Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ServerAdmin.ru

@srv_admin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

32,486subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001141300177
TypeChannel
Username@srv_admin
DescriptionАвторская информация о системном администрировании. Информация о рекламе: @srv_admin_reklama_bot Автор: @zeroxzed Второй канал: @srv_admin_live Сайт: serveradmin.ru Ресурс включён в перечень Роскомнадзора
Created22 May 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/srv_admin

Growth

32,45732,49732,4776 August 2026 — 32,457 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,472 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,482 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,481 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,482 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,491 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,497 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,486 subscribers32,4866 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,451–32,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:3432,486-11
11 Aug 2026, 20:2232,497+6
10 Aug 2026, 23:0832,491+9
10 Aug 2026, 01:1132,482+1
9 Aug 2026, 03:5332,481-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:3132,482+10
7 Aug 2026, 03:5032,472+15
6 Aug 2026, 04:1532,457first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 32,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,790
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.871%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (27 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total149,330
Reactions total1,300
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,200
Videos
75
Links
3,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 35s
Average length
1m 32s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,096 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍99891.1%
👎988.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,300reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 22 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @srv_admin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC≈3,130 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На днях прочитал любопытную статью на хабре на тему переезда с облачных услуг на свои локальные в офисе: Keycloak, Mailcow, Mattermost, GitLab Self-Managed, Jira, Confluence, Nextcloud, Vaultwarden. ⇨ https://habr.com/ru/articles/1066990/ Так как я большой специалист по настройке и обслуживанию такого рода костылей, то не смог пройти мимо и не прокомментировать, чтобы у вас не было соблазна так же считать затраты и

👍83👎10

11 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈4,540 views95 reactions12 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Расскажу про некоторые системы, которые ранее уже упоминал на канале, но в качестве обзора или начального впечатления. Сейчас я с ними уже поработал на своей инфраструктуре, мне они понравились, я их изучил и оставил в работе, так что могу дать более осмысленное описание. Меня иногда спрашивают, зачем домой покупать сервера, что-то настраивать, на работе этого хватает. Скажу конкретно за себя. Для меня это тоже част

👍94👎1

11 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈4,890 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📣 Как мигрировать 100+ рабочих станций за 20-25 минут на российскую ОС: технический разбор Astra Migration 18 августа в 11:00 вебинар про технологическую часть Astra Migration — инструмента для параллельной миграции с Windows на Astra Linux. В программе: 🔹 Архитектура и технические особенности Astra Migration. 🔹 Как устроен центр миграции и что происходит на рабочих станциях до, во время и после перехода. 🔹 Что дел

👎36👍9

10 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈5,480 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Недавно решил попробовать в качестве агента ИИ из подписки ChatGPT Plus. У меня нет постоянно платного аккаунта там, пользуюсь бесплатным. Не захотел покупать на свой основной, где большая история запросов, хотел просто попробовать. Для этого купил за 600р. аккаунт с общим доступом. Как я понял, его продают нескольким людям и они могут одновременно им пользоваться. Не знаю, как это работает и почему аккаунты не банят

👍64👎2

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈8,060 views33 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Poll

4️⃣ Если дистрибутив на базе Linux российский, то какой именно?

  1. Астра20%
  2. Альт11%
  3. РЕД ОС11%
  4. РОСА1%
  5. МСВСфера0%
  6. Calculate0%
  7. Другой2%
  8. Не использую, посмотреть результаты55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍32👎1

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈7,590 views24 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Poll

3️⃣ Если на серверах у вас ОС на базе Linux, то в основном какой это дистрибутив?

  1. Debian 🖥39%
  2. Ubuntu 🖥36%
  3. Форк RHEL (Rocky, Alma, Oracle и т.д.)9%
  4. Один из российских дистрибутивов8%
  5. Другой2%
  6. Не использую, посмотреть результаты4%

Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍23👎1

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈6,660 views24 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Poll

2️⃣ Под вашим управлением больше всего серверов какой операционной системы?

  1. Windows 💻25%
  2. Linux 🐧69%
  3. *BSD 👹1%
  4. Другая0%
  5. Не администрирую, посмотреть результаты4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍23👎1

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈6,600 views31 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Poll

1️⃣ Какая основная операционная система установлена на вашем рабочем компьютере или ноутбуке?

  1. Windows 💻61%
  2. Linux 🐧25%
  3. MacOS 🍏13%
  4. Другая1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍30👎1

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈6,630 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📊 Раз в год я провожу на своём канале опросы на тему использования операционных систем на серверах и рабочих станциях ИТ специалистов. Даже не заметил, как пролетел очередной год и даже больше. Пришло время повторить опрос и посмотреть на тенденции. В 2024 и 2025 результаты были такие: ◽️ОС на рабочем компьютере и серверах 2025 ◽️ОС на рабочем компьютере и серверах 2024 Когда завершится этот опрос (через 2 недели)

👍19👎1

5 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈8,630 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я себе настроил дома для личных нужд сервер на Xpenology. Прошло уже больше месяца, в настройки лазить перестал, так что можно подвести некоторые итоги и поделиться с вами информацией. Для тех, кто не знает, что такое Xpenology, поясню - это копия операционной системы Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM), которую можно установить только на устройства этой же компании. Проект Xpenology ничего не меняет в оригинальной ОС

👍97👎6

4 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈6,370 views42 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026

🔝 ТОП постов за прошедший месяц июль. Все самые популярные публикации по месяцам можно почитать со соответствующему хэштэгу #топ. Отдельно можно посмотреть ТОП за прошлые года: 2023 и 2024 и 2025. Этим летом пишу мало, подустал уже за столько лет. Работу тоже новую не беру. Занимаюсь больше бытовыми делами. Да и основной мой формат в виде руководств и советов как-будто потерял актуальность. ИИ отлично решает эту зад

👍41👎1

3 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC≈7,020 views72 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

RTX 5090 6GPU Workstation Как вам такая сборочка рабочей станции? Я прикинул, что в доме можно было бы часть радиаторов отключить, если её запускать на полную мощность. Либо сразу встроить в контур отопления. До морозов этого системника хватило бы поддерживать тепло в доме. Шутки-шутками, но моя стойка в доме с несколькими серверами полностью отапливает зимой помещение (6 кв. м.), в котором работает. Радиатор там о

👍71👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @srv_admin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Poll3,200 voters approx.

4️⃣ Если дистрибутив на базе Linux российский, то какой именно?

  1. Астра20%
  2. Альт11%
  3. РЕД ОС11%
  4. РОСА1%
  5. МСВСфера0%
  6. Calculate0%
  7. Другой2%
  8. Не использую, посмотреть результаты55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Poll2,950 voters approx.

3️⃣ Если на серверах у вас ОС на базе Linux, то в основном какой это дистрибутив?

  1. Debian 🖥39%
  2. Ubuntu 🖥36%
  3. Форк RHEL (Rocky, Alma, Oracle и т.д.)9%
  4. Один из российских дистрибутивов8%
  5. Другой2%
  6. Не использую, посмотреть результаты4%

Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Poll2,880 voters approx.

2️⃣ Под вашим управлением больше всего серверов какой операционной системы?

  1. Windows 💻25%
  2. Linux 🐧69%
  3. *BSD 👹1%
  4. Другая0%
  5. Не администрирую, посмотреть результаты4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Poll2,910 voters approx.

1️⃣ Какая основная операционная система установлена на вашем рабочем компьютере или ноутбуке?

  1. Windows 💻61%
  2. Linux 🐧25%
  3. MacOS 🍏13%
  4. Другая1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 478,744 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ServerAdmin.ru” (@srv_admin), 32,486 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/srv_admin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.