#凤凰卫视:妙瓦底诈骗园区卷土重来 新据点不断出现 9月28日,凤凰卫视援引缅甸媒体报道,缅甸妙瓦底地区网络诈骗活动再次出现扩张迹象。 位于妙瓦底附近的水沟谷,过去曾多次遭到清剿并拆除部分诈骗园区,但今年初开始,当地又有新的园区陆续建设,部分已经投入使用,并通过社交平台公开招募人员。 除了水沟谷外,妙瓦底市区部分区域和山区也出现新的诈骗据点,部分此前停止运作的园区重新恢复活动。有缅甸议员表示,当局需要加强对地方行政部门的监督,推动各省邦持续打击网络诈骗活动。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8

Channel
东南亚新闻|缅北|金三角
@xigang1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,485subscribers
-13,436 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002088585480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xigang1 |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #缅甸#泰国 #菲律宾 #新闻 #曝光 东南亚新闻频道专注于东南亚华人最新新闻资讯,生活故事分享,关注我们每天都有好心情。 爆料投稿联系:@jpz8i8 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xigang1 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 49,485 | -3,540 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 53,025 | -1,403 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 54,428 | -1,389 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 55,817 | -1,328 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 57,145 | -1,532 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 58,677 | +17,976 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 40,701 | -2,172 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 42,873 | -1,563 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 44,436 | -2,903 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:23 | 47,339 | -689 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 48,028 | -687 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 48,715 | -593 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 49,308 | -860 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 50,168 | -715 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 50,883 | -444 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 51,327 | -264 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 51,591 | -392 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 51,983 | -428 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 52,411 | -789 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 53,200 | first reading |
Engagement
815 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.17%
- avg views ÷ 49,485 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,070
- 432 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 432
- of 815 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 815 (10 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 463,700 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 17:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈30,800
- Videos
- ≈5,730
- Links
- ≈16,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 26m
