#BTC 1D 📊حرکت بعدی بیت کوین طبق رفتار های گذشته بازار
🔥14❤🔥5👍3

Channel
@khodayie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,987subscribers
-116 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001401623109 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khodayie |
| Description | ✅چارت ها نباید توسط مبتدیان استفاده شوند، فقط توسط کسانی استفاده شود که به دنبال تحلیل تکنیکال هستند تا فرصت های خوبی برای تأیید سطوح ورودی ارتباط با ما : @khodaayiee |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khodayie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 15,987 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 16,006 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 16,019 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 16,032 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 16,044 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 16,058 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 16,072 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 16,091 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 16,103 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 16,103 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (3 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,848 |
| Reactions total | 360 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
514 reactions across 26 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 217 | 42.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 173 | 33.7% | |
| 👌 | 61 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 7.78% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 2.14% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 1.36% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.973% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 514reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#BTC 1D 📊حرکت بعدی بیت کوین طبق رفتار های گذشته بازار
🔥14❤🔥5👍3
پیچم حتما همین حالا فالو کنید که ویدیو های جدید تو راهه🔥
❤🔥20
✅ثبت انجام بدید که با شروع بازار مالی دیگ تخفیفی وجود ندارد و قراره در آپدیت جدید با سیگنال های جدید کلی سود کنیم، مطمئن باشید که پشیمون نخواهید کرد🔥
👍9
✅ با توجه به شرایط دوستان تخفیف 74% ویژه کانال vip لحاظ کردیم و فقط تا اخر امشب با ظرفیت محدود فرصت دارید 🚫ظرفیت فقط 15 نفر ❇️هماهنگی و ثبت نام👇 @Khodaayiee
👌5
✅ پیچ جدید رو فالو کنید تا از فردا استراتژی های خاص رو ببنید👇 https://www.instagram.com/mhdikhodayie?igsh=MTlhaWtla2d3OW1kdA==
💯3😢3🔥1
🚀 نتایج VIP ماه جولای : 🔥 سود سیگنال : 1243%✅
👍6
#BTC 1D 📊بیت کوین 65 روز نوسان قیمت در بازده 67.5 - 57.5 دلار داشته است
👌16💯8👍4
#BTC 📊طلا رشد داشت اما بیت کوین درگیر عبور از مقاومت بوده ، با توجه به وضعیت فعلی مارکت ، سطح 62.000 دلار همچنان منطقه اصلاح حرکت نزولی است
❤🔥16👍7
📊در مسیر تحلیل بازار، هیچگاه خطای انسانی را انکار نکردهایم و نخواهیم کرد؛ اما تفاوت ما در این است که هیچگاه فریبِ گفتنِ حرفهای تکراری و کلیشهای را به خود ندادهایم. رسالت ما همواره جستوجوی لایههای پنهان بازار و ارائه دیدگاههای بکر و کاربردی بوده، نه تکرار تحلیلهای سطحی. به پشتوانه حمایت ارزشمند شما، مسیرمان را با تعهدی دوچندان برای کشفِ فرداهای روشنتر بازار ادامه میدهیم. از اعتماد بیبدیلتان سپاسگزارم.»
👍27❤🔥15💔7
⚠️سیلر داره میانگین متحرک ۲۰۰ هفتهای رو هیپ میکنه، در حالی که خودش میلیاردها دلار بیتکوین میفروشه. به این روایت دامن نزن. بر اساس تحلیلی که قبلاً منتشر شد، پیشبینی میکنیم بیتکوین ۵۰٪ پایینتر از میانگین متحرک ۲۰۰ هفتهای برسه: از ۶۴ هزار دلار به ۳۲ هزار دلار.
❤🔥21👌8👍4
فریب هیجان بازار رو نخورید ته قله احتمالاً خیلی پایینتر از چیزی میرسه که فکرش رو میکنید؛ چون هنوز خیلی از معاملهگرها ضرر ندیدن و بعضیها هنوز راحت با خریدای قدیمیشون نشستن. یه موج وحشت میاد که همه رو میلرزونه، درست مثل دفعات قبل که ته بازار رسیدیم. حتماً یه بازیگر بزرگ هم ورشکست میشه، درست مثل ماجرای صرافی FTX
👍20🔥3👌2
#BTC 1M 🚨توجه: ریزش بزرگ بیتکوین در راهه! طبق پیشبینی، احتمالاً از مهرماه (اکتبر) بیتکوین تا ۷۰٪ از اوج قیمتیاش پایین میاد. سال گذشته خیلیها گفتن که بازار میخواد بریزه، ولی خیلی کم بودن کسانی که واقعاً فروختن. ما در قیمت ۱۲۱ هزار دلاری به همه گفتیم که داراییهاتون رو به استیبلکوین (سکههای پایدار مثل تتر) تبدیل کنید و از اون موقع تا حالا هیچ خرید جدیدی انجام ندادیم. امسال عوامل زیادی دست به دست هم دادن که مهر…
👍25🔥4❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @khodayie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@khodayie edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 256,062 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مهدی خدایی | کریپتو” (@khodayie), 15,987 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khodayie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.