Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 吹雪云官方频道

Channel

吹雪云官方频道

@chuixueyun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,525subscribers

+440 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004498739626
TypeChannel
Username@chuixueyun
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 19 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chuixueyun

Growth

1,0851,5251,3057 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,090 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,316 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,525 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +440. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,019–1,591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:541,525+209
11 Aug 2026, 11:371,316+226
8 Aug 2026, 10:131,090+5
8 Aug 2026, 00:061,085no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:341,085first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
237.2%
avg views ÷ 1,525 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,620
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.571%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held8 (19 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total10,850
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5032.5%
👍4730.5%
🤡4026.0%
🤮85.19%
🤣42.60%
🖕21.30%
😁21.30%
🔥10.649%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC≈2,590 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☁️最近问的频率最高的几个问题进行了总结☁️ 补充一条 目前电报是有下载限速的,新号50GB以内不限制,所以你下载东西感觉速度飞快,一旦触发限制,就会限制1-5MB/S的速度,这也就是为什么说第二天速度不如第一天的原因 还有如果你用第三方,第三方是有提速功能,但是电报是有云端限速的,举例子它允许你一分钟内最大下载的文件大小为100MB,然后你10秒提前跑完了,剩下的50秒就只能等着,这也就是直观上面的断流或者说为什么一会有速度一会没速度的原因 解决方法也很简单:开会员,花钱就行了! 因为电报限速导致的速度慢机场不背锅!

9

19 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC≈4,520 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎉感谢您近期参与我们的投票互动。根据最终的票选结果,为答谢广大用户的支持与关注,我们决定临时增发一轮限时折扣活动。 📌 活动细则 ​优惠内容: 凭专属代码可享订单 6 折 优惠。 ​优惠代码: 6折优惠券 ​有效期限: 7月20日 00:00 至 7月24日 23:59 活动已结束! ​请您在活动期间内,于提交订单页面准确输入上述优惠代码,系统将自动为您核算折扣金额。感谢您的陪伴,祝您使用愉快!

🤡276🤮5

18 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC≈3,740 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

还需要优惠券吗?

  1. 需要优惠券,希望安排活动65%
  2. 暂时不需要优惠券38%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11🤮3😁1

14 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC≈4,630 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

@eeeeeertdd 傻逼玩意抹黑别人上嘴皮子一碰就说是提建议我们不接受然后我们踢了你,来看看你提的意见是什么,别人说一句你就玻璃心破了开始破防了,别人说一句话你都把人家族谱问候一遍了,这就是你说的提意见吗?原来意见还能这样提?是我们没提醒群里不允许骂人还是公告没写?他妈的心脏的人到哪里都脏。买这个号的人私信联系我,我给你邮箱改成自己的,省的以后有邮箱系统还整个找回的马戏

👍40🤡134🤣4🖕2

29 Jun 2026, 02:24 UTC≈5,740 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 吹雪云.com ⚡️ 速度体验 亚马逊优质线路阵容,节点资源强大,四网网络深度优化,移动 / 联通 / 电信/广电都能稳定畅连。 低延迟、高速率,刷视频、看直播、办公都更顺滑。 🌎 节点配置 采用高质量 Amazon 线路资源,热门地区节点覆盖,支持多场景使用。 线路持续优化,晚高峰也能保持稳定体验。 适配不同网络环境,减少卡顿、掉线和绕路问题。 🔒 稳定保障 实力技术团队长期维护,稳定可靠! 不记录日志,保护你的上网隐私。 支持多平台客户端,iOS、Windows、Mac、安卓等设备均可使用。 💎 超值福利 低至 2 元 / 128G / 月,低价优质,性价比拉满。 不限时和月付套餐多种选择。 🚀 吹雪云.com 立即注册体验高速稳定网络! 📱 官网 📱 频道 📱 群组

👍75

28 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC≈4,250 viewsread 8 August 2026

📢温馨提示: 👉 机场的使用教程已经上传到官方文档,可以登录官方之后到文档内查看。 😄 注册账号时请务必妥善保存自己的邮箱账号和密码。由于当前暂无邮箱找回系统,后续会增加邮局系统,可以使用邮箱找回 3️⃣ 体验套餐为限时活动,活动时间有限,具体截止时间将另行通知,请以最新公告为准。

19 Jun 2026, 02:12 UTC≈5,500 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

各客户端推荐列表,点击名字可以直达 安卓客户端 Clashmeta Flclash bettbox nekobox flyclash clashmi karing WIN7指定客户端:clash party win7 PC电脑客户端 clash verge clash sparkle Flclash bettbox V2 MAC客户端 M核心 clash verge 小火箭(通过app store搜索下载,非大陆账号) Intel核心 clash verge 小火箭(通过app store搜索下载,非大陆账号) IOS客户端 NEXTIN KARING CLASHMI Shadowrocket 苹果客户端因为特殊性,所以需要自己找共享账号或者自行注册美区ID账号,前三个客户端免费,注册美区账号就能下载使用

7🔥1😁1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @chuixueyun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTCFinal Results224 voters

还需要优惠券吗?

  1. 需要优惠券,希望安排活动65%
  2. 暂时不需要优惠券38%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 249,964 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“吹雪云官方频道” (@chuixueyun), 1,525 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chuixueyun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.