Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 机场测速/推荐/观察

Channel

机场测速/推荐/观察

@duang_speedtest

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,807subscribers

+3,172 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296468941
TypeChannel
Username@duang_speedtest
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/duang_speedtest

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

29,63532,80731,2217 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net +3,172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,159–33,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:4732,807+15
8 Nov 2026, 23:4732,792+33
7 Nov 2026, 13:1732,759+51
6 Nov 2026, 12:3132,708+18
5 Nov 2026, 13:1632,690+43
4 Nov 2026, 13:4632,647+34
3 Nov 2026, 16:1532,613+13
2 Nov 2026, 18:5632,600+50
1 Nov 2026, 21:0932,550+35
31 Oct 2026, 20:4032,515+42
30 Oct 2026, 21:3032,473+46
29 Oct 2026, 19:3132,427+78
28 Oct 2026, 15:4632,349+41
27 Oct 2026, 13:0632,308+12
26 Oct 2026, 16:3832,296+31
25 Oct 2026, 13:1032,265+28
24 Oct 2026, 13:0932,237+15
23 Oct 2026, 15:4632,222+16
22 Oct 2026, 17:0732,206+34
21 Oct 2026, 12:4832,172first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 2 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 32,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,780
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held81 (2 November 2023 – 9 November 2026)
Views total80,860
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 20:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,030
Videos
≈2
Links
≈1,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 48s
Average length
2m 48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (26.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 03:10 UTC≈3,280 viewsread 11 November 2026

这显卡越来越有意思了 【AMD首席执行官苏姿丰(Lisa Su)在2026年11月发布的第三季度财报后再次重申,AMD是一家“数据中心优先(Data Center First)”的公司】

7 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC≈4,450 viewsread 11 November 2026

#机场优惠 ⚠️ 推荐所有机场月付 ⚠️ #花云 官网:flowercloud.net 双十一特惠【2IVUB20HMW】 2026年11月1日0:00-11月30日23:59 全场 8 折,不包括Air/企业套餐 #良心云 官网:良心云.com 优惠码:双十一LXY 有效期:11.6日至11.13日23:59 注意事项: #赔钱机场 赔钱机场.com 优惠码:1111 折扣程度:7折 截止时间:2026年11月15日23点59分 #m78星云 官网:m78.at 优惠码:season85 halfyear82 year80 有效期:2026年11月16日 注意事项: #Ueolynetwork 全场 8.5 折 优惠码:DE1111 活动时间: 2026/11/05 0:00 – 2026/11/11 23:59 (CST) #咕嘎云 优惠码:2026DOUBLE11 【除 Basic 基础套餐外…

5 Nov 2026, 01:30 UTC≈6,380 viewsread 11 November 2026

现在机场圈的情况大家都懂,入口说封就封,线路说调整就调整,今天测速好看,明天还能不能用都不好说。这也是最近不怎么测速的原因。 笔者本月已经自费花了 200 +,陆续观察了不下 10 家机场,结果发现大家的情况都差不多,这也从侧面反映出当前机场圈的大环境。 所以,购买前先看看用户群和各大交流群的近期反馈,重点关注在线率、线路稳定性及售后响应情况,谨慎选择,理性上车。 最后再次提醒,月付!月付!月付!月付!月付! ⚠️ 推荐所有机场月付 PS:狗妈机场目前也不稳定,点名vk,估计已经失联了吧。

29 Oct 2026, 07:36 UTC≈9,490 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#PingNetwork #专线 #Vless #ANYTLS 官网:https://pingnetwork.org 频道:@ping_network_official 群组:@ping_network_official_group 某直连大佬开的二站,走低调极简风,走了个面儿要了个订阅测测。 官网重构了一下变好看了,复测了一下,入口应该是大厂云手搓GTM和三网优化入口之间来回切,不知道是什么机制,但是测速情况看来还不错。 清一色的Bage落地,IP不算脏,上能用AI,下能跑测速。 总的来说推荐购买,当主力当备用都不错。 活动: 🎁 全场套餐限时加赠! 🔥 年付套餐: 额外赠送 3 个月,共 15 个月! 🔥 两年付套餐: 额外赠送 6 个月,共 30 个月! 🚀 不限时套餐: 额外赠送 25% 流量!

