Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

not about art madame

@nickwrites

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

98subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002714319993
TypeChannel
Username@nickwrites
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nickwrites

Growth

979897.56 August 2026 — 97 subscribers9 August 2026 — 97 subscribers13 August 2026 — 98 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97–98 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:3398+1
9 Aug 2026, 12:0097no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:5297first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 22 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54045079515850422963237.6%
custom 54316919893073759192124.7%
custom 5251234351340876656910.6%
❤‍🔥67.06%
😍67.06%
55.88%
custom 525156840530722313333.53%
custom 519971141255694627411.18%
custom 539331271989607868011.18%
11.18%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC99 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @cosmoscowfairPhoto

📖 Вышел новый выпуск Художественного журнала #133, посвященный поколенческой динамике в культуре и искусстве: конфликтам и преемственности, повторению старого в новом, а также тому, как в цифровую эпоху меняется само представление о поколении. Из вступления: «Поколение убивает поколение». Этой формулой в одном из первых номеров «Художественного журнала» описывалась инновационная динамика культуры. Новое — а оно пре

custom 54045079515850422964custom 54316919893073759192

25 Apr 2026, 17:26 UTC219 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @terminaldesignPhoto

Друзья, спасибо, что были с нами! Невероятно крутой онлайн. Мы счастливы. Спасибо интересным спикерам, спасибо ведущей Ане (ты лучшая). Ждём всех в библиотеке завтра Очный лекционный день —встречаемся 26 апреля в Маяковке 📚 В рамках Terminal Design Future Fest третий блок будет посвящён теме «Искусство, контекст и будущее». Фокус на философии, этике и пересечении дизайна с современным искусством В программе блока

custom 54316919893073759194custom 54045079515850422962

27 Mar 2026, 16:24 UTC208 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Собрали новый эпический блиц!

custom 54316919893073759194custom 54045079515850422961

27 Mar 2026, 16:24 UTC245 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @spectate_ru

Хоррор уже давно перерос жанровые границы кино и литературы, став комплексной идеей медиа вообще, охватившей игры, философию и религию. Но как так вышло, что в ХХ веке наряду с марксистской философией именно ужасы стали новым топливом для развития мысли и эстетики? Мы поговорили с киноведами, художниками, разработчиками и критиками о том, как современные медиа — новости, кино, игры и искусство — используют «ужас» те

custom 54045079515850422967custom 54316919893073759194custom 52512343513408766563

9 Mar 2026, 14:25 UTC306 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

До дедлайна есть еще целая неделя, а мы уже получили более 80 заявок, спасибо всем, кто откликнулся! [Пост Open Call for Artists]

custom 54316919893073759197custom 54045079515850422963custom 52512343513408766562custom 51997114125569462741custom 52515684053072231331

28 Feb 2026, 16:44 UTC318 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @official_139DECPhoto

Вчера провели лекцию в НИУ ВШЭ, подразделение Высшей школы дизайна в канатном цехе. Говорили о 139DEC — о пути длиной в годы, о падениях и подъёмах, о том, как не останавливаться и не бояться перемен. Про внутреннюю опору и смелость идти в своё, даже когда вокруг шум. Невероятная энергия пространства канатного цеха, живая, внимательная аудитория и по-настоящему горящие глаза студентов — это бесценно. Да пребудет с

custom 54045079515850422968custom 52512343513408766562custom 52515684053072231332custom 53933127198960786801

22 Feb 2026, 13:37 UTC291 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hsedesignspbPhoto

✂️🔖 От идеи к коллекции через совместный творческий процесс На следующей неделе в Канатном цехе пройдёт открытая лекция Александра Карамышева — креативного директора и сооснователя авангардного модного бренда 139DEC, в основе которого лежат экспериментальные силуэты и исследовательская работа с материалом. На встрече Александр расскажет, как построить бренд международного уровня и как рождается коллекция — от разра

❤‍🔥5custom 540450795158504229632custom 525123435134087665621

22 Feb 2026, 13:36 UTC225 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Исторический авангард, являвшийся институциональной критикой и стремившийся вернуть искусство в «практику жизни», сам оказался частью музейных экспозиций. Тем не менее, термин «авангард» продолжает использоваться, в частности для обозначения экспериментальной, деконструированной, концептуальной моды. Авангард в моде становится позицией в горизонтальной плоскости — этической и технологической. Авангард здесь работает

😍6custom 540450795158504229643❤‍🔥1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @nickwrites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,015,515 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“not about art madame” (@nickwrites), 98 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nickwrites.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.