Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 22 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 6,909 comparable posts for this entry, running 24 January 2018 to 7 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
128 measurements spanning 97 days, net +351,649. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,670,965–3,128,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 128
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 06:59
3,075,361
+3,841
10 Nov 2026, 12:41
3,071,520
+4,165
9 Nov 2026, 16:16
3,067,355
+1,388
9 Nov 2026, 01:38
3,065,967
+5,151
8 Nov 2026, 07:00
3,060,816
-282
7 Nov 2026, 15:11
3,061,098
+693
7 Nov 2026, 03:16
3,060,405
+2,445
6 Nov 2026, 16:10
3,057,960
+715
6 Nov 2026, 03:09
3,057,245
+4,446
5 Nov 2026, 17:09
3,052,799
+1,815
5 Nov 2026, 02:09
3,050,984
+3,952
4 Nov 2026, 15:10
3,047,032
-765
4 Nov 2026, 04:19
3,047,797
+627
3 Nov 2026, 13:16
3,047,170
+1,101
3 Nov 2026, 03:40
3,046,069
+3,734
2 Nov 2026, 12:49
3,042,335
+1,107
2 Nov 2026, 04:51
3,041,228
+2,787
1 Nov 2026, 13:46
3,038,441
+904
1 Nov 2026, 07:30
3,037,537
+1,803
31 Oct 2026, 14:27
3,035,734
first reading
Engagement
10,990 posts held, back to 24 January 2018 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,642 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 3,075,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
494,000
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 10,990 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
10,990 (24 January 2018 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
4,450,000
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,900
Videos
≈2,480
Links
≈275
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
25m 36s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 9 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 9 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3 days of being posted; a typical post has already reached 25.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 59.1% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 96,900 views — 3.15% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 103,400).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
430
across the posts below
Posts paid on
41
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
124
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dosti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 June 2025 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
دادن احساس امنیت، دوس داشتنی بودن و خاص بودن از مهمترین مؤلفه های یه رابطه خوبه، شما باید به طرفتون نشون بدین با آدمای دیگه واسه شما متفاوته و چقدر بودنش کنارتون ارزشمنده.
join❥ @Dosti
امروز هفتم آبانماه؛ روز بزرگداشت کوروش بزرگه.
ما از سرزمین کوروشیم؛
سرزمینی که تاریخش با شمشیر نوشته نشد، بلکه با تمدن، اندیشه و نامهایی ماندگار شد که قرنها بعد هم فراموش نشدند.
کوروش فقط یک نام در تاریخ نیست؛ بخشی از هویت ما، نمادی از شکوه ایران و یادگاری از تمدنیست که نامش از مرزهای زمان گذشت و هنوز در حافظهی جهان زنده است.
ما به گذشتهمان میبالیم، به ریشههایمان افتخار میکنیم و به ایرانی بودنمان سربلندیم. …
قیمتها عجیب شده
بلیط هواپیما ۴۰ میلیون
پژو ۲۰۷ چهار میلیارد
شیر پروتین کاله ۲۰۰ هزار
قهوه ساده ۲۰۰ هزار
یعنی هر طرف نگاه میکنی با یک پنجم اون پول همین پارسال این موقع همون جنسو میخریدی
یک پنجم
پنج برابر شدن قیمتها شوخی نیست
این وسط میلیونها نفر له شدند رفت
join❥ @Dosti
« ما فاتَكَ لم يُخلق لكَ
وما خُلِقَ لكَ لن يفوتكَ. »
آنچه را از دست دادی برای تو آفریده نشده بود و آنچه برای تو آفریده شده است را هرگز از دست نخواهی داد.
join❥ @Dosti
مسئله پیدا کردن یار نیست،
یکی باید باشه که بشه همه چیو باهاش قسمت کنی،
باهاش رفاقت کنی،
دوسِش داشته باشی و وقتش که رسید خانوادت بشه..!
join❥ @Dosti
گاهی درِ اتاق باز است، اما آنقدر به بستهبودنش عادت کردهایم که جرئت عبور نداریم.
بسیاری از زندانها میله ندارند؛
از ترسهایی ساخته شدهاند که سالهاست به جای واقعیت، برایمان تصمیم میگیرند..
👤کافکا
join❥ @Dosti
عکسه یه جوریه انگار خود شاهین سلفی گرفته
join❥ @Dosti
Showing the 12 most recent of 10,990 posts we hold for @dosti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@dosti edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 October 2026
Most recent edit
10 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @dosti as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
4 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
9
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
9
vacant every time we have ever looked
@dosti named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hot_tube named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@gps_chat named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@zede_liinks named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@gporo named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@picehot named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@argovpnk named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tafahomibot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@todlil named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@hio9p named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
💯💓کانال بهترین ها💓💯 @ZARA_2 · 103,053 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 15 August 2026
AxProfile | عکس پروفایل @ax_proftel · 192,319 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
کانال تله طنز😂جوک💡دانستنی @MyTeleTanz · 636,608 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026
Teleboon 🅱️ تِـلـــه بـون @teleBoon · 509,562 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
• کافه تنهایی♡ @kafe_tanhaii20 · 62,083 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
آهنگ جدید | ایران موزیک @IranMusic94 · 2,032,830 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
|•😂 جعفر اباد 😂•| @Jafarabad85 · 98,035 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
اینستا نیوز |instanews @insta_newz · 92,551 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
AbarMusic - ابرموزیک @AbarMusic · 192,029 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
فاک @off_fuk · 177,360 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
مَگَس @Maagas · 710,435 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
دختر شعرگو 😅 @Dokhtar_shergo · 93,966 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رفاقت” (@dosti), 3,075,361 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dosti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
