Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FNQ Citizens Collective

@FNQCitizensCollective

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

265subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001422194914
TypeChannel
Username@FNQCitizensCollective
DescriptionFNQ Citizen's Collective is an apolitical support and information community. We promote lawful means to resist tyranny. Website: https://fnqldcc.com Video Channel: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/fnqcitizenscollective
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/FNQCitizensCollective

Growth

2657 Aug 2026, 01:35 — 265 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:48 — 265 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:357 Aug 2026, 01:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 264–266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:48265no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:35265first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 December 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,400
Videos
516
Links
2,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

12 Feb 2023, 21:34 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 7 August 2026

Better start putting some pressure on your local politicians people, because all hell is about to break loose otherwise. Check the WEFs "predictions" for coming crises. They predict them so accurately because they are created by their member governments and corporations.

Signed Tracey

12 Feb 2023, 21:31 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCAKc7J1e9A

Signed Tracey

18 Dec 2022, 21:53 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Why can't people acknowledge we already have protection under human rights law? 🤔 Why is this constantly ignored by "leaders"? 🤷‍♀️ Something to think about, maybe. 🤨 https://t.me/ReclaimTheLine/953

Signed Tracey

15 Dec 2022, 22:02 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hmmmm, Musk dumping even more Tesla shares ....👀

Signed Tracey

15 Dec 2022, 21:12 UTC816 viewsread 7 August 2026

Yes. When something is astroturfed in both MSM and alt media be suspicious, there is always a motive. https://t.me/OracleFilms/1393

Signed Tracey

15 Dec 2022, 21:12 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @OracleFilms

Now we see why mainstream media in the West were promoting China's recent protests... "China is experiencing a wave of panic buying and stockpiling as residents prepare to face a winter wave of Covid amid a widespread relaxation of lockdown restrictions." "And there are fears the Chinese health system will quickly be overwhelmed by a winter wave of Covid, as alarming videos circulating on social media showed patien

Signed Tracey

15 Dec 2022, 21:05 UTC978 viewsread 7 August 2026

Exactly what we have been saying. 🤦🏼‍♀️ That is why you keep your actions lawful. Effective and lawful. If you personally have been affected you can take legal action. Contact us if your not sure how still. For your own safety, avoid people who can't see beyond violence. Who either because of immaturity, political naivity, or by design are playing right into the hands of the agenda. 🤨 Their way won't work anywa

Signed Tracey

15 Dec 2022, 01:14 UTC653 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

At the heart of the vast majority of Australian police is a desire to serve the community. Regardless of what we see unfold from recent events, the loss of life of any officer or community member is tragic. Many aspects of our lives are divisive and unnecessarily burdened with the complexities of western society. All these things aside.. the harsh enforcement of PHOs, the instances of police brutality and so on, be

Signed Tracey

15 Dec 2022, 00:31 UTC560 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @offguardian

COMMENT BTL TODAY... "...Those who continually want to think there is someone out there who will “save us” from the evil of one country or another, choosing whichever one seems to work for them as “the enemy,” refuse to see just how centrally orchestrated all of this is. I admit I did not make it through this entire article in one sitting and will have to go back and finish it later, but it does not surprise me one

Signed Tracey

13 Dec 2022, 21:54 UTC455 viewsread 7 August 2026

Anybody who has ever promoted violence against the police in their groups or allowed people to make provocative and inflammatory statements promoting violence toward the police; should be doing some very serious soul searching today. As do those who support that view. Did two young officers deserve to die in such a horrendous manner? Are you proud of your misguided and misdirected hate? 🤔 - Janey ❤️

Signed Tracey

13 Dec 2022, 21:33 UTC429 viewsread 7 August 2026

What kind of coward deletes your post, posts a convoluted diatribe as a response and then blocks you so you can't respond? 🤔 Someone who is afraid of alternative views, and a bit of a control freak? Maybe someone who has something to feel a bit guilty about? Someone absolutely dishonest for sure. 🤨 Be very careful who you are following and who you are providing your personal information to. - Janey ❤️

Signed Tracey

13 Dec 2022, 15:22 UTC416 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @jermwarfare

Here's my latest conversation with Peter Breggin on being sued by Robert Malone for $25 million. https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/peter-breggin-robert-malone

Signed Tracey

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FNQCitizensCollective. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FNQ Citizens Collective” (@FNQCitizensCollective), 265 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FNQCitizensCollective.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.