Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

翻翻墙 | 机场评测

@ffqchannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57,569subscribers

+489 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001566003179
TypeChannel
Username@ffqchannel
DescriptionFFQ.LA翻翻墙机场导航机场评测频道。 尽可能的推荐最稳定的ss/vmess/trojan等机场。 群组: @FFQGroup 通知频道: @ffq_la 评测频道: @ffqchannel 监测通知: @FFQCheckNotice 评测投稿联系: @ffq_pm_bot 客服(有问题留言):@FFQServiceBot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ffqchannel

Growth

57,08057,56957,324.56 August 2026 — 57,080 subscribers6 August 2026 — 57,096 subscribers7 August 2026 — 57,190 subscribers8 August 2026 — 57,259 subscribers9 August 2026 — 57,356 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57,415 subscribers11 August 2026 — 57,470 subscribers12 August 2026 — 57,569 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +489. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57,007–57,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:1357,569+99
11 Aug 2026, 05:4657,470+55
10 Aug 2026, 08:1157,415+59
9 Aug 2026, 09:1157,356+97
8 Aug 2026, 11:3757,259+69
7 Aug 2026, 15:1057,190+94
6 Aug 2026, 12:3057,096+16
6 Aug 2026, 09:0657,080first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.68%
avg views ÷ 57,569 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.546%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held27 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total57,223
Reactions total304
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
346
Videos
2
Links
2,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎18769.8%
👍4316.0%
3814.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
44.4%
12 of 27 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
2,030
over 12 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,210
over 15 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,190 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#滕王阁 #vless 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★☆☆☆ 速度 ★☆☆☆☆ 延迟 ★★★★☆ 性价比 ★☆☆☆☆ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀 链接导航 官网:点击进入 群组:https://t.me/twg520com1 频道:https://t.me/twg520com 套餐:https://t.me/ffqimages/234 2026年7月25日更新 😀主观点评 晚高峰测试,拉完了,稳定性较差, 😀翻翻墙提醒您 任何机场都有跑路可能,建议仅月付,以降低风险。(本消息不针对任何机场)

👎131

12 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,290 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#七喜机场 #Trojan 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★★☆☆ 速度 ★★☆☆☆ 延迟 ★★★☆☆ 性价比 ★★★☆☆ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀机场自介: 全直连优化,多入口负载,定期发放永久公益套餐! 😀 链接导航 开业:2026.2 官网:点击进入 频道:https://t.me/qixi_info 群组:https://t.me/qixi_group 优惠:无 套餐:https://t.me/ffqimages/237 2026年7月28日更新 论坛:https://www.ffqla.net/thread-1039-1-1.html 😀主观点评 晚高峰测试,比上次好一些,电信用户不建议购买 😀翻翻墙提醒您 任何机场都有跑路可能,建议仅月付,以降低风险。(本消息不针对任何机场)

👎41

12 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,530 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

✈️ 哆啦A梦VPN👈 | IEPL 高速专线 (永久官网地址↑) 🚨三网G口独享:无Q/无通报 带宽:不限速/最高 1000M 线路:IPLC专线线路+家宽 节点:40+ 个国家/地区节点 追求速度 被折腾够了的来! 多倍率保证三网晚高峰专线水平! 🎫马年 Vip3及以上 半年7.5折: BN2026 例:Vip2-135G 会员 15元 🎫马年 Vip3及以上 年付6折 : NF2026 例:Vip2-135G 会员 12元 →→点击前往下单-Aff返利:20%←← 无法支付请关梯子重试 官方频道 | 官方群组 | 测速报告 #AD

👎1

12 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC≈1,920 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

🚀 V2PAW|三线接入 · 金融专线 · 全球节点 ⚡️ IEPL + 无 QoS = 稳定低延迟,跨境游戏/办公/金融交易无压力 🔐 自动分组 → 不怕攻击/通报,安全无忧 🌍 沪美 京德 沪韩→ 小众优质加速节点 💡 月付仅15起 → 一顿饭钱享稳定安心全球畅连 官网 #AD

👎2

11 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈2,500 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#魔戒 #vmess #用户投稿 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★☆☆☆ 速度 ★☆☆☆☆ 延迟 ★★☆☆☆ 性价比 ★★★☆☆ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀 链接导航 官网:http://xn--xnun88j.com 群组:https://t.me/Lord_Rings 频道:https://t.me/The_Lord_Rings 😀主观点评 晚高峰测试,著名按量计费机场,到现在也开了挺久的,用户数量巨大,速度较差,只适合防失联,不适合当主力, 😀翻翻墙提醒您 任何机场都有跑路可能,建议仅月付,以降低风险。(本消息不针对任何机场)

👎192

11 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,670 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#上帝世界 #vless 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★☆☆☆ 速度 ★★☆☆☆ 延迟 ★★★★☆ 性价比 ★★☆☆☆ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀机场自介: 电信cn2gia,联通9929,移动CMIN2 😀 链接导航 开业:2026.4 官网:点击进入 频道:https://t.me/godworldcom1 群组:https://t.me/godworldcom 套餐:https://t.me/ffqimages/210 2026年4月30日更新 论坛:https://www.ffqla.net/thread-929-1-1.html 😀主观点评 晚高峰测试,支棱了没2次就不行了,只有电信能用,复用比较多,稳定性较差 😀翻翻墙提醒您 任何机场都有跑路可能,建议仅月付,以降低风险。(本消息不针对任何机场)

