泰国曼谷 BGP 测速点: http://th-bgp.bkk.lg.kuaichedao.xyz/
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费

Channel
@KuaiCheDao_Info
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,997subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001379607429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KuaiCheDao_Info |
| Created | 28 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KuaiCheDao_Info |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 6,997 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 6,999 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 6,997 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 6,995 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (21 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 54,964 |
| Reactions total | 134 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
118 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 41 | 34.7% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 24.6% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 20.3% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 5.08% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.24% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
泰国曼谷 BGP 测速点: http://th-bgp.bkk.lg.kuaichedao.xyz/
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
【远程手服务需求】【美国】【硅谷】服务器维护。 必要工具:螺丝刀、光笔、配合远程调试工具。 任务范围: - 配合远程拆除服务器硬盘 - 配合寻找物理光纤并重插 日期:2026-08-11 工作时长:预计2-3小时 酬金:300 美元。 联系发布者:@NUBE_Nick #美国 #SJC #需求 #Requirements
🤡6
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
港新日美雲服務裸金屬 - 牛彼☁️ pinned «求租 TWNIC 或 APNIC 授出给台湾主体的 IPv4 地址 。请联系 @BeefyAsian 。»
求租 TWNIC 或 APNIC 授出给台湾主体的 IPv4 地址 。请联系 @BeefyAsian 。
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
🚀 Kimi K3 已在牛彼云 MaaS 正式上线 如果你正在为 Agent、Coding 或多模态应用寻找一个能力足够强、调用成本又能真正跑得起的模型,Kimi K3 值得认真了解一下。 K3 并不只是靠“2.8T 参数”吸引眼球。它采用 MoE 架构,每次推理激活约 104B 参数,并同时具备: • 1M(100 万)Tokens 超长上下文 • 文本、图像、视频多模态输入 • Tool Use 与复杂逻辑推理 • 面向大型代码库和长周期 Coding 任务的能力 • 适合自主 Agent、深度研究和端到端知识工作 从公开评测来看,K3 已处于开放权重模型的第一梯队。我们也想坦诚说明:它并非在每项测试中都排名第一,官方报告也承认其综合能力仍略逊于 Claude Fable 5 和 GPT-5.6 Sol;但在多项 Coding、Agent 与视觉评测中,它已经能够与闭源前沿模型正面竞争,部分指标甚至取得领先。 更具…
❤1👍1
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
我掐指一算,下周 Nube 云的 BKK 可用区要开卖。
💩3
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
Photo, posted without a caption
😁5🐳4
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
欢迎各位大哥大姐、美女帅哥,去 TrustPilot 把我们的服务夸奖几句,顺便打个 5🌟 好评。感谢! 点此直达 TrustPilot 的 Nube Cloud 页面 。
💩10❤2
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
网传 DeepSeek 将调整 Token 单价,Nube 会等比例调整。不再另行通知。
💩23
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
[Nube AI] DeepSeek V4 Flash 最新版已上线生产。
❤2
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
🚨 【重要通知】第三期 IPv4 买断团购进展更新 1. 近期动态 卖方公司董事会已于 7 月 31 日如期召开,并针对 IP 资产出售事宜进行了深入讨论。由于涉及细节较多,会议当日暂未达成最终决议。 2. 后续安排 - 再次审议: 董事会定于美国当地时间 8 月 3 日再次就该事项进行讨论并投票。 - 结果确认: 预计在香港时间 8 月 4 日(周二)白天,我们将获得明确的最终结果。 3. 我们的承诺 我们会持续跟进并第一时间在频道内同步消息。感谢大家的耐心等待与对本次团购的大力支持! 2026 年 8 月 3 日
❤2
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
📢 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 部署进度更新 原计划于今天(8 月 1 日)上线的 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731,目前可能需要延期。 现有的 DeepSeek-V4-Flash Preview 版本运行在华为昇腾 8 卡服务器上。由于 0731 版本引入了小幅架构更新,我们需要重新完成适配和测试,因此今天大概率无法顺利上线。 目前预计于下周结束前完成部署,并替换现有的 DeepSeek-V4-Flash。具体时间仍可能根据适配进度调整,感谢大家的耐心等待与理解! https://nube.sh/zh-cn/promote/ai-model
❤3
Signed 港日美服务器托管 🉑皮燕子付费
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @KuaiCheDao_Info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 174,925 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“港新日美雲服務裸金屬 - 牛彼☁️” (@KuaiCheDao_Info), 6,997 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KuaiCheDao_Info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.