Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Не медийный Давид

Channel

Не медийный Давид

@telegadavidaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,585subscribers

-251 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001966703875
TypeChannel
Username@telegadavidaa
Created17 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held67
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/telegadavidaa

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,28110,94910,61510,5856 August 202614 November 2026
67 measurements spanning 100 days, net -251. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,181–11,049 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 08:5910,585-17
11 Nov 2026, 11:1710,602-55
9 Nov 2026, 17:1510,657-15
8 Nov 2026, 07:0510,672-9
7 Nov 2026, 04:4010,681-14
6 Nov 2026, 07:0510,695-22
5 Nov 2026, 06:2810,717+3
4 Nov 2026, 02:1510,714-45
3 Nov 2026, 04:4710,759-75
2 Nov 2026, 07:0610,834-115
1 Nov 2026, 09:0710,949+49
31 Oct 2026, 08:2010,900+141
30 Oct 2026, 08:3010,759+38
29 Oct 2026, 10:2110,721+2
28 Oct 2026, 06:3010,719+38
27 Oct 2026, 07:5610,681+7
26 Oct 2026, 05:0010,674+6
25 Oct 2026, 07:1610,668-20
24 Oct 2026, 07:1810,688+21
23 Oct 2026, 04:3710,667first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 10,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held58 (19 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total33,280
Reactions total895
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 22:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,281 reactions across 56 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥95618.1%
❤88016.7%
🔥86416.4%
👍66212.5%
😁60911.5%
🏆3476.57%
🤔1532.90%
🤣1372.59%
💔931.76%
🌚741.40%
🐳701.33%
👎470.89%
🥰470.89%
🎉320.606%
👏290.549%
✍260.492%
😱260.492%
😭240.454%
😍230.436%
🤝150.284%
31 further kinds1673.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 58 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @telegadavidaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,060 views40 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Почему если я вдохновился видосом другого человека, то я украл его идею,плагиат и мол сам ничего не могу придумать, а если еще 100 человек украли, то это уже не воровство, а тренд?🤔

😁33❤3👍2🤔2

8 Nov 2026, 18:40 UTC≈2,400 views49 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

202 этажа 😖 Есть кто тоже балуется таким тренажером? Сколько ваш рекорд? Норм рекорд у меня? 👍🏻/👎🏻?

👍36❤11👎2

31 Oct 2026, 11:55 UTC≈3,780 views93 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Пост добра! Заезжаю на мойку и вижу маленького парнишку, который с интересом рассматривает мою машину и показывает на неё маме. Думаю, мило) Заехал в бокс, смотрю — он хочет подойти поближе, а мама не пускает. Я говорю: «Чего, понравилась? Хочешь, покажу?» Он такой: «Ма, мона? 🥺» Мама разрешила, он радостный подбегает, смотрит на машину, а у него в руке игрушечная машинка, точь-в-точь как моя, я был в шоке) И ту…

❤‍🔥68👍8🥰8❤5🕊1🤗1🤩1😢1

26 Oct 2026, 22:53 UTC≈3,270 views149 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Харррри Кейн взял золотой мяч! Какие мысли? Заслуженно? Да - 👍🏼 / Нет - 👎🏼

👍125👎18❤2👏2🌚1🤗1

26 Oct 2026, 18:08 UTC≈3,170 views43 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤27❤‍🔥9🔥3😁3💋1

26 Oct 2026, 18:07 UTC≈2,080 views42 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Те самые 10 подруг невесты и 10 друзей жениха ❤️‍🔥 Это какой-то отдельный вайб! Невероятный коннект с первой встречи. Честно сказать, я даже не мог подумать, что такое возможно. Мы общаемся в беседе 24/7, как настоящая семья. Кстати, нашу беседу так и назвали — «Семейный чат» 😁 Теперь каждое утро я просыпаюсь и читаю по 200–300 сообщений в чате. Это самое крутое , что у меня появились новые братья и сестрички ❤️ Ст…

❤33🔥4😍3❤‍🔥1🙏1

26 Oct 2026, 15:44 UTC≈2,090 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Свадьба моего близкого друга) Лучший день за последнее время ❤️‍🔥 Всё началось с мальчишника, организацией которого занимались я и ещё две легенды — Серж и Алекс 😁 Жених сказал, что это был один из лучших дней в его жизни, лучше хвалы не придумать) А дальше началось то, что останется в памяти навсегда. Первый день свадьбы — просто космос)))! Колонной машин поехали за невестой, потом в церковь, а после — в ресторан …

❤38🔥8🥰5😍1

26 Oct 2026, 10:29 UTC≈2,200 views47 reactionsread 13 November 2026

А, ой, Реал выиграл да? Извините, на свадьбе был, не смотрел матч, ну ладно, в этот раз без ваших слез обойдемся 😁

😁36🥱6❤4👏1

25 Oct 2026, 18:29 UTC≈2,380 views80 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Сливочные готовы плакать сегодня?

😁49❤12🥴7🤣3🤬3⚡2🥱2🕊1

25 Oct 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,560 views36 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😁28❤7🌭1

25 Oct 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,490 views34 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Все, что нужно знать о мне сейчас:

😁29❤5

24 Oct 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,590 views58 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍35😁13🥰5❤4😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @telegadavidaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@telegadavidaa edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Спиряков
@spiryakov · 40,614
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
ФК БАНКА
@fcbench · 29,239
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Mavrin Coach / Василий Маврин
@mavrinlive · 23,039
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Федос
@Fedos911 · 32,299
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Влажный Футбол
@vlazny1football · 40,621
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
ШУГАР | Медиафутбол
@sugarfifa · 38,545
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
АМКАЛ
@amkalfc · 96,489
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
PROKOP🕷
@proProkopa · 55,152
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Герман Эль Классико
@elclassicoBand · 80,403
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Ай джаст ванна Фил
@ijustwannaphil · 18,552
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 October 2026
СБОРНАЯ МЕДИАФУТБОЛА РОССИИ
@osipovnikolayofficial · 25,162
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
JOGEL
@jogel_official · 20,722
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
ДИСС НА ВСЕХ
@sibskanahater · 27,770
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
ERIKSON
@wonderful_liar · 19,250
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
Дмитрий Егоров | Едим спорт | Президент Броуков
@edimsp · 56,089
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Крысева 🐀 | Медиа футбич
@KrysMF23 · 135,152
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
ФК 10 || ФК Десять || FC 10
@fc10fc10 · 25,533
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
НЕКЛАСИКО
@neclasic0 · 96,933
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
Матч! Медиафутбол
@match_media · 36,477
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
WINLINE Media League
@WinlineML · 84,601
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
PARI
@bc_pari · 99,968
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Крысиный Эдем 🐀 | forzorezor (он же forz9r)
@forz9rr · 47,012
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
13TEAM | Медиафутбол
@team1341 · 48,094
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Не медийный Давид” (@telegadavidaa), 10,585 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telegadavidaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.