Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
121 measurements spanning 96 days, net -48,099. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 410,310–472,839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 121
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 12:50
417,525
-258
10 Nov 2026, 18:21
417,783
-340
9 Nov 2026, 19:58
418,123
-274
9 Nov 2026, 08:47
418,397
-453
8 Nov 2026, 08:06
418,850
-99
7 Nov 2026, 22:31
418,949
-322
7 Nov 2026, 05:49
419,271
-94
6 Nov 2026, 21:57
419,365
-349
6 Nov 2026, 07:49
419,714
-104
5 Nov 2026, 22:51
419,818
-279
5 Nov 2026, 07:58
420,097
-106
4 Nov 2026, 21:39
420,203
-238
4 Nov 2026, 08:25
420,441
-75
4 Nov 2026, 00:00
420,516
-385
3 Nov 2026, 04:50
420,901
-29
2 Nov 2026, 21:29
420,930
-284
2 Nov 2026, 07:46
421,214
-165
1 Nov 2026, 19:29
421,379
-259
1 Nov 2026, 05:26
421,638
-66
31 Oct 2026, 21:50
421,704
first reading
Engagement
1,188 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.738%
avg views ÷ 417,525 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,080
304 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
304
of 1,188 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
1,188 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
937,160
Reactions total
56,439
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈25,200
Videos
≈728
Links
≈1,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 58s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
195,744 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
53,058
27.1%
❤
52,089
26.6%
👍
46,072
23.5%
😈
44,525
22.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195,744 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,149
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
363
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bsignal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 22 of 304 posts held from the last 30 days (7.24%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🟢ICP
🟢1H
⏺⏺⏺⏺✅⏺⏺⏺⏺
⚠️رفقا کوین #ICP بعد از رسیدن به ناحیه مقاومتی به خوبی تونسته ریجکت بشه و وارد فاز اصلاحی بشه📉🔽
🕯اگه اصلاحش ادامه دار بشه و بتونه به نقاط پایینتر برسه ، میتونیم شاهد رسیدن قیمت به ناحیه حمایتی و پرتاب مجدد قیمت باشیم🔍💥📈
🔖پس از روی ناحیه حمایتی با استاپ زیر ناحیه وارد پوزیشن لانگ بشیم🔼⚡️
⏺⏺⏺⏺⏺✅⏺⏺⏺⏺
💎Bsignal | Crypto Analysis & Signals🟠
🪙 خروج سنگین بیتکوین از صرافیها🔥
🕯طبق دادههای CoinGlass، طی 7 روز گذشته حدود 30,000 بیتکوین از صرافیهای متمرکز خارج شده است⚡️
⚠️ ارزش این خروجیها حدود 2.52 میلیارد دلار بوده است👀📊
💎Bsignal | Crypto Analysis & Signals🟠
صبح بخیر🏕⛅️
🏆امروز یه فرصت تازهست برای ساختن چیزهایی که دیروز فقط بهشون فکر میکردی🎬💎
🧠با ذهنی آروم، قلبی امیدوار و انگیزهای بیشتر از دیروز شروع کن⚡️
🪩بهترین اتفاقها گاهی از سادهترین صبحها شروع میشن✨
🟢ONDO
🟢2H
⏺⏺⏺⏺✅⏺⏺⏺⏺
🎮رفقا ارز $ONDO رو در تایم فریم 2 ساعته تحلیل کردم براتون✔️
💡قیمت چندین بار به ناحیه حمایتی که مدنظر داریم واکنش مثبت داده و براش حفظ این محدوده مهمه پس انتظار واکنش مجدد ازش بالاست🙂⚡️📈
🔥از طرف دیگه قیمت ریجکتی خوبی توی آخرین برخوردش به محدوده داشته و میتونه با کمی اصلاح دوباره به اونجا برسه و به سمت نقدینگی بالای سقفی که ساخته و مقاومتی که پیش روی خودش هست حرکت کنه🥸🔼💥
⏺⏺⏺⏺✅⏺⏺⏺⏺
💎Bsignal | C…
🚨رفقا نتیجه Cpi آمریکا اومد | تورم ماهانه کمتر شد، تورم هسته ثابت موند
⬅️ تورم ماهانه اکتبر: ۰٫۴٪ | ماه قبل ۰٫۶٪
⬅️ تورم هسته ماهانه: ۰٫۳٪ | بدون تغییر نسبت به ماه قبل
⬅️ تورم سالانه: منتشر نشد، چون دادههای اکتبر پارسال جمعآوری نشده بود.
