Channel
@USPolTech
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001280672783 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @USPolTech |
| Description | https://www.uspoltech.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/USPolTech |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 50 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 50 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
К большому сожалению, сейчас совсем не подходящее время и место для исследования американских политических технологий. Надеюсь, что канал USPolTech будет регулярно обновляться вновь когда изучение американской полики станет востребованным. Пока что спешу поделиться своей статьёй про выборы 2020 года, которая была написана уже давно, но опубликована в 6 номере 2022 года журнала Мировая экономика и международные отнош…
Что может помешать демократам удержать нижнюю палату? - изменение количества челнов ПП по итогам переписи населения - редистриктинг - заявление некоторых действующих членов о том, что они не планируют переизбираться.
Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger censured at RNC National Committee meeting From Tyler Boyer (RNC National Committeeman): The resolution to censure Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger passes with support of almost every corner of the GOP at the RNC meeting from what I could tell. Everyone seems to agree that Liz and Adam shouldn’t be calling themselves Republicans taking orders from Democrats. No one at RNC can remember a…
https://www.courier-journal.com/story/opinion/2022/01/26/rand-paul-how-we-prevent-war-ukraine-opinion/9226398002/?fbclid=IwAR1_6v-eNxNw66aEfqPf9cuZXAytZorJz9-QDlynV0FtNYvWYgnMButA6nM
Любопытный рейтинг самых больших радетелей за Украину в Конгрессе США. https://www.axios.com/congress-ukraine-russia-social-media-mention-468bff47-ce36-42c5-9448-86ee27553ced.html
Провернуть джерримендеринг «по тихому» не получается. В Огайо планы республиканцев по изменению границ избирательных округов были нарушены решением суда. Проблема не только в том, что Огайо будет голосовать по старым границам, но и в том, что к попыткам республиканцев теперь будет привлечено внимание повсюду.
https://twitter.com/todd_spence/status/1480256216618049537?s=21
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/587105-eleven-interesting-races-to-watch-in-2022?userid=136567
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/01/01/congress-future-presidential-ballots-trump-challenge-526168
Photo, posted without a caption
Кстати, о печатных АПМ в США. Есть такой портал, где выложены отсканированные печатные материалы кампаний 2016 и 2020 годов. Кому интересно, можно рассмотреть поближе, поискать общие паттерны по построению текста, риторических приёмов. Праймериз Демпартии 2016 Праймериз Республиканцев 2016 Креативы в таргет 2016 Выборы 2020 Демпартии Выборы 2020 Республиканцы
Раскрыта одна из основных политических интриг года - будет ли Мэтью Макконехи баллотироваться в губернаторы Техаса
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @USPolTech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“USPolTech” (@USPolTech), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USPolTech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.