#吹雪云 #vless #推荐 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★★★☆ 速度 ★★★☆☆ 延迟 ★★★☆☆ 性价比 ★★★★★ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀机场自介: 亚马逊优质线路阵容,节点资源强大,四网网络深度优化,移动 / 联通 / 电信/广电都能稳定畅连。采用高质量 Amazon 线路资源,热门地区节点覆盖,支持多场景使用。实力技术团队长期维护,稳定可靠!不记录日志,保护你的上网隐私。支持多平台客户端,iOS、Windows、Mac、安卓等设备均可使用。线路持续优化,晚高峰也能保持稳定体验。适配不同网络环境,减少卡顿、掉线和绕路问题。注册即送 7 天试用套餐,先体验再选择。 😀 链接导航 开业:2026.6 官网:点击进入 频道:https://t.me/chuixueyun 群组:https://t.me/chuixueyun_chat 套餐:https://t.me/ffqimages/225 2026年6月29日更新…

Channel
龙哥分享💋
@dragonfenxiang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001342107277 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dragonfenxiang |
| Description | 分享电影,音乐,收藏,结交朋友。 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dragonfenxiang |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 6 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 6 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.7%
- avg views ÷ 6 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 3 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (20 May 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 51
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 48
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
#良心云 #vless #hy2 #推荐 #低价直连 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★★☆☆ 速度 ★★★☆☆ 延迟 ★★★☆☆ 性价比 ★★★★★ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀 机场自介 流媒体解锁,无限速,高带宽,高性价比的一家直连机场! 😀 链接导航 开业:2025.3 官网:点击进入 频道:https://t.me/liangxin_yun 群组:https://t.me/liangxinyun_chat 套餐:https://t.me/ffqimages/90 2025.3.22更新 论坛:https://www.ffqla.net/thread-665-1-1.html 😀主观点评 我愿称之为真良心机场,6元1000G,速度优秀,1x倍率无套路,全直连,两块钱 这个质量还要啥自行车。推荐购买。仅代表个人观点!推荐标签仅代表本人实际使用后推荐,实际体验因人而异,建议试用或购买小流量套餐体验后再购买长期套餐。 😀翻翻墙…
#Crush Cloud #ss 📊 主观评分 稳定 ★★★★☆ 速度 ★★★★☆ 延迟 ★★☆☆☆ 性价比 ★★★★☆ (以上评分仅供参考) 😀 机场自介 4元每月 大碗高速 新疆可用 支持全流媒体/AI解锁 😀 链接导航 开业:2025.8 官网:点击进入 频道:https://t.me/CrushClouda 群组:https://t.me/CrushCloudi 套餐:https://t.me/ffqimages/142 2025年8月19日更新 论坛:https://www.ffqla.net/thread-773-1-1.html 😀主观点评 纯v6机场,购买时候请注意自身网络是否支持,联通体验极佳,便宜,4元150G。仅代表个人观点! 😀翻翻墙提醒您 任何机场都有跑路可能,建议仅月付,以降低风险。(本消息不针对任何机场)
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @dragonfenxiang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“龙哥分享💋” (@dragonfenxiang), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dragonfenxiang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.