Channel
@pulatovjurabek
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
589subscribers
+52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002023084941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pulatovjurabek |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pulatovjurabek |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 589 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 588 | +27 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 561 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 557 | +22 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 535 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 537 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 537 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 39 | 51.3% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 21.1% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 10.5% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bilasizmi, odamlarni ko'p sifatlarga ko'ra ikki toifaga ajratish mumkin. Bu sifatlardan biri bu bayramlarda boshqalarni tabriklash. Ayniqsa tug'ilgan kunlarda Balki bu xatodir, milliy qadriyatlarimizga ziddir. lekin menga yoqmaydi. Lekin shundayam bugun mani bayram bilan tabriklaganlarga javob berdim. Hammaga emas albatta. Faqatgina maxsus men uchun yozganlarga yozdim. Men ham ularga o'z qo'lim bilan, tabrigi uc…
👏2🔥1
"Aka, strategiya qilishga vaqtimiz yo'q, tezroq sotuv qilaylik!" Shunaqangi shoshqaloq mijozlar bozordagi marketerchilarni ikkiga ajratadi 1) Birinchi toifadagilar mijozga "xo'p" deydi-da, darhol sotuv kreativ tayyorlab, target yoqadi. 2) Strategik marketologlar esa "Aka shoshmang, hali sizni hech kim tanimaydi, Bularga hozir to'g'ridan-to'g'ri sotib ol desak, qochib ketadi" deydi va 3 bosqichli sotuv voronkasi tu…
🔥4👍2
Arzonchi mijozlar qaytanga qimmatga tushadi Arzon qilib bering deyishadi, siz esa mayli deb narxdan o'tib berasiz. Lekin o'sha mijoz boshqalarga qaraganda ko'proq stress beradi va oxirida negativ olib keladi. Sotuv vaqtida qimmat ekan desa unga maxsus taklif beraman. "Demak sizga xizmatim ma'qul faqat narxini kelishsak shartnoma qilamizmi" deyman. Agar ha desa unga u beradigan puliga yarasha xizmat taklif qilama…
🔥5👍4⚡2
📌 Rahbar uchun biznesining salomatligini tekshirish uchun 8 ta metrika 📝 Inson tanasida Gomeostaz degan qonun bor. Tashqarida havo sovib ketsa tana qaltirab, o‘zini isitadi. Havo isib ketsa terlab, o‘zini sovutadi. Ya’ni, tana "36.6" balansini avtomatik ushlab turadi. Siz buni o‘ylab o‘tirmaysiz, tizim o‘zi ishlaydi. Bu organizmning ichki muhitini. muvozanatini barqaror ushlab turish qobiliyati degani. Endi komp…
🔥3👏1
4 toifa rahbarlar bo'lar ekan 1) Yong'oq - usti qattiq, ichi yumshoq. Badjahl, qurs ko'rinadi lekin ishdan bo'shatish, chora ko'rishga kelganda qo'rqadi 2) Tosh tabiat - stirti ham ichi ham qattiq. Birgina xato uchun oxirini o'ylamasdan ishdan bo'shatadi, qattiq jazolaydi. 3) Shaftoli tabiat - usti yumshoq, yuvosh ko'rinadi lekin bo'shatish yoki chora ko'rish kerak vaqtda o'ylab o'tirmaydi, hissiyotlarga berilmasd…
😁4🔥1🗿1😨1
Arzonga ishlamang. Bu shunchaki pul masalasi emas, bu sizning ruhiyatingiz va professional kelajagingiz bilan bog‘liq joyi bor. Keling sabablarini aytib beraman. Miyaning "tejash" rejimi yoqiladi va siz qanchalik mas’uliyatliman desangiz ham miyangiz qarshilik qiladi. Arzon qiymat uchun bor energiyangizni sarflashni xohlamaydi va sizni "asray" boshlaydi. Natijada esa ishtiyoqiz so‘nadi, va’dalar kechikadi va ish…
🔥4
Saljuqiylar hukmdori Alp Arslondan so‘rashibdi: — Shunday qudratli imperiya nega parchalandi? Javob: — Bunga sabab shuki, biz qo‘lidan ish keladigan odamlarga mayda-chuyda ishlarni berdik. Qo‘lidan ish kelmaydigan pandavaqilarga katta-katta vazifalarni topshirdik. Katta vazifalarni ular eplolmadi. Narigilar ishini pisand qilmadi... @pulatovjurabek
🔥3
Tizimlashmagan biznesning "srok godnosti" qancha? Ko‘pchilik rahbarlar doimiy stress, tinimsiz o‘ylovlar va "pojar" ichida yurishni biznesning tabiiy holati deb qabul qilishadi. Tizimlashmagan biznes faqat rahbarning sog‘lig‘i, asabi va sabri tugaguncha yashaydi. Agar butun boshli tizim faqat rahbarning shaxsiy energiyasiga bog‘lab qo‘yilgan bo‘lsa, u uzoqqa bormaydi energiya tugashi bilan biznes yo yopiladi, yo ki…
🔥3
Biznesingizda yollanma askarlar armiyasini quryapsizmi yoki haqiqiy jamoami? ⚠️ Ko‘p rahbarlar ko‘proq pul berish orqali xodimlarni yaxshiroq ishlashga majburlash mumkin deb xato o‘ylashadi. Aslida esa, noto‘g‘ri belgilangan mukofot tizimi jamoani "yollanma askarlar" armiyasiga aylantirishi yoki mashhur "kobra effekti" kabi kutilmagan salbiy oqibatlarga olib kelishi mumkin. ✅ Ushbu maqolada oylik va bonusning muvo…
🔥3👍1
Xodimlar sizsiz, o'zi bilib ishlamasligining ikkinchi sababi xato qilishdan qo'rqishidir Agar kompaniyada har bir kichik xato uchun jinoyat sifatida choralari ko'rilsa, xodim o'zini himoya qilish rejimiga o'tadi. "Agar hech narsa qilmasam va hamma narsani boshlig'imdan so'rasam, aybdor bo'lmayman" deb hisoblaydi Ba'zi rahbarlar hamma narsa 100% ideal bo'lishi kerak degan talabni qo'yadi. Xodim esa rahbarning "ide…
😁2👏1🔥1
Nima uchun xodimlaringiz sizsiz ishlashni xohlamaydi? 1-sabab bu mikro menejment. ⚠️ Agar siz har bir kichik detalni nazorat qilaversangiz va xodimlaringizning har bir qarorini qayta ko‘rib chiqsangiz ularda "tashabbus ko‘rsatish yoqoladi. Baribir rahbar o‘zi xohlagandek qildiradi, yaxshisi kutaman" degan fikrga kelishadi. ✅ Bu muammoning yechimlari haqida bu yerda o'qing. Keyingi postim shu muammoning ikkinchi s…
👍2🔥2
✍️ Bir yigit ChatGPT'ga mebellar o‘lchami ko‘rsatilgan xona chizmasini yuklab, javon va karavotni qayerga qo‘yish mumkinligini so‘rabdi. Natijani suratda ko’rishingiz mumkin :) 📟 DigiTech
😁3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pulatovjurabek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jo'rabek Pulatov | Biznesni Tizimlashtirish” (@pulatovjurabek), 589 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pulatovjurabek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.