Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Grant Wickham

@GrantWickham

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

593subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001184174995
TypeChannel
Username@GrantWickham
DescriptionSeeking truth- no more lies! . Crypto-bitcoin groups will be deleted on sight.
Created7 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/GrantWickham

Growth

5937 Aug 2026, 00:33 — 593 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:47 — 593 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:337 Aug 2026, 00:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 592–594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 00:47593no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:33593first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.70%
avg views ÷ 593 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.8
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total529
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,800
Videos
6,270
Links
19,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1553.6%
👍1139.3%
😢27.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

“At the end of 2020, the public was sold a story of scientific triumph. The FDA had authorised the first Covid vaccines, television networks broadcast healthcare workers rolling up their sleeves, and public health officials urged millions to get vaccinated with assurances that the shots offered the path back to normal life. But inside Dr Anthony Fauci’s private diary, a starkly different reality was already taking sh

1

Signed Grant Wickham

2 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC22 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Horror in the sky: Greece helicopters collide while fighting fires 🔥.

2😢2

Signed Grant Wickham

1 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC26 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ABridgenVideo

What do they say ‘if you have nothing to fear you have nothing to hide” but the NZ Government are refusing to show their NZ vaccine date to the court. It’s for disclosing this data that Barry Young is on trial. He claims he is a whistleblower and the data shows clusters of deaths after vaccination. How can he have a fair trail of the data is not shown to the court ? https://t.me/ABridgen

Signed Grant Wickham

1 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

The sentient machine World is targeting and killing Human intelligence, the 5G Electromagnetic ⚡💥 microwave radiation ☢️ Directed Energy Alien 👽 Laser Weapon system cell death ☠️ towers are self aware like robots.

Signed Grant Wickham

1 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @drsambaileyofficialPhoto

🧐 What if five common medical words don't mean what you've been led to believe? In this latest video, I explore the history and changing meanings of five familiar terms—and why understanding language is key to questioning modern medical narratives. ▶️ Watch now

Signed Grant Wickham

1 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @drsambaileyofficialPhoto

The Biggest LIES About Cholesterol In this new video, Dr Sam Bailey examines the cholesterol narrative, statins, and the evidence behind one of medicine's most enduring beliefs. 🎥 Watch now HERE

1

Signed Grant Wickham

1 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/69TvKALy-Io?si=XF-Emg5nsFWxjNR6

1

Signed Grant Wickham

30 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“The Welsh Parliament passed a ground-breaking law on March 17, 2026, making it illegal for candidates to make false or misleading statements of fact during Senedd election campaigns. The legislation establishes a new criminal offence to target deliberate deception, alongside a recall system allowing constituents to remove misbehaving politicians.” BBC. https://business.senedd.wales/documents/s156034/A%20Model%20for

1👍1

Signed Grant Wickham

30 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC121 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/toms-guest-appearances/the-kim-iversen-show

1👍1

Signed Grant Wickham

30 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC24 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

So now it’s partially coming out, weapons of mass destruction, a bio-weapon for depopulation. Yet y’all hiding away when someone sneezes or has the flu. There was no C19 virus it was a full on psyop to get those jabs in people’s arms. Wait till you find out Virology is pseudo-science, your head is going to catch fire. You can’t catch a cold. It’s your body detoxing. https://t.me/GrantWickham

1👍1

Signed Grant Wickham

30 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/breaking-guilt-ridden-anthony-fauci?r=1tqe1i&utm_medium=ios

1👍1

Signed Grant Wickham

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GrantWickham. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Grant Wickham” (@GrantWickham), 593 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GrantWickham.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.