26 Oct 2026, 10:34 UTC≈8,860 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#投稿 #樱花云 #中转 #直连 #Vmess 跳转官网 频道 群组 前置接入 Amazon、阿里云、DMIT 等主流云厂商机房网络中转。通过多入口与海外落地机池的弹性交叉调度,实现极强的抗阻断与抗封锁能力,优惠码:66F88,打折后7.9元50G起 机场导航 | 近期打折机场 ⚠️ 推荐所有机场月付

22 Oct 2026, 01:42 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 11 November 2026

生产环境的小伙伴,还是尽早更新吧。有点离谱。 本次涉及:PHP、Node.js、Nginx(含 njs)、Go、Rust 生态及 LiteLLM 、Chrome

21 Oct 2026, 09:29 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#非宣传 #AshNet 点击跳转购买 依旧广告系列,电信用真的是卡爆,其他运营商可以看看,打折之后推荐备用。 机场导航 | 近期打折机场 ⚠️ 推荐所有机场月付

20 Oct 2026, 08:29 UTC≈8,780 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#非宣传 点击跳转购买 自费购入,整体体验还算凑合,部分运营商测速直接显示为 0,具体原因暂时未知,不过实际可以使用。 全场75折优惠券,打完折12/100G 机场导航 | 近期打折机场 ⚠️ 推荐所有机场月付

20 Oct 2026, 07:53 UTC≈4,660 viewsread 29 October 2026
Photo

#投稿 #nowhere #专线 #Vless 官网:https://dashboard.nowhere.best 频道:@nowherenet_channel 群组:@nowherenet_group 最近一直在深度使用,老板听劝换了Vless,给我的主观感受就是QOS变低了,更好用了。 老板响应挺快的,几次问他udp配置问题,都秒回。 自选接入点的功能除了官方说的根据运营商选择外,我的个人用法是,一个v6接入跑大流量下载和看EMBY,一个精品入口刷TG和用AI,一个神秘大陆接入点打fps,完美覆盖日常用途。 缺点就是偶尔不太稳定,但是不到两块钱一个月...我自适应一下。 省流:质量远超同价位机场,如果不是超高要求玩家,日常用用,推荐购买

19 Oct 2026, 10:33 UTC≈4,620 viewsread 29 October 2026
Photo

#Vikinglinks #BGP #直连 #Trojan 点击跳转购买 频道 群组 只有高级套餐才值得买!太贵了,钱包可能受不了。落地采用 Sakura 与 Gomami 线路【高级套餐才有】 整体配置放在当前环境下依然属于第一梯队。线路稳定性和高峰期表现都比较有保障。 省流:如果更看重线路质量、稳定性以及长期使用体验,而非单纯追求低价大流量,那么这类偏精品线路定位的机场依然值得考虑。 机场导航 | 近期打折机场 ⚠️ 推荐所有机场月付

19 Oct 2026, 10:33 UTC≈3,090 viewsread 26 October 2026
Photo

#投稿 #迷途猫 #Vless 跳转官网 频道 群组 高速网络节点,网上冲浪,ChatGPT,流媒体解锁,Tiktok运营养号,跨境电商,家宽专线直播,均毫无压力! 普遍支持可选北美、欧洲、东南亚、日韩、中东、南美等各地区。 全中转专线节点3.8元/月起,支持3设备同时在线,Tiktok运营养号,跨境电商。 机场导航 | 近期打折机场 ⚠️ 推荐所有机场月付

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @duang_speedtest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@duang_speedtest edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @duang_speedtest as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Duyao|SpeedTest|科技生活|资讯转发
@DuyaoSS · 67,215
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 20 August 2026
翻翻墙 | 机场评测
@ffqchannel · 69,031
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 22 August 2026
前女友们用过的机场—始于机场,不止机场
@gebaopiCloud · 101,557
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 August 2026
一个朋友 | 免费机场 VPN 推荐
@ygpy_net · 44,459
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 29 August 2026
FlClash Channel
@FlClash · 54,302
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 August 2026
Clash Verge Rev Channel
@clash_verge_re · 86,158
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“机场测速/推荐/观察” (@duang_speedtest), 32,807 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duang_speedtest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.