👎13

11 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,650 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#Nowhere #anytls #vless 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★☆☆☆ 速度 ★★★☆☆ 延迟 ★★☆☆☆ 性价比 ★★★☆☆ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀 机场自介 海外BGP优化线路 😀 链接导航 开业:2026.6 官网:点击进入 频道:https://t.me/nowherenet_channel 群组:https://t.me/nowherenet_group 套餐:https://t.me/ffqimages/223 2026年6月21日更新 论坛:https://www.ffqla.net/thread-993-1-1.html 😀主观点评 晚高峰测试,前段时间开业的一家低价直连,价格18元一年 每月128g,速度方面建议根据测速图选择适合自己运营商的节点,稳定性稍差一点点,不过修复的速度还是不错的 😀翻翻墙提醒您 任何机场都有跑路可能,建议仅月付,以降低风险。(本消息不针对任何机场)

👎5👍1

11 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,050 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

🚀 苹果端最佳一键客户端 | Nextin(星拓)已上架App Store 告别频繁购买小火箭账号,内置官网,客服,提升用户留存率 ✨ 全面兼容主流面板 SSPanel-Metron / V2Board / XiaoV2Board / XBoard / PPanel 一键接入,无需复杂适配 ⚡️ 协议全覆盖 · 稳定优先 支持 Trojan / VLESS XHTTP/ AnyTLS / Shadowsocks 等主流协议 🎯 专为机场场景打造 ✔️ 超多自定义配置,包括UA,客服,公告,延迟优化功能 ✔️ 苹果全端支持,iPhone,iPad,Mac,Apple TV 🔐 订阅加密 点击查看文档 💰 价格方案 小机场套餐:19.9U / 月 |149U / 年。更有不限人数买断套餐! 📩 快速接入 老板:@nextin_app 自助下单 & 对接:@NextinApp_bot 💬 个人用户免费使用,交流群: 点击加入

👎2

10 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈2,820 views26 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

#星链starlink #trojan #hy2 #用户投稿 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★☆☆☆ 速度 ★☆☆☆☆ 延迟 ★★☆☆☆ 性价比 ★★☆☆☆ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀 链接导航 开业:2025.3.2 官网:https://xship.top 频道:https://t.me/starlinkx2077 群组:https://t.me/starlink_2077 😀主观点评 晚高峰测试,价格未知,节点一大堆,能用的没几个,速度极差,除了地区多没有任何优点 😀翻翻墙提醒您 任何机场都有跑路可能,建议仅月付,以降低风险。(本消息不针对任何机场)

👎222👍2

10 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC945 viewsread 10 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

✈️ 哆啦A梦VPN👈 | IEPL 高速专线 (永久官网地址↑) 🚨三网G口独享:无Q/无通报 带宽:不限速/最高 1000M 线路:IPLC专线线路+家宽 节点:40+ 个国家/地区节点 追求速度 被折腾够了的来! 多倍率保证三网晚高峰专线水平! 🎫马年 Vip3及以上 半年7.5折: BN2026 例:Vip2-135G 会员 15元 🎫马年 Vip3及以上 年付6折 : NF2026 例:Vip2-135G 会员 12元 →→点击前往下单-Aff返利:20%←← 无法支付请关梯子重试 官方频道 | 官方群组 | 测速报告 #AD

10 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC≈1,490 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

🚀 V2PAW|三线接入 · 金融专线 · 全球节点 ⚡️ IEPL + 无 QoS = 稳定低延迟,跨境游戏/办公/金融交易无压力 🔐 自动分组 → 不怕攻击/通报,安全无忧 🌍 沪美 京德 沪韩→ 小众优质加速节点 💡 月付仅15起 → 一顿饭钱享稳定安心全球畅连 官网 #AD

👍1

8 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈3,460 views61 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

#吹雪云 #vless #推荐 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★★★☆ 速度 ★★★☆☆ 延迟 ★★★☆☆ 性价比 ★★★★★ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀机场自介: 亚马逊优质线路阵容,节点资源强大,四网网络深度优化,移动 / 联通 / 电信/广电都能稳定畅连。采用高质量 Amazon 线路资源,热门地区节点覆盖,支持多场景使用。实力技术团队长期维护,稳定可靠!不记录日志,保护你的上网隐私。支持多平台客户端,iOS、Windows、Mac、安卓等设备均可使用。线路持续优化,晚高峰也能保持稳定体验。适配不同网络环境,减少卡顿、掉线和绕路问题。注册即送 7 天试用套餐,先体验再选择。 😀 链接导航 开业:2026.6 官网:点击进入 频道:https://t.me/chuixueyun 群组:https://t.me/chuixueyun_chat 套餐:https://t.me/ffqimages/225 2026年6月29日更新

👍3314👎14

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ffqchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 79,343 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“翻翻墙 | 机场评测” (@ffqchannel), 57,569 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ffqchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.