Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CHECK VAR ĐƯỜNG PHỐ

Channel

CHECK VAR ĐƯỜNG PHỐ

@checkvarduongphotelegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

78,278subscribers

-68 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002427902655
TypeChannel
Username@checkvarduongphotelegram
DescriptionTin tức News Liên hệ đăng bài -gửi tin @Checkvarduongpho
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/checkvarduongphotelegram

Growth

78,11278,44078,2768 August 2026 — 78,346 subscribers8 August 2026 — 78,332 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78,300 subscribers10 August 2026 — 78,271 subscribers11 August 2026 — 78,240 subscribers12 August 2026 — 78,197 subscribers13 August 2026 — 78,181 subscribers14 August 2026 — 78,131 subscribers16 August 2026 — 78,112 subscribers17 August 2026 — 78,297 subscribers18 August 2026 — 78,420 subscribers20 August 2026 — 78,375 subscribers21 August 2026 — 78,340 subscribers22 August 2026 — 78,291 subscribers24 August 2026 — 78,405 subscribers25 August 2026 — 78,412 subscribers26 August 2026 — 78,399 subscribers27 August 2026 — 78,367 subscribers28 August 2026 — 78,328 subscribers29 August 2026 — 78,298 subscribers30 August 2026 — 78,409 subscribers31 August 2026 — 78,440 subscribers1 September 2026 — 78,415 subscribers2 September 2026 — 78,383 subscribers3 September 2026 — 78,344 subscribers5 September 2026 — 78,278 subscribers78,2788 August 20265 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 28 days, net -68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78,063–78,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 04:3878,278-66
3 Sept 2026, 08:4878,344-39
2 Sept 2026, 03:2378,383-32
1 Sept 2026, 04:0478,415-25
31 Aug 2026, 01:4378,440+31
30 Aug 2026, 02:4578,409+111
29 Aug 2026, 02:5578,298-30
28 Aug 2026, 03:5478,328-39
27 Aug 2026, 04:2978,367-32
26 Aug 2026, 01:3478,399-13
25 Aug 2026, 04:5678,412+7
24 Aug 2026, 02:5478,405+114
22 Aug 2026, 09:2478,291-49
21 Aug 2026, 00:5678,340-35
20 Aug 2026, 00:5178,375-45
18 Aug 2026, 22:1578,420+123
17 Aug 2026, 19:1478,297+185
16 Aug 2026, 15:0978,112-19
14 Aug 2026, 23:5478,131-50
13 Aug 2026, 18:2978,181first reading

Engagement

166 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.43%
avg views ÷ 78,278 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,390
155 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
155
of 166 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 153 of 155 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held166 (4 August 20266 September 2026)
Views total1,144,730
Reactions total2,152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Sept 2026, 18:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,380
Videos
1,000
Links
57

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 46m
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 118 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,258 reactions across 162 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,02845.5%
😁29813.2%
🤣2179.61%
😱1124.96%
👍1074.74%
🤬934.12%
😢753.32%
👏582.57%
🙏472.08%
💩421.86%
😡190.841%
😭180.797%
👎160.709%
🥴160.709%
🤡140.62%
🤮140.62%
🤔130.576%
🔥120.531%
🥱120.531%
🥰110.487%
9 further kinds361.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 166 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @checkvarduongphotelegram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 166 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 04:19 UTC≈4,680 views3 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

Vụ việc xảy ra chiều qua tại ngã ba đèn đỏ Cam Ranh Khánh Hoà

3

6 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC≈4,610 views28 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

“Chú thấp kém quá, không dám xưng tên…” Hôm nay, trên đường Phạm Văn Đồng, Thủ Đức, mình gặp một chú sống lang thang, ngày ngày nhặt ve chai và những thứ người ta bỏ đi để kiếm sống. Hỏi chú tên gì, chú im lặng một lúc rồi nói: “Chú thấp kém quá, không dám xưng tên.” Một câu nói nghe nhẹ tênh nhưng khiến người ta chạnh lòng. Giữa thành phố đông đúc, chú lại tự thấy mình nhỏ bé đến mức không dám nói ra tên của mình

27👍1

5 Sept 2026, 14:26 UTC≈6,920 views14 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

Phá dỡ cổng nhà ở Lâm Đồng, người đàn ông bị trụ bê tông đè tuvong

😢86

5 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈8,010 views26 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

🛑 UÔNG BÍ, QUẢNG NINH: CHỜ CƠ QUAN CHỨC NĂNG XÁC MINH Chưa rõ nguyên nhân và diễn biến đầy đủ, hình ảnh ghi lại cảnh một người đàn ông cầm dao đe dọa và có hành động tác động vào vùng mặt của một nam sinh. Nam sinh có biểu hiện hoảng loạn, chỉ biết “dạ, vâng” và chịu trận. Hiện vụ việc đang chờ lực lượng chức năng xác minh, làm rõ và xử lý theo quy định.

11😡9🤣3😨3

5 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC≈7,740 views15 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

Cô hơi toát mồ hôi tí thôi

9👍5🤬1

5 Sept 2026, 06:57 UTC≈8,670 views10 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Thanh Lãm - Phú Lương - Hà Nội: thanh niên người Hòa Bình vào đền mẫu làng lấy gốc cây xoài làm điểm tựa,chân không chạm ₫ất 🥶

👌5🙏41

5 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC≈9,180 views16 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Đi ăn theo review tiktok nên qua đây ăn thử , không ngờ ở Hà Đông giờ vẫn có quán cơm ngon và giá hợp lý thế này mọi người ạ 😋 Tổng bill mình ăn 548K/6 người lớn ăn no, món ăn vừa miệng, phòng điều hòa mát mà giá khá dễ chịu ae ạ Nhân viên cũng khá xinh Quán ở 88 Vũ Trọng Khánh,Phường Hà Đông,HN Sẽ quay lại ủng hộ dài dài

16

4 Sept 2026, 05:37 UTC≈10,500 views29 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

Nhà phát minh Pakistan đang giới thiệu chiếc xe tự lái thì chan luôn xe cảnh sát. Sự việc xảy ra hôm qua 31/8.

😁272

4 Sept 2026, 05:37 UTC≈10,300 views4 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

48 giờ truy bắt đối tượng dùng dao uy hiếp nhân viên siêu thị, cướp tiền bất thành rồi giật điện thoại bỏ trốn. Ngày 3/9, Công an phường Đại Mỗ, thành phố Hà Nội cho biết, đơn vị đã bắt giữ Lường Văn Tiến (SN 2000, trú tại xã Thuận Châu, tỉnh Sơn La) để điều tra về hành vi cướp tài sản. Sau đó, Tiến được bàn giao cho Cơ quan Cảnh sát điều tra - Công an TP Hà Nội để tiếp tục xử lý theo quy định.

4

4 Sept 2026, 05:23 UTC≈9,790 views3 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

Bắc Ninh: Nội soi can thiệp gắp thành công dị vật trong trực tràng nam sinh lớp 9

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @checkvarduongphotelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CHECK VAR ĐƯỜNG PHỐ” (@checkvarduongphotelegram), 78,278 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/checkvarduongphotelegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.