- Average length
- 54s
Measured directly from 231 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🇻🇳 2名越南蛇头组织偷渡致人死亡被判刑 今天,越南同塔省法院作出判决,以“组织他人非法出境罪”分别判处吴黄清9年监禁、阮红海8年监禁。 去年11月24日,警方在胡志明市-中良-美顺高速公路发现一名马来西亚籍男子遗体。经查,被告受雇将入境越南的外籍人员经安江省偷渡至柬埔寨网诈园区。案发当日,该马籍男子在被转运途中因情绪失控跳车身亡。 此外,两人还曾多次组织偷渡并牟取暴利。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
ZachXBT爆料:Bitget被朝鲜黑客盗的钱,中国洗钱团队正在用Discord 服务器和 Telegram 频道售卖。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
#巴基斯坦资讯:卡拉奇PECHS两处呼叫中心被查,79人被列入两份FIR 9月28日,据巴基斯坦媒体Dawn报道,巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局(NCCIA)近日对卡拉奇PECHS Block 6两处呼叫中心展开突袭行动,两处场所据称由同一组织运营。行动中有70多人被捕,警方随后登记两份FIR,共点名79名涉案人员,其中一案48人、另一案31人。 据NCCIA调查,两处呼叫中心设在住宅区域,工作人员涉嫌以美国正规金融机构工作人员的身份联系美国民众,以办理新信用卡、低息金融服务等名义获取受害者信息。 调查显示,涉案人员涉嫌获取包括美国社会安全号码(SSN)、手机号码、出生日期以及银行账户、银行卡和信用卡资料在内的敏感信息,随后通过呼叫中心内部服务器上的CRM系统交给运营方,再由相关合作商户进行未经授权的扣款。 此次行动中,NCCIA查获了一套正在运行的CRM客户管理系统,以及电脑、客户数据库和其他数字设备。执法部门认为,这些…
#泰国资讯:涉嫌糖业诈骗上亿泰铢!中国籍逃犯藏匿泰国芭堤雅豪华公寓落网 9 月 27 日,泰国警方联合移民局调查组开展抓捕行动,在芭堤雅一处豪华公寓内,抓获一名被中国通缉的中国籍涉案高管。 该男子是两家国内贸易公司负责人,早在 2015 年就已被中方发起指控。2023 年 3 月到 2024 年 1 月,他对外签订白糖销售合同,却根本没有对应货源,也不具备供货能力。受害者按照合同支付超 2000 万人民币,折合约 1 亿泰铢的货款之后,迟迟等不到约定货物。 经查实,这笔被骗钱款被嫌疑人拿来偿还债务以及挥霍个人开销。作案得手后,他直接卷款逃往泰国,躲进芭堤雅的高档公寓企图逃避追责。 泰国执法部门联合出击将其当场抓获,目前嫌疑人已移交移民局拘留所,后续将依法遣返回中国,接受法律审判。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:h…
#国内资讯:山东枣庄28人被抓,查获个人信息4000余万条 近日,山东枣庄警方在“净网—2026”专项行动中,侦破一起侵犯公民个人信息案,打掉犯罪团伙2个,抓获涉案人员28名,查获被非法获取、倒卖的公民个人信息4000余万条,初步查明涉案金额600余万元。 警方调查发现,马某某长期通过非法渠道购买大量公民个人信息,并用于贷款业务电话推销。随后,其组织多人非法获取、整理、倒卖个人信息,形成“获取—整理—分销—变现”的黑色产业链。 目前,28名涉案人员已被抓获,案件正在进一步办理中。警方提醒,广大群众应提高个人信息保护意识,谨防身份证号、手机号、银行卡号等敏感信息泄露。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️全球直登 ⚡️BBIN 联合迪威娱乐城 联手打造优质娱乐平台! ⚡️新会员首存赠送100%彩金(仅限ABA和加密货币充值,只能玩电子游艺) ⚡️支持 微信 支付宝 银行卡 充值 ⚡️支持 USDT ABA 充值 ⚡️支持 波币 NO钱包 购宝 多种钱包 充值 ⚡️24小时存取不打烊 ⚡️充值提现实时到账 🧂⚽️🏀🏈⚾️🥎🎾🏐 ⚡️官方频道: @diwei4 ⚡️官方客服: @diwei2 ⚡️官方代理:@diwei3 ⚡️官方网址: diwei.app ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
严防强迫卖淫!金边警方走访15处娱乐场所 金边警方近日对隆边区15处餐厅、KTV、按摩桑拿店等娱乐场所展开走访,重点宣传反人口贩运和打击性剥削相关法律,并要求经营者严防强迫卖淫等违法行为。 警方提醒,娱乐场所经营者必须加强内部管理,防范劳动剥削、强迫女性提供性服务等行为,不得让经营场所成为人口贩运、性剥削等违法犯罪活动的滋生地。 行动期间,警方还向各场所负责人发放相关法律资料,要求经营者提高法律意识,如发现人口贩运、性剥削等可疑情况,应及时配合有关部门处理。 警方表示,此次行动以普法宣传和预防犯罪为主,旨在加强娱乐场所经营者对相关法律的了解,从源头防范相关违法犯罪行为。 相关场所负责人表示,将配合警方要求,加强内部管理。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿…
bitget已经恢复比特币提币 第一波能抗住问题就不大了 需要提币的可以兑换比特币直接提币了 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
