Tadbirkor, biznes konsultant va tizimlashtirish bo’yicha mutaxassis
Rasmiy sahifalarim:
Instagram: instagram.com/ibrahimgulyamov
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@IbrahimGulyamov
📞71-200-92-92
Admin - @pcg_support
Created
11 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,870. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,308–26,739 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 02:50
26,458
+20
5 Nov 2026, 00:49
26,438
-11
3 Nov 2026, 21:49
26,449
+24
2 Nov 2026, 18:40
26,425
+9
1 Nov 2026, 21:20
26,416
+80
31 Oct 2026, 22:19
26,336
+44
29 Oct 2026, 18:40
26,292
+21
28 Oct 2026, 20:50
26,271
+40
27 Oct 2026, 17:04
26,231
-16
26 Oct 2026, 17:17
26,247
-17
25 Oct 2026, 20:09
26,264
+25
24 Oct 2026, 23:06
26,239
-2
24 Oct 2026, 00:36
26,241
-55
23 Oct 2026, 00:29
26,296
+4
21 Oct 2026, 19:58
26,292
-18
20 Oct 2026, 12:46
26,310
-65
19 Oct 2026, 09:06
26,375
+43
18 Oct 2026, 10:16
26,332
+56
17 Oct 2026, 08:56
26,276
+40
16 Oct 2026, 11:00
26,236
first reading
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 136 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 26,458 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,010
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.469%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
129 (28 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
210,350
Reactions total
965
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 03:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,180
Videos
≈977
Links
≈1,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
54m 30s
Average length
1m 26s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,516 reactions across 127 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,275
36.3%
🔥
941
26.8%
❤
931
26.5%
💯
142
4.04%
🏆
76
2.16%
⚡
56
1.59%
👏
43
1.22%
😍
21
0.597%
🥰
11
0.313%
❤🔥
7
0.199%
👌
4
0.114%
🕊
4
0.114%
🤩
3
0.085%
🎉
2
0.057%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,516 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 129 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ibrahimGulyamov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 129 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (9.52%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Biz bu kunni anchadan beri kutgandik!
Bugun sizlarga anchadan beri rejalashtirib kelayotgan katta yangiligimizni mamnuniyat bilan e’lon qilmoqchimiz!
Tadbirkorlar bir-biridan o‘rganishi, tajriba almashishi, yangi imkoniyatlarni kashf etishi va birgalikda rivojlanishi uchun HALQA biznes klubini tashkil etdik!
🫥 HALQA biznes klubi rasman o‘z faoliyatini boshladi!
Eng qizig‘i, klubimizning ilk uchrashuvi va birinchi…
Daromadingizni yeb bitirayotgan 6 ta odat. Buni zudlik bilan to‘xtating!
Rasmdagi “komment”larni o‘qing: ko‘pchilik videoda o‘zini tanidi. Sizda ham shu odatlardan bir nechtasi bo‘lishi mumkin.
👉 Videoni ko‘ring: https://youtu.be/-qdZYUJPbVk
Kichik bir masala. Javobni darrov o'qimang, avval o'ylab ko'ring.
Ikkinchi jahon urushi. Jangdan qaytgan samolyotlarni ko'zdan kechirishyapti. O'q teshiklari asosan qanotlarda va dum qismida. Dvigatelda esa deyarli teshik yo'q.
Samolyot og'irlashib ketmasligi uchun zirhni faqat bir joyga qo'yish mumkin.
Siz qayerga qo'yardingiz?
Ko'pchilik "qanot va dumga, chunki o'q o'sha yerga ko'p tegyapti" deydi. Mantiqli, to…
8 ta maxsus sovg‘alarni bepul qo‘lga kiritishingiz mumkin.
Perfect Consulting Group kompaniyasining 1️⃣1️⃣ yilligi munosabati bilan;
"Tez Natija 7" dasturiga ro'yxatdan o'tib, 9-noyabrgacha 100% to'lov qilganlarga ushbu sovg'alar mutlaqo bepul taqdim etiladi:
🎁 Biznes nonushta - boshqa tadbirkorlar bilan tanishish va tajriba almashish imkoniyati.
🎁 TOP menejerni o‘qitish - tadbirkor o‘zi bilan birga top menejerini…
Nega xodimlaringiz siz kabi kuyib-pishib ishlamaydi?
