Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💯💓کانال بهترین ها💓💯

Channel

💯💓کانال بهترین ها💓💯

@ZARA_2

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

103,090subscribers

-1,436 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001067411306
TypeChannel
Username@ZARA_2
Description‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌﷽ بهترینها برایه شما🎻 🌴بهترین فیلم ها آهنگ ها وعکس هاروز🌴 ارتباط👈 @bankg1 💌 ربات همه کاره👈 @cixbot ربات جدید👈 @ZARA_2BOT لینک پاک کن گروه👈 @Gorbot ربات ضدلینک هوشمند👈 @ixmbot #خروج_ازکانال
Created4 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZARA_2

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Aalijnab/55366611 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC@ZARA_2/137613 · this entry11 Oct 2026, 06:17 UTC0.9815 minutes
@Aalijnab/5526652 Oct 2026, 07:20 UTC@ZARA_2/137539 · this entry2 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC0.9813 minutes
@Aalijnab/55452918 Oct 2026, 20:54 UTC@ZARA_2/137664 · this entry19 Oct 2026, 06:53 UTC0.9710.0 hours
@Aalijnab/54711210 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC@ZARA_2/137199 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC0.975.6 hours
@Aalijnab/5535679 Oct 2026, 21:09 UTC@ZARA_2/137608 · this entry10 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC0.969.9 hours
@Aalijnab/55401214 Oct 2026, 05:56 UTC@ZARA_2/137638 · this entry14 Oct 2026, 06:08 UTC0.9411 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Aalijnab11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.958.7 hours@Aalijnab (11–0)
@keereker8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.935.0 hours@keereker (5–3)
@gilin_gilin7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.942.7 hours@gilin_gilin (6–1)
@kod857 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.962.0 hoursthis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 22 of the 22 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 220 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

103,090104,878103,9845 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,436. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102,822–105,146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 06:44103,090-17
8 Nov 2026, 21:58103,107-20
7 Nov 2026, 11:46103,127-18
6 Nov 2026, 09:54103,145-7
5 Nov 2026, 10:31103,152-28
4 Nov 2026, 09:49103,180-24
3 Nov 2026, 07:41103,204-16
2 Nov 2026, 07:28103,220-2
1 Nov 2026, 10:10103,222-7
31 Oct 2026, 08:18103,229+11
30 Oct 2026, 04:40103,218-23
29 Oct 2026, 02:49103,241-10
27 Oct 2026, 23:27103,251-6
26 Oct 2026, 19:36103,257-23
25 Oct 2026, 16:55103,280-28
24 Oct 2026, 14:38103,308-20
23 Oct 2026, 11:16103,328+7
22 Oct 2026, 14:19103,321-39
21 Oct 2026, 06:28103,360-40
20 Oct 2026, 06:46103,400first reading

Engagement

524 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.82%
avg views ÷ 103,090 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 524 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held524 (2 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total155,722
Reactions total1,714
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,000
Videos
≈20,800
Links
≈2,610

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 55m
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 283 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,788 reactions across 507 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,60036.8%
❤1,43214.6%
😁6246.38%
🤣5775.89%
🥰4955.06%
🤩4814.91%
👏4394.49%
🔥4324.41%
💯2852.91%
😍2792.85%
🙏2432.48%
🎉2222.27%
🤮1081.10%
🖕730.746%
😐700.715%
👎690.705%
😱660.674%
💩640.654%
🤬630.644%
💔400.409%
17 further kinds1261.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 524 of the 524 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 524 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 83 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈3,250 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🔴 صحبت‌های وايرال شده از خانمی که وسواس فکری شدید داره: من از سنگ توالت خیلی چندشم میشه؛ بعد همش فکر میکنم نکنه تبدیل به سنگ توالت بشم؟؟؟ بخاطر همین مُدام نفس میکشم که یادم بیاد من انسانم و سنگ دسشویی نیستم. تو طول روز مثلا یهو 9 ساعت پشت هم نفس می‌کشم که باورم بشه انسانم... @ZARA_2