墨西哥警方解救两名遭骗招绑架中国籍男子,一名嫌犯落网,主谋在逃! 墨西哥媒体报道:两名中国男子被犯罪团伙以厨师岗位的虚假招工邀约诱骗,从尼加拉瓜前往墨西哥,入境后随即遭到绑架。 绑匪胁迫二人联系国内家属索要赎金,受害者抓住语言不通的机会,向中国驻墨西哥领事馆发送求救信息。领事馆收到求助后,把线索移交普埃布拉州检察院。 9月14日,普埃布拉州检察院收到求救线索。当地绑架勒索专项调查部门完成研判,于9月18日组织突击营救,警方锁定瓦尔斯基略公路附近一处房屋后发起突袭,成功解救两名被绳索捆绑遭绑架的中国男子,当场抓获一名负责看守人质的绑匪“爱德华多”,查获一支16号霰弹枪及配套弹药。 9月19日,普埃布拉州法官对爱德华多启动司法程序,裁定对其实施审前羁押,案件移交联邦司法机关继续审理。 警方调查显示,被捕男子仅为团伙底层看守人员,该案主犯仍在逃,联邦执法部门正追捕其余涉案人员。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入…
Bitget黑客开始转移赃款,通过THORChain将ETH换成BTC 9月28日,据Lookonchain监测,盗取Bitget约3.516亿美元资产的黑客,正在通过跨链协议THORChain将ETH兑换成BTC。 此类跨链兑换会增加资金追踪与冻结难度,相关地址及资金流向仍在持续监控中。 币还没追回,黑客已经开始跨链洗钱了,真正的追踪大战才刚开始。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
西港中国公民涉交通事故后,叫来多人殴打记者并砸毁手机 昨晚,柬埔寨西哈努克市发生一起交通事故,一名中国公民骑摩托车时发生碰撞,导致一名年轻男子重伤。 事发后,记者赶到现场进行采访。据现场消息称,涉事中国公民随后叫来四五名朋友,对到场采访的记者进行殴打,并将记者的手机砸毁。 目前,事件具体经过及伤者情况仍有待进一步确认,相关方面是否已介入调查暂不清楚。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
Showing the 12 most recent of 815 posts we hold for @xigang1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 467,845#1
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,661#2
@jpz_888 · 12,661#3
@xigang6 · 4,902#4
@BG_BG8 · 38,746#5
@flwph66 · 168,355#6
@xigangz · 89,934#7
@cctv_dy · 36,686#8
@BG576 · 376,817#9
@uae918 · 87,186#10
@dnydxw · 71,142#11
@heicaibaog · 82,368 (as read 24 August 2026)#12
@nnccqq · 38,432#13
@tghuarenba · 44,364#14
@Gaosl · 1,095#15
@AQzx_3 · 93,113#16
@bg99599 · 91,225 (as read 24 August 2026)#17
@BG423 · 33,478#18
@aa144 · 35,225#19
@feixingzhe0 · 58,575#20
@AQzx_1 · 175,586#21
@kz692nn · 139,774#22
@xigangB6 · 2,729#23
@zhaopinqiuzhi580 · 31,761#24
@xigang13 · 63,166#25
@Kolebule8119 · 3,816#26
@BD365YYZZ · 1,460#27
@baoguangba088 · 236,958#28
@bbb1b · 348,524#29
@tx100 · 158,539#30
@ZYWX6 · 101,169#31
@dnyblcg · 1,528#32
@tg89aa · 137,688#33
@bodu08 · 58,821#34
@dnybgtt · 53,637#35
@sii76 · 200,375#36
@kk4568 · 126,337#37
@baoguang85 · 31,656#38
@AnWei08 · 52,278#39
@xigang8688 · 10,991#40
@AQzx_2 · 80,997#41
@ton689 · 48,189#42
@mv111 · 52,194#43
@qqt13 · 203,311#44
@cn789 · 20,355#45
@JCSVIPA3 · 658#46
@dubaixinwen2 · 221,985#47
@baiyi · 416#48
@CYqichechuxing888 · 1,252#49
@ctv8cambodia · 687#50
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dashijianx · 224,937
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 11 August 2026
@dnydxw · 71,142
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@AQzx_3 · 93,113
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@baoguangba0 · 155,609
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@xigangz · 89,934
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 15 August 2026
@AQzx_1 · 175,586
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚新闻|缅北|金三角” (@xigang1), 49,485 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xigang1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.