Chunki biznes sizniki. Xodim uchun esa bu ish joyi.
Siz ertalabdan kechgacha korxona haqida o’ylaysiz. Xodim esa vazifasi aniq bo’lmasa, faqat aytilganini qiladi. Aytilmaganini kutib turadi.
Natijada har bir ishning ortidan o’zingiz yurasiz. Tekshirasiz, eslatasiz, oxiri o’zingiz qilasiz.
Xodimni kuyib-pishib ishlashga majburlab bo’lmaydi. Lekin unga aniq vazif…
Respublika bo'ylab 6 ta viloyatda dasturimizni yakunladik!
Tadbirkorlarimizni rivojlantirish orqali xalqimizning yashash turmush tarzini yangi bosqichga olib chiqish uchun yana bir qadamni bosib o'tdik.
Ko'p ta'riflashni hojati yo'q. Yuqoridagi videoda bemalol ko'rib olishingiz mumkin.
Biz esa ilm tarqatishdan charchamaymiz va hozirda "Tez Natija 7" dasturimizga qabulni ochganmiz.
@IbrahimGulyamov
To’ti do’konda odamga o’xshab gapirib, xaridorlarni xursand qilar ekan. Baqqol undan juda faxrlanarkan.
Bir kuni baqqol yo’q paytida to’ti cho’chib ketib, peshtaxtadagi yog’ idishlarini to’kib yuboribdi. Baqqol qaytib kelib, jahl ustida to’tining boshiga uribdi. To’tining boshidagi patlari to’kilib, kal bo’lib qolibdi.
O’sha kundan boshlab to’ti bir og’iz ham gapirmay qo’yibdi. Baqqol pushaymon bo’lib, unga don ber…
Bizning oliy maqsadimiz: «Biznes egasini rivojlantirish orqali ularning qo‘li bilan xalqning yashash turmush tarzini yaxshilab, yangi bosqichga olib chiqish»
Bu maqsad ortidan dasturlarimizda 13.000 dan ortiq tadbirkorlar qatnashib, bilim olib, karra karra natijalar qilib kelishmoqda.
Respublika bo'ylab intensiv dasturlarimiz tugab, 5 haftalik "Tez Natija 7" dasturimizga start berdik.
Darslar 12-noyabrdan boshlana…
3 xil mijoz bor (to‘lov qilishda).
1. Ishonchli, vaqtida tovar olib, vaqtida beradi.
2. Ishonchli, lekin tartibsizlik sabab sal kechiktiradi.
3. Ishonchsiz, aldaydi, bahona qiladi.
Bular bilan qanday ishlashni videodan bilib olishingiz mumkin.
“Mijoz bor, sotuv yo’q.”
So’rovnomamizda tadbirkorlar shu gapni eng ko’p yozishgan.
Reklamaga pul to’laysiz, mijoz kelib narxni so’raydi.
Sotuvchi narxni aytadi, mijoz “qimmat ekan” deb chiqib ketadi.
Keyin reklamani ko’paytirasiz.
Lekin muammo reklamada emas, mijoz kelgandan keyingi suhbatda.
Ketib qolgan har bir mijoz reklamaga to’lab, qo’ldan chiqargan pulingiz.
Sotuvchilaringiz uchun “Sotuv menejeri” kursi bo…
Sizga kimdir $20mln shundoq qo‘lingizga, hech narsa qilmasangiz ham berib qo‘ysa, siz boy bo‘lib ketasizmi?
Tadqiqotlar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, 3-5 yilda boylar yana boy, kambag'allar esa yana kambag'allashib qoladi.
Nega?
Sababini videoda tushuntirdim!
Shu bilan birga Pulingiz ko'paymasligidagi to'siqlarni ham bilib olasiz!
Video link:
https://youtu.be/EHyHoz1pmdo?si=Eagoni9DKBJEEfJq
👍10🔥5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @ibrahimGulyamov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ibrahimGulyamov edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @ibrahimGulyamov as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Asror Iskandarov | Shaxsiy Brend Qurish @asroriskandarovshb · 22,878 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
Alisher Isaev blogi @AlisherIsaev_blogi · 42,697 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Саидмурод Давлатов @saidmurod_davlatov_official · 29,752 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ibrahim Gulyamov” (@ibrahimGulyamov), 26,458 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibrahimGulyamov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.