رفقا، قیمتها هنوز بالا رفتن، فقط سرعت گرونشدن کمتر شده. رشد ماهانه قیمت انرژی از ۵٫۲٪ به ۰٫۷٪ رسید، ولی تورم هسته که غذا و انرژی رو کنار میذاره، همون ۰٫۳٪ موند
💎Bsignal | Cr…
ℹ️بریم برای جواب سوال دیروزمون 🕯
🔴وارد پوزیشن سل - شورت میشیم🔽
علت ⁉️
🔍بخاطر اینکه توی لگ ریزشی اولی که داریم (داخل چارت قبلی بهش اشاره کردم) قیمت حال حاضر با پامپ پرقدرتی که داشته به بالای 50% لگ و نقطه نقدینگی و اردربلاک تایم 1 ساعته رسیده ، پس وارد پوزیشن سل میشیم🔥🥸📉
💎Bsignal | Crypto Analysis & Signals🟠
💰 جورین تیمر از فیدلیتی:⬇️
#بیتکوین پس از حفظ سطح 60,000 دلار وارد یک بازار صعودی جدید شده است🔍🔼
🕯مدل تحلیلی او نیز قیمت 300,000 دلار برای بیتکوین تا سال 2029 را پیشبینی میکند.🔥
💎Bsignal | Crypto Analysis & Signals🟠
🟢ATOM
🟢4H
⏺⏺⏺⏺✅⏺⏺⏺⏺
🖥رفقا کوین #ATOM رو داریم که بالای ناحیه حمایتی و زیر مقاومت خط روند قرار گرفته🔍🔥
📌سناریو تحلیلی که برای این کوین دارم اینه که قیمت به ناحیه حمایتی مشخصمون برخورد بکنه و مجدد به سمت ناحیه مقاومتی حرکت کنه🕯📈
💥ما نهایت با اهرم 15X وارد پوزیشن از جفت نقاط مشخص میشیم✔️
⏺⏺⏺⏺✅⏺⏺⏺⏺
💎Bsignal | Crypto Analysis & Signals🟠
صبح بخیر رفقا ، روزتون پر از اتفاقهای خوب!🌈💝
امروز رو با ذهنی آروم، انگیزهای تازه و امید به فرصتهای جدید شروع کنید✨🌱
یادتون باشه هر روز میتونه نقطه شروع یک اتفاق بزرگ باشه؛ فقط کافیه با آگاهی و قدمهای درست پیش برید🙂⚡️
پرقدرت شروع کنید، هوشمندانه ادامه بدید و به بهترینها فکر کنید 💚💵
🔥67😈49👍38❤37
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,188 posts we hold for @bsignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bsignal edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 October 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
با توجه اصلاح شارپی که مارکت داشته نقدینگی سنگینی از بایرهارو هانت کرده ..
ولی بگین دوست دارین چه کوینی تحلیلش رو داشته باشین⁉️
XRP🪙61%
NOT🛩22%
SHIB🐶20%
ETC❇️21%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Shahryar_Rajaee کریپتو @Shahryaarrajaeecrypto · 468,243 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
Titan Signal سیگنال رایگان @TitanSignal · 111,472 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
WALL STREET🐳 @Wall_Team · 35,413 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
2929 @top2929 · 18,321 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 September 2026
👑 KKING CRYPTO | سیگنال کریپتو 👑 @KINGCRYPTO1 · 102,781 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
CAPITAN | SIGNAL | کریپتو | سیگنال | درآمد دلاری | بیتکوین | آموزش کریپتو | فارکس | طلا @Capitan_traderr · 21,036 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
Bufalo🦬crypto🔝 @bufalo_cryptoo · 26,337 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
زاپاس اخبار @short_cryptoo · 2 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
CRYPTO🚀ROCKET🔥 @jet_crypto1 · 41,891 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
Purya futures ₿ بازار مالی @Purya_Futures · 73,896 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
AlvandCrypto | اخبار کریپتو @AlvandCrypto · 31,061 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 September 2026
ADDWIN | CRYPTO & GOLD سیگنال @Addwin_VIP · 315,723 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
صرافی بیت یونیکس | Bitunix @BitunixxPersian · 20,129 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 September 2026
Coinlocally | کوین لوکالی @coin_locally · 212,564 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
UZ Trader | اموزش ترید | لایو ترید @uztraderclub · 216,121 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
سیگنال رایگان/ ارزدیجیتال و طلا /ARFANDX @arfandxcrypto · 34,310 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
Yegane Crypto | ترید @YeganeCrypto · 1,437,602 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Matin Crypto | ارز دیجیتال @MawtinCrypto_vip · 2,989,354 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto 248 @CryptoT248 · 50,848 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
Shayan crypto ارز دیجیتال | ترید | سیگنال @Shayan_cryptooo · 73,736 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Lord Auto trade bot💣👽لورد کریپتو بات|سیگنال رایگان|کریپتو |signal|ارزدیجیتال|ترید|ارزدیجیتال|ایردراپ| اموزشات الترای لورد @lordcryptovipbot · 25,418 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
سیگنال رایگان 🐊Crocodile Trade @crocodile_trade · 208,304 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
کریپتو فارکس | 🧠Ar3yBiT @Ar3yBiT · 715,209 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
ثروت با ارزدیجیتال💲 @silverbit · 123,706 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 112 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚜₿signal⚜” (@bsignal), 417,525 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bsignal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.