Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -718. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140,578–142,347 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 14:16
140,782
-682
19 Sept 2026, 17:20
141,464
-105
17 Sept 2026, 02:56
141,569
-60
15 Sept 2026, 03:56
141,629
-23
13 Sept 2026, 11:01
141,652
-117
11 Sept 2026, 16:38
141,769
-181
9 Sept 2026, 01:40
141,950
-181
5 Sept 2026, 19:58
142,131
+41
3 Sept 2026, 18:56
142,090
-11
2 Sept 2026, 07:44
142,101
-21
1 Sept 2026, 11:13
142,122
-21
31 Aug 2026, 08:43
142,143
+152
30 Aug 2026, 08:05
141,991
+951
29 Aug 2026, 04:46
141,040
+177
28 Aug 2026, 02:19
140,863
-46
27 Aug 2026, 01:04
140,909
-26
26 Aug 2026, 04:23
140,935
+109
25 Aug 2026, 03:33
140,826
-49
23 Aug 2026, 23:28
140,875
-120
22 Aug 2026, 08:28
140,995
first reading
Engagement
535 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.39%
avg views ÷ 140,782 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,400
254 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.432%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
254
of 535 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
535 (6 August 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
2,644,090
Reactions total
11,421
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,600
Videos
≈9,510
Links
≈181
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 55m
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 424 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22,305 reactions across 534 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
4,552
20.4%
😁
3,644
16.3%
❤
3,229
14.5%
💩
1,796
8.05%
🤬
1,734
7.77%
👏
1,303
5.84%
🙏
1,115
5.00%
😱
892
4.00%
😢
815
3.65%
👍
643
2.88%
😭
606
2.72%
🤡
542
2.43%
👎
395
1.77%
🥴
206
0.924%
😡
108
0.484%
🔥
84
0.377%
🌚
71
0.318%
🕊
64
0.287%
😨
64
0.287%
🥰
50
0.224%
33 further kinds
392
1.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 534 of the 535 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,305 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 535 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 535 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hanoi24hnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 535 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Em zai người Việt thu lại iPhone 18 để ra Kai bán kiếm lời nhưng lại thu đúng pháp sư Việt Nam cho cục sắt vào hộp iPhone để lừa đồng hương .
Khốn nạn thật🥲
Khả năng Kai sẽ gọi cảnh sát Nhật đến để bế về đồn
Kiểu này mất cả tương lai rồi em !
Giang hồ cộm cán Nguyễn Minh Đức, biệt danh “Đức Cộng” bị bắt về hành vi “Tổ chức sử dụng trái phép chất ma túy”.
Ngày 16/9/2026, Cơ quan Cảnh sát điều tra Công an tỉnh Ninh Bình đã thi hành Lệnh giữ người trong trường hợp khẩn cấp, Quyết định tạm giữ, Lệnh bắt người bị giữ trong trường hợp khẩn cấp đối với Nguyễn Minh Đức, sinh năm 1981, trú tại số 35 Ngô Sỹ Liên, phường Nam Định, tỉnh Ninh Bình về hành vi “Tổ chức …
😮Camera ghi lại khoảnh khắc kinh hoàng:
Sáng nay, Container mất lái lao như tên, thùng xe văng đập thẳng vào đầu kéo đi ngược chiều!🙏
(*) Nguồn: CAX Văn Bàn - Lào Cai.
🚨Con gái không có thai nhưng nói dối bác sĩ đòi mổ bỏ thai: Cả gia đình kéo nhau lên chửi bệnh viện
=> Bố đẻ bị bắt khẩn cấp
Câu chuyện tưởng như chỉ có trong phim vừa xảy ra tại Vĩnh Phúc, Phú Thọ.
Theo thông tin từ cơ quan Công an, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Ánh (SN 1999, trú tại xã Hợp Lý, tỉnh Phú Thọ) nói với gia đình rằng mình đang mang thai. Đến ngày 17/9, gia đình đưa Ánh đến Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương kiểm tra thì nh…
May là không có phương tiện nào gần đây….
sự việc vào khoảng 9h30 ngày 17/9, tại đường Tỉnh Lộ 8, xã Bình Mỹ, thành phố Hồ Chí Minh (đoạn khu vực Hòa Phú cũ)
Đây là lý do vì sao lúc lên xe nhất định phải thắt dây an toàn. 🚗
Không ai biết sự cố sẽ xảy ra lúc nào, nhưng một chiếc dây an toàn có thể giúp bảo vệ bạn trong khoảnh khắc quan trọng nhất.
Lơ xe may mắn chỉ bị xây xát nhẹ
‼️VỤ MANG HUNG KHÍ TẤN CÔNG NGƯỜI Ở HẢI PHÒNG: "ĐỘC CÔ CỬU KIẾM" VÀ ĐỒNG BỌN HIỆN ĐÃ AN TOẠ TRÊN ĐỒN
Kết quả điều tra ban đầu xác định nguyên nhân vụ việc xuất phát từ mâu thuẫn trước đó giữa Hoàng Tiến Thịnh, sinh năm 2003, trú tại phường Hải An với anh trai sinh đôi của anh L.H.H
Nhóm đối tượng của Thịnh đã nhầm anh L.H.H là người có mâu thuẫn nên đã sử dụng hung khí tấn công làm anh H bị thương.
Theo: Công an t…
Đến 9h sáng nay, công tác tìm kiếm vẫn đang diễn ra tại hiện trường vụ nam sinh nghi mất tích khi đi qua đường ngập ở Hà Nội. Hai người nhái thay nhau đeo bình dưỡng khí chui xuống cống trong điều kiện nước chảy xiết.
❤13😢12👍3🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 535 posts we hold for @hanoi24hnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tâm Linh PHUKET [ Channel ] @tamlinhphuket · 21,949 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 September 2026
TIN TỨC 24H ĐÔNG NAM Á CHO AE HÓNG🇻🇳 @QH5858 · 27,651 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 10 September 2026
Theanh28Entertainment - Official @theanh28entertainmentofficial · 394,730 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
Team FUKET [ Channel ] @fuketteam · 81,699 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Kênh Tin Tức 24h HOT @qh88kenhtintuchot · 47,307 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
Myanmar Civil War True Facts (MCWTF) @MCWTF · 103,255 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 3 September 2026
Cừu Vàng Lông Đỏ @puzlevn · 22,700 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 September 2026
Tin nóng chiến sự Nga - Ukraina @tinnongchiensu · 34,405 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 September 2026
Nước Nga nghiêm túc @Waroftho · 45,928 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
Trà đá vỉa hè @tra_da_via_he · 26,912 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HÀ NỘI 24H Channel” (@hanoi24hnews), 140,782 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hanoi24hnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.