网站升级已完成 现在您的订阅不会被新订阅覆盖,多个订阅会并列显示。 以解决续费必损失流量,或必须完全用完再续费的二选一难题

Channel
魔戒-按量计费机场
@The_Lord_Rings
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66,754subscribers
+869 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001257965944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_Lord_Rings |
| Description | 加入我们,随我们探索中土世界! 最新消息、优惠推送,建议关注 地址: 魔戒.com |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_Lord_Rings |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 66,754 | +196 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 66,558 | +118 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 66,440 | +63 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 66,377 | +109 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 66,268 | +78 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 66,190 | +79 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 66,111 | +49 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 66,062 | +90 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 65,972 | +87 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 65,885 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 7 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.8%
- avg views ÷ 66,754 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13,300
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (7 February 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 54
- Links
- 39
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
【网站系统升级维护】 我们稍后将对网站进行一次升级,此次升级会造成短暂的网站无法访问。 您的节点和连接不会受影响,仍可继续使用,不会中断。 影响访问仅限网站访问、网站登录、更新订阅。
【安全更新通知】请尽快修改账号密码 我们近期接到 V2Board / Xboard 系列面板的安全更新通报 "找回密码" 接口存在一处验证缺陷,理论上攻击者在提前知晓用户邮箱的情况下,可能触发异常密码重置。 目前魔戒安全补丁已部署完成,漏洞已封堵。 如果您的邮箱不曾暴露,这次漏洞对您的影响有限。此次影响主要是AFF推广用户。如果您同时在多个站点拥有相同邮箱的账户,为了您的账号安全,我们建议您(定期修改密码是个很好的习惯,如果您方便,建议您安排时间也进行修改密码): 1. 立即修改账号密码,使用此前未使用过的强密码。并重置订阅 2. 检查近 7 天的订单、订阅、提现记录 是否存在异常 3. AFF 推广用户 请额外检查佣金余额和近期工单 4. 如发现任何异常,请第一时间通过工单联系客服 期间AFF推广用户如果被盗用提现请尽快联系我们,我们会核实,如果损失属实,损失由我们承担。 我们已升级了密码重置接口的校验逻辑,并…
套餐价格调整通知 非常感谢各位朋友长期以来的支持与信任。 我们对于价格调整和方案调整一向保持克制。 但是由于网络环境持续恶化,以及线路成本持续上涨。 我们计划于 2026年5月1日 对套餐价格进行调整。 —————————— 流量 价格 单价 130G ¥19.9(≈0.153/G) 420G ¥52 (≈0.124/G) 750G ¥85 (≈0.113/G) 1660G ¥179 (≈0.108/G) 3600G ¥330 (≈0.092/G) 10T ¥888 (≈0.087/G) —————————— 所有套餐仍为 按量计费,不限时间。 · 已购套餐不受影响,剩余流量照常使用 · 调整前仍可按当前价格购买/续费 · 同套餐续费会直接覆盖,升级套餐可自动折抵旧套餐 感谢大家的理解与支持
Channel photo updated
USDT资产持有警示 我们的USDT收款地址被Tether 冻结,此前USDT也曾出现多次冻结情况,但均出现在大额资金且配合司法行动。我们的被冻结的钱包用于魔戒收款,均属正常资金来源。且金额较小 如您的资产在USDT持有占比较高,建议谨慎评估风险。 此条消息仅作为风险警示,不提供任何建议。
请使用官方APP 有报告称 某第三方telegram客户端存在 私自回传使用者手机号码 以及用户名的操作 建议大家使用官方APP 官网 https://telegram.org/apps Telegram 官方没有中文工作人员 如果有 "官方"私信你 用中文的 请直接拉黑 官方也不会主动私聊任何人 你的账号有问题 他会直接禁止私聊 或者封禁 不存在 提醒 警告 这一说
警惕钓鱼信息 我们不会主动联系您要求提供任何信息,主动私聊您的99%都是诈骗,请谨慎辨别! 向您发送不明链接的,提供高薪工作的,告知您账户有风险的类似信息,极高的概率为诈骗。 Telegram官方更不会以中文向您发送任何信息 祝愿各位小伙伴远离诈骗
各位新年快乐!
魔戒 春节活动开启 2026/2/14 00:00 到 2026/2/27 23:59 购买 138元及以上套餐 赠送 25%八戒余额 138=34.5 279=69.75 688=172 购买套餐后 发送工单 标题 春节活动 内容 1 后台会为您创建八戒账号赠送对应余额 魔戒账号 [email protected] 则八戒账号 [email protected] 密码也是 [email protected] 同时八戒开启优惠活动 建议先买魔戒套餐 然后用赠送的余额购买八戒套餐 记得用八戒优惠码噢 祝大家马年一切顺利 开心快乐
中国移动国际出口方向拥堵,导致延迟升高和丢包率增加。可能与NCP 海缆计划维护有关。 我们已监控到带宽下降和丢包率上升,如有新的进度我们会及时更新。八戒使用的专线网络不受此波动影响。 对于造成的体验降级我们深表歉意
魔戒5周年活动进度 已登记用户 已全部发放完毕 请使用账号登录八戒官网查看 余额在购买套餐时会自动使用 八戒官网 https://bajie.la 示例 魔戒账号 [email protected] 则 八戒账号 [email protected] 八戒密码 [email protected] 购买流程和魔戒一致如有疑问可以发送工单咨询 或者咨询网站左下角人工客服 或者咨询TG客服 @tianchongplusbot
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @The_Lord_Rings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 521,425 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“魔戒-按量计费机场” (@The_Lord_Rings), 66,754 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Lord_Rings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.