#厚道云 #测速 #直连机场 #送测 #简短测评 ✈️ ▎机场信息 🍓官网: 厚道云官网 ✈️频道: @hdy866 ✈️群组: @houdaoyun 🗓开业时间:2026.9 🐷 ▎主观评分 稳定性 ★★☆☆☆ 速度 ★☆☆☆☆ 性价比 ★★☆☆☆ ⚠️ 以上评分为主包的主观评分,仅供参考 🚀 ▎测速节点 佛山联通2G、深圳电信2G、上海移动1G ✈️ ▎机场类型 - 直连 - 节点类型:Vless + Hy2 🌟 ▎ 个人评价 挺新的一家全直连机场,价格也确实不贵一元百G系列 - 价格&倍率方面: 最低套餐 4元/500G/月。0.5 - 1 - 2 倍 - 速度方面: 全直连节点 全直连节点,还有不少V6的,速度就一般了,不过也符合这个价位的速度 联通和移动 还能跑跑,电信就真不行了 是 DigitalOcean,是 Akamai,是AWS — 这把集…

Channel
推个鸡场|优质小而美机场推荐
@PushGoodCloud
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,703subscribers
+2,399 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001978366667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PushGoodCloud |
| Description | ▎一个十八线的机场测评频道 ——致力于小而美机场推荐 为你客观的阐述所推荐机场的情况,多方位综合可选 ▎这是频道相关群组喔: @OowoO_Chat ▎送测在看这里 https://t.me/TyboePM/6 ▎这都2026了.ᐟ.ᐟ ᯅ̈ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PushGoodCloud |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 08:17 | 13,703 | +37 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 19:49 | 13,666 | +60 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:08 | 13,606 | +57 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:08 | 13,549 | +52 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:55 | 13,497 | +72 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:48 | 13,425 | +21 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:41 | 13,404 | +26 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:58 | 13,378 | +20 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 13,358 | +9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 13,349 | +31 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 13,318 | +38 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 13,280 | +39 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 13,241 | +11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 13,230 | +15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 13,215 | +25 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 13,190 | +21 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:18 | 13,169 | +18 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 13,151 | +20 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 13,131 | +23 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:26 | 13,108 | first reading |
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.3%
- avg views ÷ 13,703 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,540
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.524%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 29,300 |
| Reactions total | 150 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 19:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈85
- Videos
- ≈2
- Links
- ≈318
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
393 reactions across 36 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 20.4% | |
| 🤡 | 74 | 18.8% | |
| 👎 | 40 | 10.2% | |
| 🤓 | 40 | 10.2% | |
| 🤮 | 34 | 8.65% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 5.34% | |