😐15👍8😭4👏2😍2💯1

4 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈2,900 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔺پست جدید ترامپ پس از نتایج انتخابات: وتو!... @ZARA_2

👍8❤6🖕2🎉1💯1

4 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈2,460 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔺دموکرات‌ها سنا را فتح کردند 🔹دموکرات‌ها پیش از شمارش آرای تمام ایالت‌ها با کسب ۵۲ کرسی اکثریت سنا را به دست آوردند. شرط پیروزی در مجلس سنا کسب ۵۱ کرسی از مجموع ۱۰۰ کرسی است. @ZARA_2

👍10❤3🔥1🤩1🥰1

4 Nov 2026, 06:11 UTC≈2,220 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔴فوری 🔹دموکرات‌ها کنترل هر دو مجلس نمایندگان و سنای آمریکا را به دست گرفتند. آخرین وضعیت شمارش آرای انتخابات کنگرهٔ آمریکا 🔹مجلس نمایندگان جمهوری‌خواهان: ۱۰۶ کرسی دموکرات‌ها: ۱۹۱ کرسی 🔹مجلس سنا جمهوری‌خواهان: ۴۰ کرسی دموکرات‌ها: ۴۹ کرسی @ZARA_2

👍9❤4🥰2👏1💯1😍1

4 Nov 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,900 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

صبحتون بخیر و شادی🍁 @ZARA_2

👍6❤4🥰2💯1🔥1🤩1

3 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,330 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

اولش میخواست بفروشه ولی وجدانش نزاشت😂 @ZARA_2

👍7😁4🥰2🔥1😍1🙏1

3 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,070 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🔴 امروز از ساعت ۱۳:۳۰ به وقت ایران انتخابات میان دوره ای آمریکا شروع میشه و تا ساعت ۷:۳۰ صبح چهارشنبه ادامه دارد. @ZARA_2

👍8❤2👏2🔥2🤡1🤩1

3 Nov 2026, 06:13 UTC≈2,040 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔴 سناتور کریس مورفی که از طرح حمله ترامپ به ایران پرده برداری کرده بود، شب‌گذشته به دلایل کاملا نامعلومی سکته کرد😐😂 @ZARA_2

👍10😱3❤2💯2🤩2🎉1

3 Nov 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,800 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

حساب رسمی نیروهای تفنگدار دریایی ایالات متحده در شبکه X: "آماده اعزام". @ZARA_2

👍9👎2❤1🔥1🤩1🥰1

3 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,730 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

حالا زبان انگلیسی بلد نبودی عکس سوسکم ندیدی!؟😂 @ZARA_2

👍8❤3🙏2👏1🥰1😍1

3 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,590 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

وقتی یه دانشجوی درسخون سینگلی 😂 @ZARA_2

👍7❤5🎉1💯1🔥1😁1

3 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,740 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026

فاکس نیوز به نقل از یک مقام آمریکایی: حمله به جزیره قشم در پاسخ به سرنگونی یک پهپاد آمریکایی توسط ایران انجام شد. / انتخاب @ZARA_2

👍8😍2❤1🎉1🥰1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 524 posts we hold for @ZARA_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

