Đ HIỂU KIỂU GÌ: Thanh niên ko có vé nhưng ngang nhiên khệnh khạng ngồi ghế của người khác. Hai cô chú nói hết nước hết cái mặt thanh niên vẫn cứ TRƠ TRƠ

Channel
TIN TỨC ( VIỆT - CAM )
@TINTUCVC247
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,227subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001965118913 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TINTUCVC247 |
| Description | Liên hệ đăng bài: @XiaoYu8313 Nhóm chát: @tintucvc |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TINTUCVC247 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 9,227 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 9,244 | -27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 9,271 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 9,274 | first reading |
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.89%
- avg views ÷ 9,227 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 359
- 75 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.275%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 75
- of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 75 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (19 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,925 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈17,400
- Videos
- ≈10,400
- Links
- ≈4,140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 49m 03s
- Average length
- 50s
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Xôn xao đoạn video Tiktoker Nờ ô Nô bị 1 chị gái dùng tay "hỏi thăm" rất mạnh trên sóng livestream đang viral khắp MXH
🤣2🔥1
Đang quay video để lưu giữ lại cảm xúc đi bão, cứ thấy phía sau có người hô” Việt Nam vô địch” thì bạn nữ này bị bà cô phía sau thò tay móc luôn chiếc IPhone 17 PRM. Video sắc nét thế này thì cô có muốn cãi chắc cũng khó rồi 🤡
🤩🤩🤩🤩⭐️🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⭐️ MỪNG QUỐC KHÁNH 2/9 – BÙNG NỔ LÌ XÌ HÀNG TRĂM TỶ! 🚀 NHÂN ĐÔI ĐIỂM VIP – BỨT TỐC THĂNG HẠNG! 📌 ĐẶC QUYỀN QUỐC KHÁNH – ƯU ĐÃI NẠP TIỀN LÊN ĐẾN 50%! 😵 NHIỆM VỤ CHƠI VUI MỖI NGÀY - NHẬN THƯỞNG ĐÃ TAY 🔥 🌐 HỢP TÁC TÀI TRỢ 3 GÃ KHỔNG LỒ REAL MADRID, ATL. MADRID & FC BARCELONA MÙA GIẢI 2026–2027 🇪🇸 🇪🇸 🇪🇸 🌟🎁TÍCH ĐIỂM ĐỔI QUÀ🎁🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 XE SANG 🤩🤩🤩🤩 VINFAST LIMO GREEN 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 IPHONE 17 🤩🤩🤩🤩 …
Đỉnh cao người Thái😮 Ghi tới 4 bàn ở một trận chung kết nhưng vẫn thua =)))
Đô Lương - Nghệ An ngay lúc này Mọi người đi "Bão" cận thận nhé, tuân thủ an toàn giao thông
Khoảnh khắc kinh hoàng: Trận lũ quét ầm ầm đổ xuống từ sườn núi ở Nepal trong khi phụ nữ và trẻ em la hét vì hoảng loạn tột độ. Số phận của họ hiện vẫn chưa rõ. Nhiều người có vẻ chủ quan, đã chạy được lên núi rồi thì không lên cao hơn nữa mà lại còn đứng tít ở dưới xem lũ. Khả năng cao là... Ít nhất 95 người thiệt mạng — hơn 400 du khách mất tích, bao gồm công dân Mỹ, Anh và Ấn Độ.
❗TNLĐ ở khu công nghiệp nam Đồng Phú, Bình Phước (cũ): Nghe bảo nạn nhân không qua khỏi 🙏
Vợ bảo chồng đến phiên dịch và giúp đỡ ông sếp, Nhưng anh chồng đi theo bắt được phiên dịch trong nhà nghỉ.
VỤ NÀY GAY CẤN THỰC SỰ 🤡 Hoá ra không phải nam giả nữ vào nhà vs nữ quay lén, mà là nam có ngoại hình nữ vào nhà vs nam quay lén nam 🥹 Bạn nam áo đen nghĩa hiệp trong clip là đòi công lý cho chính mình luôn chứ không phải cho bạn nữ nào...
❤1😁1
TNGT tại đường Nguyễn Thị Định - TP.HCM , Sau va quệt nạn nhân văng qua giải phân cách bị xe Container Cán Tuvong !
🤩🤩🤩🤩⭐️🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⭐️ MỪNG QUỐC KHÁNH 2/9 – BÙNG NỔ LÌ XÌ HÀNG TRĂM TỶ! 🚀 NHÂN ĐÔI ĐIỂM VIP – BỨT TỐC THĂNG HẠNG! 📌 ĐẶC QUYỀN QUỐC KHÁNH – ƯU ĐÃI NẠP TIỀN LÊN ĐẾN 50%! 😵 NHIỆM VỤ CHƠI VUI MỖI NGÀY - NHẬN THƯỞNG ĐÃ TAY 🔥 🌐 HỢP TÁC TÀI TRỢ 3 GÃ KHỔNG LỒ REAL MADRID, ATL. MADRID & FC BARCELONA MÙA GIẢI 2026–2027 🇪🇸 🇪🇸 🇪🇸 🌟🎁TÍCH ĐIỂM ĐỔI QUÀ🎁🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 XE SANG 🤩🤩🤩🤩 VINFAST LIMO GREEN 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 IPHONE 17 🤩🤩🤩🤩 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @TINTUCVC247. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tintucnew_247 · 72,788
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 August 2026
@qh88kenhtintuchot · 48,487
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
@tin_tuc3 · 52,148
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 24 August 2026
@tichtactichtac · 67,459
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 21 August 2026
@theanh28entertainmentofficial · 398,638
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
@xg66661 · 81,201
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 20 August 2026
@viet_nam · 81,291
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 20 August 2026
@KenhNhacLotMusic · 107,370
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TIN TỨC ( VIỆT - CAM )” (@TINTUCVC247), 9,227 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TINTUCVC247.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.