Channel

baubley

@tbaubley

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

671subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001909300480
Type	Channel
Username	@tbaubley
Description	Психоаналитик лакановской ориентации https://t.me/baubley
Created	20 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	6 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/tbaubley

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 670–672 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
6 Aug 2026, 16:40	671	no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:37	671	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 3
Links: 12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

516 reactions across 18 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	235	45.5%
👍	58	11.2%
🤔	54	10.5%
🔥	50	9.69%
❤‍🔥	15	2.91%
🐳	14	2.71%
⚡	13	2.52%
💅	10	1.94%
🥰	10	1.94%
🫡	10	1.94%
😁	6	1.16%
🆒	5	0.969%
🏆	5	0.969%
🦄	4	0.775%
✍	3	0.581%
👎	3	0.581%
😨	3	0.581%
🤯	3	0.581%
🍌	2	0.388%
👏	2	0.388%
10 further kinds	11	2.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 516reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2023 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,060 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Forwarded from @spectate_ruPhoto

Публикуем эссе Татьяны Баублей @tbaubley, посвященное психоаналитической интерпретации мезальянса — или неравного (с точки зрения либидинальных инвестиций) союза, который, сплетая категории дара и потлача, ревности и зависти, схожим образом проявляет себя как в любви — то есть на «рынке отношений», — так и на рынке собственно экономическом. https://spectate.ru/accursed-share/ «От любовного дара, который ощущается с…

❤18⚡3🥰3👍2🤝1😍1

24 Mar 2025, 14:25 UTC≈3,020 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

И последняя https://syg.ma/@tbaubley/darian-lider-nekotorye-rassuzhdeniya-o-skorbi-i-melanholii-perevod-ch3

❤13👍5🔥3🤔3⚡1🏆1👎1

12 Feb 2025, 11:28 UTC≈3,290 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вторая часть https://syg.ma/@tbaubley/darian-lider-nekotorye-rassuzhdeniya-o-skorbi-i-melanholii-perevod-ch2

❤17❤‍🔥3🔥3🍌2

7 Jan 2025, 15:51 UTC≈3,340 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Выкладываю перевод статьи Дариана Лидера о скорби и меланхолии. Поскольку текст написан англосаксом — он напрочь лишен какого-либо намека на стиль, что никак не умаляет всех прочих его достоинств. Всего выйдет три части (в следующих двух все будет про Лакана, без паники, друзья). https://syg.ma/@tbaubley/darian-lider-nekotorye-rassuzhdeniya-o-skorbi-i-melanholii-perevod-ch1

❤17👍13🫡4🔥3👏1🤣1😁1

3 Aug 2024, 14:23 UTC≈3,510 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сомнительные выгоды от подобных подтасовок со стороны ангажированной части лакановского сообщества, в целом, не вызывают особенного интереса. Мы можем лишь со скукой констатировать, что выходя на сцену политического, психоанализ с неизбежностью… упрощается. Нет ничего удивительного в том, что его теоретический аппарат используется точно также, как некоторые достижения психиатрии советского периода, и именно ангажиров…

❤27🤔8💅7👍4🔥4💩1

3 Aug 2024, 14:23 UTC≈3,060 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В данном высказывании примечательна та легкость, с которой М. Страхов превращает «самую сложнодиагностируемую клиническую категорию», вокруг которой в лаканизме предполагается наибольшее количество возни, сомнений, сложностей и, соответственно, наслаждения в нечто, что буквально возможно «диагностировать по аватарке». Однако, возможность эта появляется строго на определенных условиях. Если внутри кабинета, аналитику …

❤24🤔6🥰3🔥2🍓1👍1

3 Aug 2024, 14:23 UTC≈2,370 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Forwarded from @phobosov

Так, короткие мысли вслух после просмотра последнего Дудя с Лебедевым. Новый клинический урок. Вы слушаете три часа вроде диалога, когда встреча как бы так и не состоялась. Встреча не состоялась по двум причинам (причем они взаимодополняющие, одна связана с другой). Первая - читаем текст (не знаю, не помню, переводили ли на русский) J-A Miller " Clinique ironique ". Там приводится пример шизофреника, имеющего опреде…

❤19🤔11😁5🫡2👍1👏1

26 Apr 2024, 09:23 UTC≈2,740 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Дмитрий Хаустов помог довести до ума последний текст — если вы его не читали, то стоит ознакомиться именно с этой версией.

26 Apr 2024, 09:23 UTC≈3,040 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Forwarded from @spectate_ru

Публикуем эссе лакановского психоаналитика Татьяны Баублей @tbaubley, в котором предпринимается попытка психоанализировать сам лакановский психоанализ. https://spectate.ru/paranoid-psy/ «Может статься так, что любителям искать психотика под кроватью стоит попробовать отыскать его на своей книжной полке, а быть может и на кресле у изголовья кушетки. По крайней мере подобное допущение способно до известной степени см…

❤15🔥9⚡5👍3🏆2

14 Mar 2024, 14:26 UTC≈2,720 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Forwarded from @radioljubljana

🤝🤝🤝 Славой Жижек: Каково отношение в психоанализе к переходу от традиционной власти мудрости, передаваемой из поколения в поколение, к правлению специализированного, экспертного знания - то есть к господству современного отраженного/ рефлексивного отношения, которому чужда опора на традиции? Психоанализ не является ни новой версией возвращения к традициям в противоположность избытку современной рефлексивности («нам …

❤6👍4🦄4🤔3🥰1🫡1

8 Mar 2024, 19:33 UTC≈6,890 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Получается, праздничное: https://syg.ma/@tbaubley/paranoyya-psihoanaliza

🔥10❤6❤‍🔥4💅3👍2🤔2😘1

11 Dec 2023, 15:00 UTC≈3,240 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Одна из сессий на этой неделе началась с рассказа анализанта о случае, произошедшем с его другом, который также начал посещать аналитика. Синопсис истории можно свести к следующему: аналитик рекомендовал посещение психиатра (и даже назвал класс лекарств, которые необходимо пропить), после чего последовало ухудшение состояния вкупе с чувством отверженности. Не преследуя цели ни оправдать, ни подвергнуть критике жест н…

❤7🤯3⚡2❤‍🔥2👍2🔥2🤔2🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tbaubley. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 271,257 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

SPECTATE
@spectate_ru · 4,7742 posts phobosov
@phobosov · 1,1031 post Radio Ljubljana 🍌
@radioljubljana · 7,6391 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

rothko's kimono
@rothkoskimono · 15,6163 posts SPECTATE
@spectate_ru · 4,7742 posts

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

XAOSMOS
@dima_cabre · 6,2091 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“baubley” (@tbaubley), 671 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tbaubley.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.