10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,314–14,342 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 17:07
14,317
-2
16 Aug 2026, 13:55
14,319
-3
14 Aug 2026, 20:59
14,322
+1
13 Aug 2026, 12:28
14,321
+2
12 Aug 2026, 15:53
14,319
+2
11 Aug 2026, 18:41
14,317
-19
9 Aug 2026, 17:21
14,336
-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:54
14,338
-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:15
14,339
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:09
14,339
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.08%
avg views ÷ 14,317 subscribers
Avg views / post
871
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
29 (25 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
25,247
Reactions total
1,048
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,140
Videos
≈848
Links
≈1,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,048 reactions across 28 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
546
52.1%
🔥
276
26.3%
👍
110
10.5%
❤🔥
44
4.20%
🥰
33
3.15%
😢
9
0.859%
😎
6
0.573%
💯
4
0.382%
🤩
4
0.382%
🎉
3
0.286%
😁
3
0.286%
😍
3
0.286%
✍
2
0.191%
🌭
2
0.191%
👌
2
0.191%
👏
1
0.095%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,048reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как поддержать ребенка до начала учебного года и в школьный период: рекомендации Китайской медицины
Судя по опросу, эта тема для многих из вас очень актуальна.
Как и обещала, сегодня я расскажу, как, используя принципы Китайской медицины поддержать баланс тех Ци у ребенка, которые отвечают за хороший иммунитет и способность обучаться.
1. Режим дня поможет поддержать иммунитет и питать те Ци, которые отвечают за об…
Хотите ли вы рекомендации по подготовке детей к школе, по поддержке детей в школьный период и по тому, на что обратить внимание с точки зрения Китайской медицины?
Да, очень нужно94%
Нет, все знаю6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Когда мы говорим о детях, их здоровье, развитии и способности адаптироваться, особенно важно учитывать не только врождённые факторы, но и то, как мы поддерживаем ребёнка каждый день.
Тем более сейчас у нас с вами близится осень. В Москве и Московской области сегодня ночью было всего +5, и уже чувствуется смена сезона.
А вместе с осенью совсем скоро наступит и школьный период. 1 сентября не за горами, поэтому тема п…
Мои дорогие, спасибо за вашу обратную связь 🙌
Учителя, воспитатели, сотрудники школ, детских садов, дошкольных, школьных и медицинских учреждений, к сожалению, вы подтверждаете эту статистику.
Интересная версия про дедушек-алкоголиков. Никогда об этом не слышала, присмотрюсь.
Согласна с вами на 100%, что с «эмоциями», с точки зрения Китайской медицины Ветрами, необходимо работать. Особенно если это трансгенерацион…
Сначала уходит Энергия, потом появляются симптомы
В одном из последних постов я уже затронула тему Энергии. Сегодня хочу продолжить этот разговор, потому что в Китайской медицине Энергия — это не просто ощущение бодрости, а основа всей жизнедеятельности человека.
От уровня Энергии зависит очень многое: как мы просыпаемся утром, насколько быстро восстанавливаемся после нагрузки, хватает ли сил на работу, семью, обще…
ОТВЕЧАЮ НА ВОПРОС О ПОСТКОВИДЕ
00:00 — Что такое постковидный синдром и почему он связан с хроническим воспалением?
01:11 — Почему ковид может протекать скрыто и как он влияет на самочувствие?
02:05 — Как Китайская медицина объясняет постковид через Жар и Чудесные каналы?
03:18 — Почему для работы с постковидом нужна тонкая и точная диагностика?
04:20 — Почему при постковиде невозможно дать одну универсальную инстру…
Обещала рассказать вам историю из наших поездок в Переславль-Залесский. Про Никитский монастырь.
Во вторую поездку шёл очень сильный дождь. До встречи с продавцами дома — того самого, который мы в итоге не купили — у нас было время.
Мы ничего не видели в Переславле-Залесском. Перебирали, куда поехать. И решили: нас очень привлекает Никитский монастырь. Поехали.
К нему ведут две дороги. Одна просёлочная — едешь из …
Наш кусочек земли.
На первых кадрах за деревьями - Плещеево озеро.
Я до сих пор не понимаю, как случайная поездка в Переславль 26 июня привела к новому этапу жизни.
Прошло 1,5 месяца
Дорогие мои подписчики! ❤️
Хотела дождаться окончания регистрации сделки по земле и поделиться с вами новостью о нашей покупке.
Сегодня прием, и я поняла, по вашим вопросам, вопросам сотрудников, что вы все ждете итого, переживаете и радуетесь вместе с нами.
На сегодня, мы подписали договор, отдали на регистрацию.
Считаем землю своей и строим планы по строительству дома.
У нас есть зима на проект дома, участка.…
🔥49❤14😎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @iglanevidimka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хотите ли вы рекомендации по подготовке детей к школе, по поддержке детей в школьный период и по тому, на что обратить внимание с точки зрения Китайской медицины?
Да, очень нужно94%
Нет, все знаю6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 500,841 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Марина Кострова @marina_kostrova · 85,866 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Акупунктура Иглоукалывание Рефлексотерапия Китайская медицина” (@iglanevidimka), 14,317 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iglanevidimka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.