Looks like the MSM is stirring up fear over the “Ebola-like Lassa virus” in Iowa. But if you dig deeper, the "risk of transmission" is "incredibly low," deaths are rare, and most people with the “virus” show zero symptoms. In fact, WHO says 8 in 10 have no symptoms at all. 🤷♂️ In other words, the "Lassa virus," like all "viruses," fails Koch's first Postulate since healthy people are being fraudulently tagged with …

Channel
Debunking Germ Theory
@OpposedtoVaccines
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
554subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001599387913 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OpposedtoVaccines |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OpposedtoVaccines |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 554 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 555 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 555 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 9 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 35.6% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 25.4% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 15.3% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2024 to 29 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
A great visual explanation for why a "viral isolate" is not an "isolated virus" for those who may still be confused. https://viroliegy.com/category/purification-isolation/
🔥6💯3❤1
In the world of virology, there are many blockbuster “viruses” that serve the deadly Pharmaceutical Empire and friends. Everyone is familiar with the Spanish Flu, measles, and relative new “virus” on the block ‘SARS-CoV-2’ first appearing in Once Upon A Time in Wuhan. However, is there now another contender?… The establishment claim that the ‘West Nile virus’ (WNV) was discovered in Uganda in 1937 through an interes…
👍2
A CALL FOR THE TRUTH A White Paper On The Viral-AIDS Hypothesis By Robert Willner The history of medicine contains a plethora of instances in which physicians have acted tragically under "consensus of opinion" rather than relying on substantial scientific evidence. This practice has its origins in the long-held concept that medicine is an "art" rather than a science. In recent decades, the major advances in technolog…
👍4❤1
https://viroliegy.com/2022/08/08/rabies-the-virus-of-fear/
❤1
Sharing a little common sense for today.
💯8❤1👎1
Shh! Don't Mention SV40 SV40 or "simian virus 40" is an entity that has often stirred up excitement in both the medical establishment and the freedom community. There is also an A-list antivaxxer who has claimed that it presents a fatal inconsistency in the 'no virus' position. In this video we expose the truth about the origins of SV40 last century and why it is such an important concept for all of those who ignore…
❤2👍1
The first “virus” Stefan started with was HIV. After studying the publications of the HIV discoverers and their followers, he realized that they did not contain a single piece of evidence for the existence of the virus. He then studied the publications on all other viruses and clearly saw that instead of finding and isolating the virus from a sample of a sick patient, virologists put the patient's sample (e.g. blood)…
👍5❤4🔥2👏1
A spirochete bacteria is NOT the cause of Lyme Disease, end of discussion. What you have here is a toxic Tick Bite which leads to a purposely Nonspecific and fluid diagnosis that will inevitably lead you to take courses of antibiotics including: Doxycycline, Amoxicillin, and Cefuroxime, all of which are extremely toxic and completely ineffective and will lead to chronic issues. What you have here is many diseases bei…
👍3🔥1
100 Failed Contagion Studies of a bunch of different diseases! (There's more but 100 is enough for now 😁)
❤11🤷♂1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @OpposedtoVaccines. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,265,511 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Debunking Germ Theory” (@OpposedtoVaccines), 554 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OpposedtoVaccines.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.