов Джареда, который специализируется на сендвич атаках. Что случилось поп

6

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

23 Jun 2026, 16:15 UTC229 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @insuline_ethPhoto

NO CRYING IN THE CASINO jaredfromsubway.eth — адрес, который должен быть знаком вам, если вы хоть раз обменивали деньги в Ethereum Mainnet. Это один из самых известных MEV-ботов сети. MEV (maximal extractable value) — это деньги, которые можно вытащить из чужих сделок, просто удачно встроившись до и после них внутри блока. Любимый приём Jared – сэндвич: он видит в мемпуле твою крупную покупку, проскакивает вперёд

🔥10😁2

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

7 Apr 2026, 19:22 UTC514 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что за приколы с usdt на троне? Почему, если не застейкать трона на тысячи долларов, комиссия перевода на чистый кошелек около четырёх долларов? И все продолжают пользоваться Или я не знаю способа уменьшить комиссию? Слишком экосистемой эфира был занят

👏5

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

12 Mar 2026, 21:11 UTC656 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @invmruPhoto

Пару часов назад был любопытный свап 56m$aUSDT в 36000$aEthAave https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9fa9feab3c1989a33424728c23e6de07a40a26a98ff7ff5139f3492ce430801f источник https://x.com/hklst4r/status/2032170722286563791?s=46 Был создан такой дисбаланс, что первый mev бот отправил bribe 26m$ валидатору titan builder и заработал чистыми 9m$, но было так много случаев и подсчет не окончательный. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x453

😁51

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

8 Mar 2026, 14:57 UTC594 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Очередные приколы у кампаунда

🫡1

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

28 Feb 2026, 19:04 UTC587 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @invmru

На таком грустном рынке тестирую другие направления. Одним из них, с некоторой полезностью, оказался эвристический анализ смарт-контрактов. Алгоритм поиска - тема для отдельного поста. Veil - аналог Tornado Cash на ZK-SNARKs. Проверка подписи была реализована некорректно - оказалось возможным забрать чужие депозиты, передав слабую подпись (подробнее тут). Атака на пул "0.1 ETH": basescan Остальные пулы через 10 м

👍8

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

28 Feb 2026, 15:47 UTC382 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Напоминание. В evm (а соответственно yul/assembly/huff) результат деления на ноль – ноль. И остаток от деления на ноль – тоже ноль. Без ошибок https://evmresearch.io/evm-internals/yul+division+by+zero+returns+zero+rather+than+reverting+unlike+solidity+checked+arithmetic

🔥2

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

26 Feb 2026, 18:18 UTC371 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А вот прикольная тулза – https://impersonator.xyz/. Позволяет к любому даппу подключиться через WalletConnect от имени любого адреса. У него есть браузерное расширение ещё, но у меня не сработало. А через WC сработало, всё норм

👍5

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

26 Feb 2026, 18:17 UTC333 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я купил новый ноут, поставил всё с нуля (не люблю переносить автоматически со старого) и теперь боюсь ставить расширение для солидити в vscode из маркета

👍5😁2💯1

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

23 Feb 2026, 10:30 UTC468 viewsread 8 August 2026

С ии нашли. Думаю, скоро новые протоколы станут куда безопаснее

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

23 Feb 2026, 10:29 UTC440 viewsread 8 August 2026

uniswap v4 vulnerability disclosed - link @EthSecurity1

Signed THE MEMOLOGICAL EXPEDITION

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @crypticexpedition. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Криптологическая экспедиция” (@crypticexpedition), 381 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypticexpedition.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.