Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hasanov kundaligi 📘

Channel

Hasanov kundaligi 📘

@hasanovblog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,248subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001169863075
TypeChannel
Username@hasanovblog
Created26 November 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hasanovblog

Growth

1,2381,2481,2436 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,238 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,248 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,237–1,250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:121,248+10
12 Aug 2026, 01:571,238-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:361,239no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:581,239first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.2%
avg views ÷ 1,248 subscribers
Avg views / post
440
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held16 (1 July 202625 July 2026)
Views total3,078
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC≈370 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"Portfolioingizni ko‘rib chiqdim... Lekin bu yerda shaxsan o‘zingiz nima ish qilgansiz?" Yaxshi savol va bu tabiiy. Chunki mening ishimni alohida qismlarda — logo, matn yoki videolarda ko‘rinmaydi.​ Men dizayner, kopirayter yoki fotograf emasman.​ Shu sababdan ijrochi mutaxassisni o‘zi bilan ishlay qolaylik, deyishadi baʼzida. Brendingda ikki qism bor:​ 1. Strategiya: "Biz kimmiz va qayerga ketyapmiz?"​ 2. Operatsi

24 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC≈286 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Yana bitta brending agentligi ;) Ochig'i o'zimizni qanday tanishtirish haqida ko'p o'yladik. O'zgacharoq, kreativroq... Lekin vaqt, bozor, mijoz buni kutib turmaydi. Shunga boshlayveramiz. Front — bu jang maydoni! Brendlar o‘rtasidagi, marketing g‘oyalari orasidagi kurashlar maydoni. Barcha bu maydonda mijozni o‘ziniki qilish uchun, o‘z g‘oyasini sotish uchun jang qiladi. Brending janglari ichida, siz bilan, FR

22 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC≈428 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Amaliyot hammasini boshqatdan kashf qiladi! Fizikada oddiy formula bor: S=v×t (Masofa=tezlik×vaqt). Ya'ni nazariy jihatdan 60 km/soat tezlikda yursangiz, 60 km masofani 1 soatda bosib o‘tasiz. Lekin amaliyotda svetoforlar, tirbandliklar va yo'lda kutilmagan ta’mirlash ishlari ketayotgan bo'lishi mumkin. Ajoyib iqtibos bor: "Nazariyada nazariya va amaliyot o‘rtasida hech qanday farq yo‘q. Amaliyotda esa bor." Biz

20 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC≈515 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

LOOOK restyling qildimi? Logo o‘zgaribdi. Nimanidir o‘tkazib yubordik shekilli? 📌 telegram.me/hasanovblog

20 Jul 2026, 03:45 UTC≈479 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Finalning haqiqiy g‘olibi — Adidas! 📌 telegram.me/hasanovblog

19 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC≈518 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Yaqin insonmisiz yoki emotsional "chelak"? Buni qanday bilsa bo'ladi? Ayniqsa, qizlarda ko'p uchraydi bu. ("Chelak" nima ekanini esa, hozir tushunib olasiz) Hamma ham yaqin inson bo'lganingiz uchun sizga dardini aytmaydi. Ba'zan inson shunchaki ichida yig'ilib qolgan negativ emotsialarini chiqarib olishni xohlaydi. Xoh g'iybat xoh boshqacharoq ko'rinishda bo'lsin, sizga dardini to'kib-soladi. Siz unga shunchaki o'

18 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC≈482 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Manu quyosh nima devotti?) Xo'sh, bu issiq darajasini qanday ifodalasak bo'ladi? Metaforalar, memlarni izohlarda qoldiring, kimniki zo'rroq chiqarkan ) 📌 telegram.me/hasanovblog

16 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC≈544 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Baʼzi odamlar dard, baʼzilar tajriba, baʼzi insonlar esa hayotingga baxt olib keladi. Ularning nima berishi — o‘z feʼlidan, ayni senga berishi esa — qilgan amallaring natijasidan. 📌 telegram.me/hasanovblog

15 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈608 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Brend mutaxassislari uchun savol: "Brend — bu logo emas" deb hamma gapira oladi ;) Real keysda sinab ko'ring. Holat: "Gullasin" (o'ylab topilgan) — Toshkentdagi oyoq kiyim ulgurji distributori. O'zida ishlab chiqarish yo'q, Xitoy va mahalliy fabrikalardan olib, tarmoqli do'konlarga sotadi. 100+ SKU, marja modelga qarab 5%-30%, lekin sof foyda atigi ~3%. Muammo: Tarmoq do'konlaridagi ishchi ta'minotchilar o'zlari m

12 Jul 2026, 04:44 UTC≈582 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Manmanlik va hasad o‘rtasida bo‘ling. Manmanlik bu o‘zini boshqalardan ustun deb bilish bo‘lsa, hasad esa aksi, o‘zini boshqadan past sanab, undagi ustunlikka rozi bo‘lmaslik. Qachonki bir odamdagi kamchilikni ko‘rsangiz, o‘zingizni undan ustun ko‘ra boshlaysiz. Qachonki boshqa insondagi ustunlikni ko‘rib, o‘zingizdagi boriga rozi bo‘lmasangiz, hasad qila boshlaysiz. O‘rtasida, muvozanatda bo‘ling! Odamlardan do

11 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC≈549 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Brendingdagi "Social proof" nimaligi haqida sodda tushuntirish. Siz haqiqatdan soha mutaxassisi bo'lib, to'g'ri narsalarni gapirsangiz ham "Ijtimoiy tasdiq" bo'lmasa, odamlar miyasidagi "Buni nimaga eshitishim kerak" degan savoli yechilmaydi. 📌 telegram.me/hasanovblog

9 Jul 2026, 06:09 UTC≈559 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Kunni samarali o‘tkazish uchun 3 ta OLTIN QOIDA! ​Kun bo‘yi esnab, ishga qo‘l bormay yuradiganlar ko‘p. O‘zimda ham shunaqa edi. Energiya darajangizni 2 barobar oshiradigan va kuningizni samarali qiladigan 3 ta oddiy qoida bor: ​1. Uyqugacha: "Raqamli o‘chish". Kun tundan boshlanadi. Yotishdan 1 soat oldin (menda 21:00) telefon va noutbukni butunlay yig‘ishtiring. Ekran ko‘k nuri melatonin gormonini o‘ldiradi va m

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hasanovblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 317,074 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hasanov kundaligi 📘” (@hasanovblog), 1,248 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hasanovblog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.