| 💩 | 21 | 5.34% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 3.82% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 3.05% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 3.05% | |
| 🌭 | 11 | 2.80% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 1.27% | |
| 😡 | 5 | 1.27% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 1.02% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.763% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.763% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.509% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.509% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.509% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.509% | |
| 5 further kinds | 5 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 40 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PushGoodCloud. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 5.00%
- 2 of 40 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 1,490
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 1,860
- over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (36.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🌟 ▎工具分享 - 查IP网站 🥹 写在前面: 我的好厚米们,你到底一天要把pixx0打开多少次,天天查查查,没事就逮到你那b纯净度天天看,你没事吧🫵💩 好吧,现在呢,立马把P开头的贵站(我没说你晚上爱看的那个黄黑配色的)移出你的收藏夹,顺便再把历史记录清一下,防止下次一不下心手贱输入回车可以立马进入的偶发事件发生,thanks 🌟 超好用IP相关查询网站 🟠 ip.skk.moe 🔗直达链接: ip.skk.moe 功能(简略描述):本机IP/网站分流/多出口IP/DNS出口 🟠 ip.net.coffee 🔗直达链接: ip.net.coffee 功能(简略描述):IP查询/AI检测/IP评分/网络连通/DNS泄露 🟠 ipx.al (品云出品) 🔗直达链接: ipx.al 功能(简略描述):IP查询/AI检测/IP评分/网络连通/DNS泄露 🟠 群友分享 😙 ippure.com cleanip.io i…
❤2
#NovoNET #测速 #中转机场 #直连机场 #送测 #简短测评 ✈️ ▎机场信息 🍓官网: NovoNET官网 ✈️频道: @NovoNET_NOC ✈️群组: @NovoNET_Chat 🗓开业时间:2026.4 🐷 ▎主观评分 稳定性 ★☆☆☆☆ 速度 ★★☆☆☆ 性价比 ★★☆☆☆ ⚠️ 以上评分为主包的主观评分,仅供参考 🚀 ▎测速节点 佛山联通2G、深圳电信2G、上海移动1G ✈️ ▎机场类型 - 中转[海外入口] + 直连 - 节点类型:AnyTLS + Vless 🌟 ▎ 个人评价 一家10元百G的小而美机场捏 ↔️ - 价格&倍率方面: 最低套餐 2.8元/20G/月。全1倍节点 - 速度方面: 全直连节点 近晚高峰测的捏,联通和移动单线程倒是还可以,电信就差了点意思了 稳定性就一般了 - 总体挺一般的,测出来结果也符合价格预期 - 有很小…
👎6❤1🌚1
🌟 ▎2026 · 机场双十一优惠汇总 多了不说,少了不唠。321上优惠 好吧,虽迟但到,主包其实在狠狠收集活动然后准备一块发的,所以迟了点(其实主要是懒得一个个来来回回改了🥹) ⚠️ 温馨提示: 1、机场出优惠是机场出优惠的,出的再花,主包还是希望你月付 2、点击蓝色字体可进入机场官网 3、所有优惠码点按可复制 ———————————————— 🟠赔钱机场 7折 优惠码: 1111 有效期:截止到11月15日23点59分 🟠花云 8折 优惠码: 2IVUB20HMW (Air/企业套餐 不可用) 有效期:截止到11月30日23:59 🟠良心云 75折 优惠码: 双十一LXY 有效期:截止到11.13日23:59 🟠阿拉丁 半年付 9折 优惠码:SemiAnnually 年付 8折 优惠码:Annually 有效期:常驻 🟠Ueolynetwork 85折 优惠码: DE1111 有效期:2026/11/11 2…
❤4
#频道互推 #群组推荐 频道藏馆 影视软件 电视 TVBox 全能搜书·福利书库 Naruto 频道推荐 折腾IOS内测|限免频道 山茶花の机场频道|免费机场推荐 一览 资源分享 优质-破解软件-分享基地 知识分享官 电报频道索引 互推:@miaomiao333bot
❤1
#Ronancat #测速 #直连机场 #送测 #简短测评 ✈️ ▎机场信息 🍓官网: Ronancat官网 ✈️频道: @ronancat_official ✈️群组: @ronancat_chat 🗓开业时间:2026.10 🐷 ▎主观评分 稳定性 ★★★☆☆ 速度 ★★★☆☆ 性价比 ★★★☆☆ ⚠️ 以上评分为主包的主观评分,仅供参考 🚀 ▎测速节点 佛山联通2G、深圳电信2G、长春移动1G ✈️ ▎机场类型 - 直连 - 节点类型:Vless + Tuic 🌟 ▎ 个人评价 一家全直连的小而美机场捏 👀 主包也是跟机场主唠了几天,机场主也是从机场主彻底变成了机场主 有一说一,确实很负责,售后也很好。真真从基层上来的 🥹 - 价格&倍率方面: 最低套餐 6.6元/100G/月。几乎全1倍节点,少部分0.05和0.3的 - 速度方面: 全直连节点 近晚高峰测的捏…
❤6👎3🥰1
本来呢 这只是一个简单的送测 看他家频道发布的内容 主包就开始质疑机场性质 送测给拒了 质疑他家机场频道里那条置顶的性质 也不解释 问就是 我这边太智障了 不配他老板给我解释说明下我问的这个内容 合着送测问都不能问了😅 然后就开始骂了🥲 截图私聊送测的 #RanCloud
❤9👏4🤣2🤔1
