Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 98 days, net -211. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,839–7,114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 08:46
6,871
-3
8 Nov 2026, 07:50
6,874
-3
4 Nov 2026, 18:07
6,877
-12
2 Nov 2026, 04:49
6,889
-5
30 Oct 2026, 01:48
6,894
-4
27 Oct 2026, 05:37
6,898
-1
24 Oct 2026, 01:57
6,899
-2
18 Oct 2026, 10:05
6,901
-2
15 Oct 2026, 06:38
6,903
-7
11 Oct 2026, 20:19
6,910
-24
5 Oct 2026, 00:21
6,934
-16
25 Sept 2026, 16:37
6,950
-18
17 Sept 2026, 01:20
6,968
-6
13 Sept 2026, 02:59
6,974
-12
9 Sept 2026, 10:35
6,986
-12
4 Sept 2026, 08:35
6,998
-31
31 Aug 2026, 13:34
7,029
-8
28 Aug 2026, 16:37
7,037
-4
25 Aug 2026, 22:24
7,041
-9
22 Aug 2026, 18:55
7,050
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 6,871 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,570
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
29 (16 December 2025 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
3,140
Reactions total
81
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 07:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
37
Videos
3
Links
158
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,067 reactions across 29 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
402
37.7%
👍
295
27.6%
😁
162
15.2%
🔥
96
9.00%
🤯
32
3.00%
😭
25
2.34%
💅
11
1.03%
⚡
8
0.75%
👏
7
0.656%
🐳
5
0.469%
🤣
5
0.469%
🥰
5
0.469%
🤔
4
0.375%
💯
2
0.187%
🕊
2
0.187%
🎉
1
0.094%
👌
1
0.094%
😍
1
0.094%
😱
1
0.094%
🤨
1
0.094%
1 further kind
1
0.094%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
291
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 29 we hold a reading for · 62%
Most on one post
269
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ortomich_main. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 December 2025 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Я скуф и плох в плане инноваций личных процессов
Регулярно вижу как люди вокруг меня чуть чуть улучшают свою жизнь путем настраивания всякой мелочи и пробованием нового, а мне это делать лень, тк я в этом для себя зачастую не вижу смысла и считаю что временнАя стоимость ресерча и обновления привычки (например когда переходишь на новое приложение) выше чем потенциальная экономия
Особенно это показательно выражалось …
Забавно как все больше и больше протоколов становится fee-free, но у них в документациях везде есть чудное слово spread
Смена парадигмы, никак иначе, а мы тут говорим нового ничего не происходит в крипте и нет идеи, а тут вон!
Кризис идей в крипте
Сидел я думал о чем вам написать спустя месяц инактива и понял что не о чем, ничего не происходит, нечего обсасывать...
Если мы попробуем вспомнить что случилось за последние пол года в крипте то придут на ум только самые свежие темы, аля пейпертрейд, да и там инноваций хватило на пол дня, и то хайп скорее эксплойтом вызван был, а не самим проектом, также можно вспомнить нарратив, что все очень…
АИ модели все прогрессируют и прогрессируют, но качественной разницы я при этом не замечаю
Регулярно выходят новые модели, каждая ставит новые рекорды и умнеет не по годам и ты смотришь на это все и думаешь "Вау, круто, вот теперь точно умная моделька все сделает за меня", а в итоге все идет по стандартному папйлайну: выходит умная модель, что по ощущениям такая же умная как и прошлая на выходе, потом она потихоньку…
Подписчики, а кто то понимает почему Астра именно что agi? типо просто все решили что оно agi а до этого все не agi было и как бы вот, верьте? или там есть какая то логика? А то мне мой низкий двухзначный iq не позволяет догнать тут до сути
Если Астра реально Agi, то я астробой в красных ботинках
Значете сколько я сделал себе АИ агентов 3 месяца назад? 6 штук
Знаете сколько из них сейчас работают? 0 штук
Эксперимент оказался говном, в целом ничего неожиданного, я изначально когда их собирал понимал что делались они скорее по причине love of the game, нежели для чего то полезного
В итоге сейчас в тренде инстаграма не миллион аи агентов (ибо как я сказал в абзаце выше зачастую это все бесполезны), а создание …
Время нырять в воду (в акву типо поняли да😁)
Вообщем дошли мои шаловливые ручки до депозита тестовой ликвы в акву, ибо уже хоть сколько ко то все настоялось и теперь самому можно идти все щупать
Для тестов как обычно полез в стейбл пару, потестить апу, как в целом все выглядит и принюхаться к продукту. Провайдинг ликвы выглядит очень знакомо, да и интерейс при выборе ренджа не лагает как у некоторого другого розово…
Подписчики я к вам с просьбой
https://x.com/ortomichDev/status/2087609286880878785
Наконец я морально созрел вести твиттер потому что мне будто бы стало это весело, а не потому что надо. Отныне буду там бугуртить и кидать статьи
Прошу вас кинуть лайк на мой пост по ссылке и подписочку оформить
Всех люблю и буду очень благодарен🧡
Все АИ компании сейчас такие:
- А МОя МоДель вЗломала 30000 сайтов И Никто НиЧего не заметил!!!
- А наШа модель ВыбраЛась из ТестовоГо окРужения, КоТоРое ниКТо Не моГ ВзЛоматЬ!
- А наша Модель ЗаРРабоТала МиЛЛиАрд Денег проДаваЯ оРужеЕ ТаЛибАм и ОбманЫВая пеНсиОнерОв на ДеНьги!!!
Маркеинг 2026, споры как в детском саду
Перпечуализация: часть 2. Как сделать опцион вечным
Подписчики здравствуйте!
Вот и вторая часть перпечуализации подьехала. На этот раз гооврим о НиСшЕВой теме, а именно о бесконечных опционах
В статье разобрано:
- Какие бывают перп опционы
- Как они работают
- Короткий вывод по теме перпечуализации
Две части перпечуализации были написаны в первую очередь ради того тейка, что я написал в выводе статьи, и хоть вывод…
Гад деймн, аква выпустилась!
Совсем недавно рассказывал про шум на тему переиспользования ликвидности и оказывается все было не спроста - 1inch выпустили aqua
Концепт переиспользования интересен и вот он в двух словах:
1) Вы даете апрув на свои токены на их некий "Аква Роутер" контракт, aka выделяете ликвидность, aka делаете депозит без депозита
2) Вы выбираете какие "Аква приложения" имеют доступ к вашей ликвиднос…
😁10❤8👍4👏4🥰4🔥3🤯1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @ortomich_main. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Крипто HeadHunter | WEB 3 Jobs @cryptoheadhunter · 20,850 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ortomich” (@ortomich_main), 6,871 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ortomich_main.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.