В сентябре 2026 года на полках русскоязычных книжных появилась книга «Leningrad-89», выпущенная издательством «Носорог» — не то чтобы роман, не совсем документ, скорее экспериментальный травелог, написанный четырьмя американскими поэтами — Роном Силлиманом, Лин Хеджинян, Майклом Дэвидсоном и Барреттом Уоттеном. Поэт и переводчик Владимир Кошелев беседует с одним из авторов, поэтом языковой школы Барретом Уоттеном о к…

Channel
XAOSMOS
@dima_cabre
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
6,366subscribers
+162 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001377106626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dima_cabre |
| Created | 6 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dima_cabre |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 19:21 | 6,366 | +3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:20 | 6,363 | +9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:40 | 6,354 | +36 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 6,318 | +23 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:29 | 6,295 | +15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 6,280 | +4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 6,276 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 6,275 | +2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 6,273 | -5 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 6,278 | +10 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 6,268 | -2 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 6,270 | +20 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 6,250 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 6,246 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 6,247 | +24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 6,223 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 6,228 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 6,220 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 6,218 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 6,217 | first reading |
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.2%
- avg views ÷ 6,366 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,930
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (14 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 26,952 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://ges-2.org/the-bottomless-bag Еще один показ-презентация, на этот раз в ГЭС-2. Показываем «Мешок без дна» Рустама Хамдамова, ярчайший пример отечественного постмодернизма, а презентуем, само собой, «Линии ускользания: Введение в философию постмодерна». Встретимся 15-го ноября. (С регистрацией, кстати, советую поторопиться.)
Публикуем эссе историка искусства Анны Гарбузовской о том, как в теориях поколений, эйджизме и культурах этих поколений, а также в работах немецкого художника Ансельма Кифера, прослеживается свойственный современности конфликт между замалчиванием неудобного прошлого и манифестацией неопределенного будущего. https://spectate.ru/garbuzovskaya-regime/ «Если думать, что историческая память и национальное достоинство го…
Что всегда поражает в Триере, так это его наглость: на первый взгляд невероятно простая и прямолинейная, на второй — хитрая и богатая. Он насыщает свои фильмы самим собой, рискуя каждый из них превратить то ли в автопортрет, то ли в автокомментарий. И «Дом, который построил Джек» кажется комментарием к той скандальной пресс-конференции в Каннах, где режиссер, ухмыляясь, вроде как посочувствовал фюреру. «Джек» изобилу…
Смотрите на ютубе запись нашего с Максом Неаполитанским милого разговора про великое истребление метанарративов и представляйте себя маленьким растерянным Нассимом Талебом, застрявшим где-то между сикс севен и сикс эйт с пухлым томиком Мишеля Фуко подмышкой. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaHHig0lwRs
Анастасия Алёхина — междисциплинарная художница и исследователь, сфера научных интересов которой лежит в робототехнике, разработке носимых устройств и постгуманистической философии. Анастасия Хаустова поговорила с художницей о специфике art and science, проблематиках тела и телесности и будущем искусства в эпоху искусственного интеллекта. https://spectate.ru/alekhina-science/ «Единственная константа состоит в том,…
Публикуем перевод статьи кинокритика Пьетро Бьянки о фильме «Киногид извращенца: Утопии» — третьей части кинотрилогии Славоя Жижека и Софи Файнс, которая собирает на себе сюжеты предшествующих частей «Киногида» и применяет их к нашим дням, сталкивающим нас, ни много ни мало, с концом света. https://spectate.ru/next-year-zizek/ «Но если апокалипсис уже здесь, то эмпирическая реальность сама по себе не позволит нам е…
Давно не виделись? 7-го ноября в Третьяковке пройдет уже почти традиционный кинопоказ-презентация. Показываем «Дом, который построил Джек» Ларса фон Триера (да-да). Презентуем «Линии ускользания: Введение в философию постмодерна» (кстати, они уже вышли). До встречи! https://www.tretyakovgallery.ru/cinema/o/the-house-that-jack-built/
пришло время закидывать синюю
27 октября историк философии Дмитрий Хаустов прочитает лекцию «Феноменология кино: Гуссерль, Хайдеггер, Мерло-Понти» Феноменологический подход к кинематографу получил широкое распространение во второй половине ХХ века в связи с обращением кинотеории к телесному и аффективному опыту восприятия фильма в противовес классическим теориям, делавшим акцент на картезианском и чисто оптическом противопоставлении субъекта-зри…
В галерее pop/off/art прошла выставка художника Владимира Потапова «Что не сбудется, то нам приснится», на которой были представлены работы в технике «плавления», где монументальные сюжеты начинают «нависать», доминировать над изображениями городской среды и интерьеров квартир. Искусствовед и куратор Илья Крончев-Иванов размышляет о живописной поверхности и доверии к изображению на примере работ Потапова из серии «Ве…
Ув. делезолюбы и им соочувствующие! 26 октября в 19:30 паркуйте свои машины желаний во «Все свободны» на паблик-ток «Мифы о постмодерне». За свободное скольжение между концептами в этот вечер отвечают философы Дмитрий Хаустов и Максимилиан Неаполитанский. Подают всё, что вы так любите: шизоаналитический гиперобъект, гипосубъектную ризому, номадический ассамбляж, трансверсальные трансцендентности и трасцендентальны…
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @dima_cabre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@bereuzadeleuza · 1913 postsSPECTATE
@spectate_ru · 4,8722 postsяна, купи хлеба
@breadforeveryone · 1,1071 postосцилляции и роения
@gavr_st · 3961 postкостин архив
@konstyped · 3941 postnot about art madame
@nickwrites · 971 postРадио Харман || ООО и все-все-все
@radio_harman · 1,0141 postradio.syg.ma
@radiosygma · 1,3341 postнепроходимое болото современности
@swampmod · 331 postbaubley
@tbaubley · 6951 postМы после всего // Us after all (ex-Не-текст)
@us_after_all_zine · 211 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@chekhovandcompany · 6,1841 postForbes Young
@forbes_young · 12,1991 postПодписные издания
@izdaniya · 53,1461 postЗаметки на полях / Мастерская Николая Алексеева
@marginal_notes_studio · 4701 postМузей РОСФОТО
@museumrosphoto · 3,4371 postносорог
@nosorogmagazine · 5,8201 postнесовременник
@nsvrmnk · 2,1821 postPENNLAB
@pennlab · 1,9661 postСтудия Сдвиг
@sdvigspace · 1,4291 postSOYAPRESS
@soyapress · 1,8211 postMSCA: образование в сфере современного искусства
@uuMSCA · 5,1301 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Philosophytoday · 19,760
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
@admarginem · 33,630
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
@knizhnye_podborki · 22,699
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
@gorky_media · 19,036
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…комментарии) == Примечания == {{примечания}} == Ссылки == * [https://t.me/dima_cabre Телеграм-канал XAOSMOS] * [https://vk.com/xxxaosmos Паблик с лекциями…”
read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XAOSMOS” (@dima_cabre), 6,366 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dima_cabre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.