#频道推荐 #互推 ● 独特吧-破解软件游戏资源分享 ● 推个鸡场|优质小而美机场推荐 ● 蜻蜓资源-破解软件VPN ● Naruto 频道推荐 👍👍👍 ● 某咕咕的 机场 & VPN 测评站 ● 短剧合集 每日分享 ● Fang的资源分享群 参加互推: @pindaohutui123bot
#Ueolynetwork #测速 #中转机场 #送测 #简短测评 ✈️ ▎机场信息 🍓官网: Ueolynetwork官网 ✈️频道: @UeolyNetworkChannel ✈️群组: @UeolyNetworkGroup 🗓开业时间:2026.6 🐷 ▎主观评分 稳定性 ★★★☆☆ 速度 ★★★☆☆ 性价比 ★★★☆☆ ⚠️ 以上评分为主包的主观评分,仅供参考 🚀 ▎测速节点 佛山联通2G、深圳电信2G、上海移动1G ✈️ ▎机场类型 - 中转[海外+国内入口] - 节点类型:Vless 🌟 ▎ 个人评价 很早之前就送测过的机场,之前叫 Becky Network,现在改名了,也只是改了个名字 第一把送测的时候,主包觉得太新了,就没测,这转眼也运营快半年了,也是狠狠测了👀 - 价格&倍率方面: 最低套餐 9元/100G/月,常规节点1倍,专线2倍 - 速度方面: …
❤4👎1
文案主包一号就写好了 其实是预制的 忘了发了x🤡🤲 反正频友也不睡觉 就天天盯着主包频道 smjb消息都转发到自己收藏夹是吧 你就盯着没事看吧 小群又开始蛐蛐了是吧🤡🫶🤡
🤡9☃1🌚1
不是 这不是十一月了嘛 这马上机场又要搞双十一活动了 双十一搞完 可能还有个双十二 双十二哪怕不搞 还有个圣诞元旦 往后还有个春节 欸哟喂 👀 我看频友准备好被圈了么x 还是那句话 有优惠也月付季付 年付你还是悠着点吧 太喜欢某机场钱太多 那就随便你了😅 #圈钱时间到 #狠狠搞活动
🤡4
测评是不测的 跑个测速图来来回回就那几句x 赚钱是赚不到的 指望这个 早饿死了 瘾是纯大的🥹 你别问 建频道的初衷就是相互折磨 主包花一大堆时间写出来一大堆废话 你又花一小部分时间看主包写出来的一大堆废话 看似你赚了 实则全亏了 🌟
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @PushGoodCloud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@PushGoodCloud edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 21 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @PushGoodCloud as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 15 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@OowoO_Chat · 1,50218 posts频道索引&推荐
@recommend3 · 107,0343 posts比特冲刺 | 通知频道
@dashbitTel · 4811 post[①群]比特冲刺DASHBIT Chat
@dashbitWWW · 9351 postDoriya Network
@DoriyaNet · 2,4741 postDoriyaNet Discuss
@DoriyaNetDiscuss · 2,1881 postdorocloud
@dorocloud · 5451 post翻翻墙 | 机场评测
@ffqchannel · 69,0311 post月之暗面-THE WALL
@floyd_thewall · 7051 post厚道云(招代理)
@houdaoyun · 1,1341 postnvenix云机场交流群
@jjfm664 · 3,0371 post良心云
@liangxin_yun · 13,0321 post良心云(诚招AFF)
@liangxinyun_chat · 8,8571 post牛来机场官方通知
@niulaitz · 361 postRe:NovoNET Chat
@NovoNET_Chat · 1491 postNovoNET NOC
@NovoNET_NOC · 601 postnvenix云机场通知频道
@nvenix · 6601 postQi 【启】频道
@qijsqyes · 9181 postRonanCat官方通知频道
@ronancat_official · 3071 post小众机场测评
@sstrojan · 24,2051 post阶跃云&Stepfly Cloud
@stepfly1337_cloud · 4451 postUeolyNetworkCannel
@UeolyNetworkChannel · 2121 post影子吹水群
@yingziniub · 2,3621 post影子传话筒
@yingziyyds · 1,4241 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cheapairport_channel · 26,358
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 15 September 2026
@cheap_proxy · 26,294
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 September 2026
@freeVPNjd · 23,983
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 19 September 2026
@ffqchannel · 69,031
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 22 August 2026
@wxgqlfx · 34,229
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 5 September 2026
@chongshengvpn · 69,411
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 20 August 2026
@DuyaoSS · 67,215
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 20 August 2026
@jichangtj · 135,732
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“推个鸡场|优质小而美机场推荐” (@PushGoodCloud), 13,703 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PushGoodCloud.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.