رفاقت
@dosti · 3,075,361
#1
کانال تله طنز😂جوک💡دانستنی
@MyTeleTanz · 636,608
#2
آهنگ جدید | ایران موزیک
@IranMusic94 · 2,032,830
#3
حوادث واقعی و اخبار روز ایران و جهان
@KELIPENAB20 · 1,976
#4
• کافه تنهایی♡
@kafe_tanhaii20 · 62,083
#5
اینستا نیوز |instanews
@insta_newz · 92,551
#6
|•😂 جعفر اباد 😂•|
@Jafarabad85 · 98,035
#7
💠ܥ‌‌ܠܝ̇ߺوܢܚ݅ࡅ߳ܣ◉ܩیܫߊ‌ܥ‌‌💠
@Miead1371 · 326
#8
🎼دل،آهنگ🎼
@delnveshteh_99 · 1,603
#9
👈💘ڪـلـبـه عـشـق❤ 👉
@iloyey · 1,078
#10
رمان خوانی
@romaan_khoni · 4,963
#11
اهنگ های معروف اینستا،بیسدار،ترکیه ای، سیستمی،آذری،‌گنگ،ترکی،بیت،بی کلام،کانال،اینستا،عربی،اینگیلیسی،تیک تاک،هیپ هاپ،خفن،گنگ
@muzik_instaw · 1,695
#12
دختر شعرگو 😅
@Dokhtar_shergo · 94,039
#13
🇮‌🇷‌🇦‌🇳‌🇮‌🇦‌🇳‌
@akhbar_roz · 89,449
#14
فاک
@off_fuk · 177,360
#15
Teleboon 🅱️ تِـلـــه بـون
@teleBoon · 509,562
#16
کوییز 🦋 . 🦋 تابش 🦋
@Smartchallenges · 414
#17
👑 reғιgн ғaв cнᴀɴɴᴇʟ 👑
@refiiighfab · 174
#18
آکادمی نگرش
@negaresh_academy1 · 215 (as read 15 August 2026)
#19
Airdrop_tap
@Airdrop_season_with_Ali · 73
#20
آموزش روش‌های درآمد دلاری
@DolarSazBig · 36,363
#21
🇦🇿Ana vətn Azərbaycan🇦🇿
@Ana_Vatn_Azarbaycanm · 607 (as read 15 August 2026)
#22
🎶كانال موزیک کاوند🎶
@kavandzn · 695 (as read 15 August 2026)
#23
Shh!📸
@pleaseshhhh · 582 (as read 15 August 2026)
#24
AxProfile | عکس پروفایل
@ax_proftel · 192,319
#25
کرتیل آبادمن
@kartilabadman · 552
#26
ویگن🎸 ( سلطان جاز ایران )🖤
@vigensinger · 947 (as read 15 August 2026)
#27
"کلام برتر"دوره اول
@kalamebartartabriz · 1,713
#28
معرفی ربات استخراج ارز 💰💰💰
@robatarzidigetal · 205
#29
پایش نظام مهندسی آذربایجان شرقی
@azarnezam_news · 492
#30
هیرکان خبر
@hirkankhabar · 1,756
#31
‌ کانال اخبار جید
@jeyyedvillage · 1,014
#32
مبینا پادیر 🚀
@mobinapadiir · 551
#33
پیش بینی زلزله
@Quake2025 · 52,733
#34
ملانصرالدین
@mollanasreddeen · 4
#35
Hozan Dino - هوزان دینو
@OzanDino · 6,058
#36
راديو جوان
@musicnaderi89 · 2,111
#37
ONE
@oneonee · 2,318
#38
THE ONE VPN 1
@vpn_one1 · 1,087
#39
Alaedin VPN 🧞‍♂ علاءالدین
@AlaedinVPN · 153,131
#40
Perspolis
@Perspolis024 · 4,090
#41
🎵| 🥀 خوی موزیک 🎵| 🥀
@Khoymozic · 174 (as read 15 August 2026)
#42
𝗫𝗜𝗔𝗢𝗠𝗜 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗟 ( کانال کانفیگ رایگان)
@XiaomiMobileTips · 1,733
#43
آرشیو همه ترانه‌های بانو هایده
@HayedehArchive · 1,693
#44
سَبع المَثانی
@hou786 · 3,982
#45
تیم دوچرخه سواری توسکا
@TooskaCyclingTeam · 830
#46
مجموعه نت های موسیقی 🎹
@allsaznote · 1,929
#47
کانال ثبت نام آموزشگاه منتظمی
@sabtenam66492773 · 1,269
#48
Modern Men's Studies
@mmstudies · 1,214
#49
VPNtori
@vpntorich · 142
#50
The WILDS будни создателей путешествий
@theWILDS · 280
#51
انبار کانفیگ
@Testkadeh3 · 1,082
#52

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

• کافه تنهایی♡
@kafe_tanhaii20 · 62,083
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
AxProfile | عکس پروفایل
@ax_proftel · 192,319
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💯💓کانال بهترین ها💓💯” (@ZARA_2), 103,090 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZARA_2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.