Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for осцилляции и роения

Channel

осцилляции и роения

@gavr_st

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

387subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002359090517
TypeChannel
Username@gavr_st
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gavr_st

Growth

38338738515 August 2026 — 383 subscribers15 August 2026 — 383 subscribers24 August 2026 — 385 subscribers30 August 2026 — 387 subscribers15 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 382–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 15:38387+2
24 Aug 2026, 09:53385+2
15 Aug 2026, 16:15383no change
15 Aug 2026, 16:00383first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.0%
avg views ÷ 387 subscribers
Avg views / post
151
1 post measured
Reaction rate
28.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held13 (28 April 202610 August 2026)
Views total151
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

271 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12245.0%
👍4416.2%
🔥3713.7%
🥰238.49%
114.06%
🍾62.21%
👀62.21%
😍62.21%
👌41.48%
🫡41.48%
❤‍🔥31.11%
👏10.369%
👨‍💻10.369%
💅10.369%
🙏10.369%
🦄10.369%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC151 views43 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сегодня важный для меня день — на бельгийском лейбле Crossfade Sounds выходит дебютный мини-альбом моего музыкального проекта tanangla — "Postorphic". Ждал этого дня и говорю спасибо всем, кто мне помогал, поддерживал и вообще! Ох какое же большое вам спасибо! Шесть треков, шесть моих товарищей теперь отправляются в этот странный и прекрасный мир, искать любви, искать соприсутствия. Зонтично жанр миниальбома можно

22🔥11🍾6👍2👏1🥰1

27 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC287 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! 18 августа стартует мой микрокурс в МИФ. Буду рассказывать о самой сложной для рассказывания теме — как искать ИДЕИ для ваших историй. Курс — вот здесь — изучите программу и вэлкам, если откликнулось. 2 занятия всего! (вот так я нарушил все правила нативной рекламы, потому что основная часть поста — ниже) Помню время, когда я только-только начал что-то сочинять. Я поражался, как в книгах, фильмах и пр

👍15🥰108💅1

15 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC303 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @mlynchikbaturina

Благодаря этой беседе и роману Жени Чернышовой «Собака Вера», я открыла для себя авангардную писательницу и художницу Елену Гуро, начала читать крышесносные воспоминания Надежды Тэффи, узнала, как создаются тексты для детей. Еще я расспросила Женю об истории ее дебютного взрослого текста. Из повести на четыре авторских, который мы когда-то разбирали на Липках, он сделался толстой книгой, что не так давно вышла в «Аз

👍7❤‍🔥32👨‍💻1

15 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC289 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Женя Чернышова — пример отваги и трудолюбия. Ее "Собаку Веру" мы обсуждали на одном семинаре году, кажется, в 2019-м, еще в прошлой исторической эпохе. Чуть позже повесть вышла в журнале "Дружба", и вот, спустя время, спустя много лет (по нынешним-то меркам — год за два), Женя сделала несколько важных вещей, две из них моему сердцу особенно милы: 1. Она сама предложила текст издателю (не забыла, не положила его на по

👍7😍61🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC293 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сейчас буду предельно серьезным. Вопрос. Что такое хороший художественный текст? Как вы понимаете, что текст написан хорошо? Как скоро вы это понимаете — достаточно ли вам страницы/абзаца? Какие признаки выдают плохой, плохо написанный текст? Рефлексируете ли вы над тем, как устроен ваш вкус? Например, есть ли критерии, которые вы относите к универсальным, и критерии, которые вы определяете как "это норм, но мне н

9

3 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC388 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

«Темные теории» Дмитрия Хаустова — вдохновляющий, пугающий, эротически-расщепляющий, когтисто-царапающий экскурс в мир современной философии. Философии «после постмодерна», как говорит обложка. Терпеть не могу разные долженствования, но это нужно читать — чтобы выйти из коробочки занудных и банальных нарративов о человеческой исключительности. Хорошая философская книга — это как съездить в другую страну и понять, чт

👍11🔥9🥰8👀1🦄1🙏1

28 May 2026, 10:03 UTC441 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Запись вчерашней встречи 🙌 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yEStTcozFA

8🔥4👍2

27 May 2026, 09:36 UTC430 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Записаться можно тут. 19:00 по МСК!

6

27 May 2026, 09:34 UTC406 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

20👀5

9 May 2026, 12:35 UTC463 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @bandschoolPhoto

Как расписывается тот, кто учит всех расписаться? Делимся секретом писателя Степана Гаврилова — читайте в карточках! А еще больше нескучной теории, которой нет в писательских учебниках, хулиганских или классических упражнений и, конечно, неподражаемого юмора — в авторском мини-курсе «Расписаться» от Степана Гаврилова. Это курс для тех, кто: 😳 Хочет писать, но не знает, с чего начать 😔 Застрял на полпути и потерял

11🔥6🥰4

9 May 2026, 12:35 UTC368 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Всё так! Один из источников удовольствия, которые в последнее время для меня открылись - это тщательность, скрупулезность, монотонность. Это ещё требует осмысления, а пока вот.

🫡4

29 Apr 2026, 12:33 UTC485 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Запись вчерашней встречи: https://youtu.be/mHPzYtjxOTk

1310🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @gavr_st. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“осцилляции и роения” (@gavr_st), 387 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gavr_st.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.