2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 333–335 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 07:34
334
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:02
334
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
148.1%
avg views ÷ 334 subscribers
Avg views / post
495
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
16 (1 November 2025 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
1,484
Reactions total
59
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
202 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
64
31.7%
❤
45
22.3%
👍
33
16.3%
💯
32
15.8%
⚡
4
1.98%
👏
4
1.98%
🤣
4
1.98%
👌
3
1.49%
😈
3
1.49%
🙏
3
1.49%
👎
2
0.99%
🤯
2
0.99%
👀
1
0.495%
🤨
1
0.495%
🤬
1
0.495%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎥 Our latest video:
"𝗠𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗥𝗲𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻: 𝗝𝗮𝗯𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗚𝗲𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲, 𝗧𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶, 𝗦𝗵𝘂𝗯𝘇 - 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗻 𝗘𝗻𝗱𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲."
💥 This 8-minute video breaks down what Jabber George, Brian Tamaki, and Shubz don't want exposed - the funding, the loyalties... and the cracks in the story they're selling you.
Cancelled from the Data Centre Leaders Summit - What exactly are they protecting?
To the FuturePlace Events Team and the organisers of the Data Centre Leaders Summit New Zealand,
I received your email advising that, “following a review of registrations and our event security protocols,” you have cancelled my registration and will not permit me to attend. You state this is because the event has implemented “enhanced…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hH338qxh96E
Liz says there's no missing money.
📄 There is.
She says Kelvyn wasn't inner circle.
📄 He was.
She says he didn't write the policies.
📄 He did.
She says his bankruptcies were bad money management.
📄 They weren't.
And that's just the start. The receipts destroy every claim she's made.
Settle in. This one's a ride. 🍿
Rights aren't granted - they're defended or lost.
Example: If you must apply for a firearms licence to exercise self-defence or gather food, you've already surrendered your rights for a revocable privilege. No one can truly give you rights; anything they can grant, they can extinguish just as easily. Unless you defend what you claim as rights with extreme prejudice against all who seek to take them, you have none. G…
To counter the constant propaganda against Iran by Western media and others, who are ultimately owned and controlled by the 'forever victims', we suggest reading the following books.
Remember, many of you know how governments and media worked hand-in-glove to push the narratives they wanted you to believe and the posions they wanted you to take. The same is happening now with the campaign against Iran - the same aga…
Israel's propaganda budget for 2026: US$730 million.
🤯
Truth is free. $730 million is what it costs to make a lie 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮 true.
📹 I made a video. (10 minutes.)
💸 Let's follow the money.
#zionismIsEvil #deepstateagendas #pariahmedia #plasticchristians
So many people are pushing zionist propaganda talking points in an effort to demonize Iran 🇮🇷 without knowing anything about the backstory. The following explains this very well - [Language Warning ⚠️ alert]
Zionism is a cancer upon the earth.
#pariahmedia #zionismIsEvil #deepstateagendas #IranVsIsrael
Watch here:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/186MP49r3i/
I was told my newborn needed a vitamin K injection to avoid brain damage or even death. I refused. 🚫🧠
In this video, I reveal why — and what every parent should know before agreeing to this intervention.
🎥 Watch the full video HERE
❤10👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pariahmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,010,979 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pariah Media” (@pariahmedia), 334 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pariahmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.